close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

SW1911A1 or Colt Government

Discussion in '1911 Forums' started by Kona2004, Mar 6, 2010.


  1. Kona2004

    Kona2004
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2009
    548
    0
    Location:
    Northern Kentucky
    I'm trying to decide what to get for my first 1911, which will basically serve as a range gun and just something else to add to the collections. I'd like to stay under a grand and found the following two that will fall below budget. Any suggestions or recommendations on either of these?

    S&W SW1911A1 (model # 108282) - $860
    Colt Government (model # O1091) - $805
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
  2. danlee36

    danlee36
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2010
    94
    0
    I personally think a good first 1911 for the money in the models you're looking at would be a Springfield. You could get a mil-spec for a few hundred less than those, or a Loaded for around the same price. Their customer service is one of the best in the industry, and you can make it a project gun or learn from it. Just something worth checkin out at least.
     

  3. zdragon23c

    zdragon23c
    Expand Collapse
    s&w&me

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2007
    719
    0
    Location:
    usa
    if this is your first 1911.....get the S&W 108282. You will thank later.
    i have had the exact model for over a year and a half....basically a zero maintenance(except for routine fieldstrip cleaning and oiling) and out-of-the-box zero issue 1911.
     
  4. danlee36

    danlee36
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2010
    94
    0
    I also just don't personally like the child proof "warning" label on the SW1911's lol
     
  5. Annoyedgrunt

    Annoyedgrunt
    Expand Collapse
    Dry Heat my ASS

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    5,076
    0
    Location:
    AZ
    I would go with the Colt if I were you, but I admit to being a little Colt-biased because I have one- a WWI repro 1911 that has been flawless to shoot, and the fit, finish, and machining have to be seen to be believed. It makes my Springfield Mil-Spec (an excellent pistol in its own right) seem like a cheap copy.

    And (for me, anyway) I'd get a Colt for the historical angle. Nothing against S&W, but they've only been making them since 2003 while Colt has been at it since, well, 1911. It may or not mean much to others, but it's nice to have a pistol with the same heritage as the pistols that our boys in Belleau Wood and Iwo Jima carried. :patriot:
     
  6. CMG

    CMG
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2001
    3,549
    12
    Location:
    Don't Mess with Texas
    I'm a big anti-fan of external extractors on 1911s, so the S&W and SIG are never on my short list.

    The Colt Combat Elite is available (on-line for less than $900) and offers most features folks like in a 1911 these days (BT grip safety, larger sights, tighter fit), and it's downright handsome!

    In any case, I prefer the Colt to the S&W.
     
  7. kilroy2721

    kilroy2721
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    742
    6
    Location:
    Florida
    While I have had both types of 1911's (internal & external extractor), I have NEVER had a problem with any of the S&W's. I also have the paticular model you are looking at the 108282. It is a good model. Don't use it any more as I have gone back to the Glock 21sf for the CDP division in IDPA.
     
  8. bac1023

    bac1023
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    101,815
    2,431
    Location:
    PA
    You're getting more for the money with S&W, but the Colt will hold its value better.

    Both are good, just different.
     
  9. Cobra64

    Cobra64
    Expand Collapse
    Deals in Facts

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    13,433
    1
    Location:
    Depends on where I am.
    I don't either.

    [​IMG]



    [​IMG]





    Seriously, my 108284 is extremely accurate, flawless reliability, and has a tailored appearance. Cost: about $1k.


    [​IMG]



    [​IMG]



    .
     
    #9 Cobra64, Mar 7, 2010
    Last edited: Mar 7, 2010
  10. Navitimer

    Navitimer
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2009
    816
    0
    I'm a Colt fan and would go with the Government model. Beautiful 1911 (and the original 1911 manufacturer) without all the crazy serrations. I should also say that I like the old school hammer grip safety.
     
  11. BOGE

    BOGE
    Expand Collapse
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 1999
    4,622
    0
    You´re in luck that the new S&W Titanium FP model sans needless extra safety garbage is now available. It is in essence a ¨Series 70¨ type 1911 albeit without internal extractor. If I were looking for a new Smith 1911 it´d be this one. The ONLY issue is that S&W did NOT use the larger & more reliable extractor as issued on their Performance Ctr. models.
     
  12. Cobra64

    Cobra64
    Expand Collapse
    Deals in Facts

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    13,433
    1
    Location:
    Depends on where I am.


    I have not had an issue with either extractor.


    [​IMG]



    [​IMG]



    .
     
  13. bac1023

    bac1023
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    101,815
    2,431
    Location:
    PA
    Me neither. :cool:


    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  14. BOGE

    BOGE
    Expand Collapse
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 1999
    4,622
    0
    http://forums.1911forum.com/showthread.php?t=211382&highlight=extractor
     
  15. Makoman

    Makoman
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    702
    51
    Location:
    Democratik People's Republik of Kommiefornia
    I'd go with the Colt but I will admit I'm a little biased. I've heard nothing but good things about the Smith's but I've had zero problems with the two that I own. I was going to sell the one but just couldn't bring myself to do it, in fact, now I'm looking for a Commander!

    [​IMG]
     
  16. rottboy_8

    rottboy_8
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    17
    0
    Location:
    HI
    As for 1911's, I seem to like them all, some more than others, but if I have a bountyful supply of cash, would get them all.
    Have never come across a Colt I didn't like, but then again, after shooting a couple of S&W Performance Center revolvers last Sunday at a match, their 1911's should be in the same quality level.
    My current Colts are very accurate and tight (both used). Be warned that once the "bug has bitten", one won't be enough!!!!
     
  17. Cobra64

    Cobra64
    Expand Collapse
    Deals in Facts

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    13,433
    1
    Location:
    Depends on where I am.
    I know what you mean. :)


    [​IMG]



    [​IMG]



    [​IMG]



    [​IMG]



    .
     
  18. bac1023

    bac1023
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    101,815
    2,431
    Location:
    PA

    I'm not really sure I'd use accurate and tight to describe Colt 1911s.

    Compared to a Glock, sure. However, by 1911 standards I don't agree.

    I do think they're very well built, but Colts are usually fairly loose compared to many others.
     
  19. Cobra64

    Cobra64
    Expand Collapse
    Deals in Facts

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    13,433
    1
    Location:
    Depends on where I am.
    Surprisingly enough, this WWI reproduction has relatively little slide slop, but the barrel to barrel bushing is loosy-goosy. It does lock up tight though.

    A few days ago we bench rested for accuracy, and at 15 yards it was consistenly shooting 5" groups.

    [​IMG]



    [​IMG]
     
  20. MD357

    MD357
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2008
    4,124
    11
    Frame to slide fit ~5% MAYBE of total accuracy. Otherwise it would be VERY hard to prove that vertical lockup is any better or worse than other makes in terms of factory specs.