close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

State of hawaii introduced "assault weapons ban" sb219!!!!!!

Discussion in 'Gun-Control Issues' started by DEFEND GLOCK, Jan 21, 2013.


  1. DEFEND GLOCK

    DEFEND GLOCK
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2012
    5
    0
    Location:
    HAWAII
    Hawaii is trying to pass the assault weapon ban bill 219!
    There are also other bills recently introduced including annual renewal of firearms registration including a fee which currently there is no fee and once you register you are set. Also requiring proof of ownership of a certain firearm to buy ammunition for it. PLEASE READ!!! ATTACHED IS THE BILL LINK.

    http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/measur...billnumber=219

    PDF link to bill:

    http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessio...lls/SB219_.pdf
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
  2. G-Lock808

    G-Lock808
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    704
    0
    Location:
    Mid Pac.
    Welcome, you should join the 2aHawaii forum if you haven't already. There's ongoing discussion about this.
     

  3. Alizard

    Alizard
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2012
    1,282
    2
    States have the rights to impose ridiculous restrictions, just like in california. Your only recourse is to vote with your feet. There is going to be more stupid state laws, just look at New York.
     
  4. Chevytuff19

    Chevytuff19
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    462
    0
    Location:
    Texas
    Wow...not even a grandfather clause in that one...even NY included a grandfather clause. This bill is the worst one I have seen yet. :steamed:
     
  5. GLJones

    GLJones
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    116
    0
    Location:
    Orlando, Florida
    Not anymore. The Supreme Court incorporated the 2nd into the 14th Amendment so, No, the state cannot infringe on the 2nd Amendment either.
     
  6. Alizard

    Alizard
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2012
    1,282
    2
    The SCOTUS affirmed the legal right to own a gun, but the state's are still able to put a ton of restrictions on it.

    And, in case you have not noticed, in recent decades some states have been ignoring federal law.

    Legal marijuana? Absolutely illegal under federal law.

    The good news is they can't ban guns and they can't collect them. The bad news: they can, like Hawaii, put license restrictions on guns, ammo, and require registrations.
     
    #6 Alizard, Jan 23, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2013
  7. Chevytuff19

    Chevytuff19
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    462
    0
    Location:
    Texas
    The Hawaii bill specifically states that you cannot own "assault weapons" anymore and even has a clause stating how you are to turn them in to the police.
     
  8. damnyankee20

    damnyankee20
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2012
    180
    0
    Forward to SAF and NRA.
     
  9. damnyankee20

    damnyankee20
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2012
    180
    0
    I'm not sure about states can put restrictions so I welcome these laws so they can be challenged in Federal Court - specifically, SCOTUS.

    If you read Heller then listen to Scalia on Youtube, he states "Bear" means any firearm that one can carry; and he ponders the question if that would include rocket grenade launchers; he shrugs and says they'll (SCOTUS) have to answer that question when a case comes before them. He also states the primary purpose of the 2nd Amendment is for citizens to have firearms to repel a government who attacks the citzenry.

    Restrictions means WHERE they can be carried - such as schools, churches, etc.

    So it'll be interesting when "assault weapons" go to SCOTUS - I'll bet SCOTUS will rule any carryable firearm (including full autos) will be allowed as they were before elitist FDR was president.

    I say: BRING IT!
     
    #9 damnyankee20, Jan 23, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2013
  10. damnyankee20

    damnyankee20
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2012
    180
    0
    UNCONSTITUTIONAL on every level.

    Alan Gura will be more than happy to take this up to the federal courts!
     
  11. damnyankee20

    damnyankee20
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2012
    180
    0
    "Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword because the whole body of the people are armed and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States. A military force, at the command of Congress, can execute no laws, but such as the people perceive to be just and constitutional; for they will possess the power, and jealousy will instantly inspire the inclination, to resist the execution of a law which appears to them unjust and oppressive."

    Noah Webster, Founding Father
    An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution
    , 1787
     
    #11 damnyankee20, Jan 23, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2013