close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

Springfield Loaded, any opinions??

Discussion in '1911 Forums' started by S. Kelly, Jan 17, 2010.

  1. S. Kelly

    S. Kelly

    1,146
    21
    Jan 31, 2000
    Boston MA
    I'm considering a SA Loaded. Any opinions? Best price? Thanks in advance.
     
  2. nastytrigger

    nastytrigger Mediocre Member

    2,241
    0
    Apr 10, 2005
    Indiana
    I've told my story about my Loaded Parkerized hundreds of times on GT... First mag, five shots in, tritium vial flies out of sight. Finished shooting more rounds, but ruined my day. Sent to Geneseo to fix. With factory mags, Chip McCormick, they would get stuck in the back of the mag well. Magazines would not seat. I had to file a sharp edge just forward of the sear/disco in the mag well to allow those mags to seat. Wilsons had no problems. Heard bad things about finishing on my parkerized. I regretted getting parkerized when I bought it, but did anyway. Rust comes and goes no matter what I do to it. Not as accurate as I hoped. Luckily, I bought this 1911 as a test gun. First 1911 ever so I wanted a 'frills' basic one. Now, the gun shoots anything, LRN, FMJ, Golden Sabers, +P Cor-Bon, Gold Dots, Wolf. I have plans to send it back to Springfield to the Custom Shop to put in a Nowlin barrel/match bushing, tighten slide to frame, Black T finish, extended mag well, 3.5lb trigger, etc. For now, sticking with my Glocks mostly. I guess mine could be considered a lemon since I've heard some great reviews that led me to this gun. I'm keeping my Loaded, don't get me wrong, but buyer beware.
     

    Last edited: Jan 17, 2010

  3. sns3guppy

    sns3guppy

    4,393
    894
    Sep 4, 2006
    If you're really stuck on Springfield, then get a TRP, instead.
     
  4. Gary1911A1

    Gary1911A1

    3,248
    45
    Jun 14, 2005
    Ohio for now
    I agree. Better hand fitting than the Loaded.
     
  5. hikerpaddler

    hikerpaddler

    1,504
    1
    Mar 1, 2001
    USA
    The loaded's are excellent guns. As far as price, it's what you find.
     
  6. glassglock

    glassglock

    17
    0
    Feb 27, 2010
    Indiana
    I own 3 Springfield Loaded 1911's. All three are flwless in their operation and of the 3, my parkerized model is the most accurate. The accuracy of a 1911 depends on how well the parts are fitted, and I just got lucky with my parkerized loaded. I own hanguns from most major manufacturers, and so far this 1911 is the most mechanically accurate by far.

    My SA Loaded 1911 parkerized:
    [​IMG]

    14-shots @ 25-yards, unsupported Weaver stance:
    [​IMG]
     
  7. Jason D

    Jason D INFRINGED Silver Member Millennium Member

    41,960
    1,004
    Jun 16, 1999
    Mivonks, MI
    I have two of the loaded models.
    One in stainless, and one parkerized. I bought them both at the same time years ago, with the idea of using the stainless for a CCW gun.

    They are both good guns, but if I could go back and buy them again. I probably wouldn't opt for the loaded models. I would go with the milspec instead.

    There are features that make the loaded attractive to many people. Namely the commander hammer, beavertail, front cocking serrations, and Novak nightsights.
    These features are exactly what I found I don't like.
     
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2010
  8. ambluemax

    ambluemax

    560
    0
    Feb 6, 2007
    I highly recomend the loaded. I have a TRP, but I think they are a little over priced now NIB, so the loaded is a better value in what you actually get for what you pay.

    Hard to elaborate too much if you don't give us more info on your intended use.
     
  9. ronin.45

    ronin.45

    11,417
    832
    Apr 24, 2008
    NE OHIO
    The loaded is a great starter 1911. Solid, accurate, and reliable.
    Of course it doesn't match up to a TRP or semi-custom guns. In it's price range it is a good choice.
     
  10. ArmoryDoc

    ArmoryDoc

    4,067
    40
    May 14, 2006
    Kansas
    Good gun for the money.
     
  11. GVFlyer

    GVFlyer Senior Member

    10,616
    1,628
    Sep 9, 2008
    Somewhere in the air.
    It's called the "Loaded" because it's loaded with Metal Injected Molding parts.
     
  12. bac1023

    bac1023

    102,314
    2,689
    Sep 26, 2004
    PA
    Honestly, save a few extra bucks for the TRP.
     
  13. GVFlyer

    GVFlyer Senior Member

    10,616
    1,628
    Sep 9, 2008
    Somewhere in the air.
    Deleted - duplicate post.
     
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2010
  14. GVFlyer

    GVFlyer Senior Member

    10,616
    1,628
    Sep 9, 2008
    Somewhere in the air.
    Incredible shooting at over 80 feet.
     
  15. SouthpawShootr

    SouthpawShootr NRA Life Member

    2,693
    1
    Aug 17, 2001
    Chesapeake, Va
    That'll probably be my next.
     
  16. Ryobi

    Ryobi SummertimeRules

    2,175
    2
    May 10, 2002
  17. bac1023

    bac1023

    102,314
    2,689
    Sep 26, 2004
    PA
    Eh

    I actually prefer the S&W SW1911 or Kimber custom II in the same price range.
     
  18. hikerpaddler

    hikerpaddler

    1,504
    1
    Mar 1, 2001
    USA
    Good for you bac. Ryobi is quite correct however. Eh. :wavey:
     
    Last edited: Mar 4, 2010
  19. ambluemax

    ambluemax

    560
    0
    Feb 6, 2007
    I notice you say this a lot and I'm sure you've said why before...but could you refresh my (our) memory please?
     
  20. Bill Lumberg

    Bill Lumberg BTF Inventor

    6,845
    9
    Jun 14, 2002
    Quote re: bac and loadeds:

     
    Last edited: Mar 4, 2010