close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Teen to be tried for carrying rifle: UPDATE

Discussion in 'Carry Issues' started by Unistat, Jul 12, 2012.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Unistat

    Unistat
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    1,284
    2
    Location:
    SE Michigan, near Detroit
    Original thread.

    Update.

    Long and short of it, he was found not guilty on all charges.

     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
    #1 Unistat, Jul 12, 2012
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2012
  2. HerrGlock

    HerrGlock
    Expand Collapse
    Scouts Out
    CLM

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2000
    23,791
    182
    Outstanding. I'm glad to hear it.
     

  3. HerrGlock

    HerrGlock
    Expand Collapse
    Scouts Out
    CLM

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2000
    23,791
    182
    Just reading the various articles about it "Judge Marc Barron..." First thought was, "What the heck is a defensive safety doing as a judge?" :animlol:
     
  4. rmodel65

    rmodel65
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    180
    0
    and now i guess hes gonna file a section 1983 suit??
     
  5. itstime

    itstime
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2006
    7,176
    14
    Location:
    USA
    Good to hear.
     
  6. JGlockman

    JGlockman
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
    188
    0
    He should. He should sue everyone he can. Those prick cops deserve it.

    Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk 2
     
  7. HerrGlock

    HerrGlock
    Expand Collapse
    Scouts Out
    CLM

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2000
    23,791
    182
    I would.
     
  8. Unistat

    Unistat
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    1,284
    2
    Location:
    SE Michigan, near Detroit
    I don't know, probably.

    The thing is, I don't know what the PD and prosecutor were thinking on this one. They kind of left themselves open to a lawsuit.

    This particular issue has already been settled in Michigan by a couple of other cases and an Attorney General's Opinion (AG's Opinions are not binding law, but they do provide guidelines for PD and Prosecutors.)
     
  9. RussP

    RussP
    Expand Collapse
    Moderator
    1. The JBT's

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    33,158
    2,456
    Location:
    Central Virginia
    From the Update link:
     
  10. JGlockman

    JGlockman
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
    188
    0
    That's the thing... They weren't thinking. Rights get violated when you have over zealous and ignorant LEOs and prosecutors.

    Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk 2
     
  11. RussP

    RussP
    Expand Collapse
    Moderator
    1. The JBT's

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    33,158
    2,456
    Location:
    Central Virginia
    His attorney may have run that battle flag up the pole already.
    :whistling:
     
  12. John Rambo

    John Rambo
    Expand Collapse
    Raven

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    12,745
    821
    Location:
    Tampa, Fl.
    The people he needs to sue are going to be real uncomfortable when they get served!
     
  13. Bruce M

    Bruce M
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2010
    38,566
    9,273
    Location:
    S FL
    Combs said he wouldn’t call himself a rebel, but said he’s OK with “making some people uncomfortable.”

    Sounds like he accomplished that at least. It will be interesting to see who, if anyone, has to pay how much in the civil suit.
     
  14. collim1

    collim1
    Expand Collapse
    Shower Time!

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    7,225
    773
    Location:
    USA
    It would make you more open to a lawsuit to drop the charges. Alteast a judge agreed there was PROBABLE CAUSE for the arrest or it wouldn't have made it to trial.

    Probable cause for an arrest does not mean guilty.
     
  15. Unistat

    Unistat
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    1,284
    2
    Location:
    SE Michigan, near Detroit
    That's a good point and why I don't think I would sue if I was the kid. If the police were acting in good faith, they should be protected from lawsuits. A lawsuit might just be a waste of time and money.

    The prosecutor, on the other hand, could have denied the warrant and that would be the end of it. Happens everyday and does not leave either the PD open to a suit.

    As I said in the original thread, it seems that the prosecutor was being as activist/stupid as the kid in this case.
     
    #15 Unistat, Jul 12, 2012
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2012
  16. jph02

    jph02
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2012
    1,531
    0
    Location:
    Michigan
    This...

    and this.
     
  17. Bruce M

    Bruce M
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2010
    38,566
    9,273
    Location:
    S FL
    Part of a prosecutor's job may be to attempt to uphold the customs of a community. I wonder how much support the prosecutor would get from Birmingham residents; whether the residents approve of him carrying a rifle or if the residents approve of the prosecution of him.
     
  18. steveksux

    steveksux
    Expand Collapse
    Massive Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    19,160
    1,715
    That's what I was thinking. A couple charges were thrown out by the judge, I believe obstruction for not providing ID. So we know the judge knows he has that option... :supergrin: Just didn't believe the gun charge warranted it.

    All the prior open carrying cases that everyone is referring to all had to do with open carry of handguns, not a slung rifle, as far as I know. I'm guessing that's why the judge allowed it to go forward.

    I suppose now that he was found not guilty, there's no precedent established? Not like a court decided that a slung rifle is legal to open carry. A jury just found that in this one particular case the guy was not in violation of brandishing laws.

    Randy
     
  19. cowboywannabe

    cowboywannabe
    Expand Collapse
    you savvy?

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2001
    21,004
    4,514
    i guess it would help to know the law in one's own state on carrying a rifle or shotgun slung on your shoulder or across your back...etc....loaded or unloaded....with no obvious attempts to deploy it.

    if all that i listed above is legal i could still understand the cops detaining him to determine whats going on (until this becomes a commonly seen thing) then kicking him loose upon no finding of attempted wrong doing.
     
  20. JRWnTN

    JRWnTN
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    128
    0
    Location:
    Tenn
    With a statement like that before a jury, he could be awarded $1.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.