I need some advice and I would appreciate your personal feelings with this as I trust your opinion. I am struggling to decide on which of the many choices in a small 9mm I will end up with. Unfortunately I don't have the ability to shoot any of these before I make my final choice. I have been reading everything I can find and have held all, but one. I am looking at the Ruger LC9, Kel-Tek PF9, Taurus 709 slim and the Kahr CW9. I like the Ruger and Taurus because the both have safeties which I personally like. (I know not for some). You gave the Kahr a very good review and have publicly stated you didn't like the Ruger trigger. I know of another well respected reviewer that uses the Kel-Tek for their personal CCW. Cost is another consideration as the Kahr is the most expensive, followed by the Taurus, then the Ruger and the cheapest being the Kel_Tek. I know cost shouldn't be consideration number one in this case, but there is over a $250 difference between the highest and the lowest cost. I guess what I am asking is that would you trust all of these and in what order from best to lowest would you choose to carry? Does having a safety on a "pocket gun" sway your opinion either good or bad? I know the way a trigger feels and the way it shoots is a personal opinion and may not reflect my preferences, but I would still like your opinion as I trust it far more then most. Thanks, Mark Wanna kill these ads? We can help!