close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Social Security Administration Requests Massive Amounts of .357 Ammo

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by snerd, Aug 16, 2012.

  1. snerd

    snerd

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    16,214
    Likes Received:
    8,389
    Hmmmmmmm...........
     
  2. wprebeck

    wprebeck Got quacks?

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2002
    Messages:
    8,900
    Likes Received:
    2,821
    Location:
    Mm..looks like heaven
    See thread in GNG for great disappointment. The NOAA has, as a division within the agency, something known as the Maritime Fisheries department, or some such title. They apparently act as game wardens at the federal level. Don't know about their specific mission, never even heard of them. But, they're a federal LE agency.

    Of course, Glen Beck's retarded site could've done the same Google search as anyone else....but that doesn't sound near as evil as the way they titled it.
     

  3. barbedwiresmile

    barbedwiresmile Unreconstructed

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2008
    Messages:
    10,036
    Likes Received:
    45
    Location:
    Dixie
    While there is plenty to be concerned about with racket commonly known as modern 'government', and while we have clearly crossed the debt Event Horizon and shouldn't be buying anything at the federal level (much less ammo), and while I am obviously a big critic of, to use the GT euphemism, "law enforcement", I have two issues with this article:

    First is the use of the term "high powered ammo". It's a term the statists and media use. Like "high powered rifle". It has no meaning.

    Second, I'm not sure I would call 174k rounds a "massive" purchase for a debt-sunk, pension bloated federal agency.
     
  4. JBnTX

    JBnTX

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    Messages:
    21,139
    Likes Received:
    5,760
    Why are the civilian departments of the government arming themselves?

    Sure they all have armed sub-departments, but they don't need nearly that much ammo.

    If Game Wardens, Couriers and Bank Guards are having massive gun battles, why aren't we hearing about it?
     
  5. Kingarthurhk

    Kingarthurhk Isaiah 53:4-9

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    10,687
    Likes Received:
    1,574
    Location:
    Texas
    They are probably moving away from the .40 to the .357 sig. Anywhoo, most of these entities have a law enforcement arm, usually investigators. They investigate fraud both internally and externally.

    The Post Office has had one for a really really long time as well.
     
  6. Sam Spade

    Sam Spade Staff Member Lifetime Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2003
    Messages:
    15,443
    Likes Received:
    3,415
    Ya know, I bet the weeper and his devoted followers would have their heads explode if all the small specialized agencies had everything transferred over to the feebs.

    Mission, men, materiel...move it to a centralized agency and listen to them howl.
     
  7. GAFinch

    GAFinch

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    Messages:
    5,937
    Likes Received:
    35
    Location:
    Georgia
    Agencies are switching over to .357 sig not because they need additional firepower, but because the Secret Service, one of the most respected agencies, adopted it. When you switch calibers, you have to restock your inventory and train on the new ammo.

    Stupid, wasteful, unnecessary government spending during a recession.
     
  8. The Fist Of Goodness

    The Fist Of Goodness

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2005
    Messages:
    4,121
    Likes Received:
    1,303
    Location:
    Falling into Crime's Dinner Party.
    As I stated in the other thread, 175000 rds would be enough to qualify about 180 agents at my agency per year.

    Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
     
  9. PawDog

    PawDog NRA Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2005
    Messages:
    3,302
    Likes Received:
    23
    Location:
    Big Thicket, Texas
    I used to oversee the budget for approximately 500 staff for annual firearms re-qualification, and annually approved the purchase of 60,000 rounds of 9mm, 60,000 rounds of 5.56, and 30,000 rounds of 12 gauge rounds, solely for training purposes. It took around six to eight weeks in rotation to re-qualify all staff.

    This didn't include purchases for special ops teams who trained every other month and quarterly, and didn't include ammo purchases for duty carry either.

    Given this, purchase of 174,000 rounds isn't a huge purchase for an entire government agency. Also, as the federal fiscal year ends September 30th each year, we had to have all year-end funds or the current fiscal year spent before September 1st every year, or lose the equal funding for the upcoming fiscal year.
     
  10. Lethaltxn

    Lethaltxn

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,678
    Likes Received:
    988
    Location:
    Texas
    This is one of the things that I find incredibly stupid when it comes to government agency budgets.
    I have no clue why they just don't roll the savings into next years budget.
     
  11. The Fist Of Goodness

    The Fist Of Goodness

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2005
    Messages:
    4,121
    Likes Received:
    1,303
    Location:
    Falling into Crime's Dinner Party.
    Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way. Agencies are punished for not spending money. If you don't spend it this year, they lower your budget the next year. Things like fuel prices increasing or decreasing are not factored in. Last year, our field office spent a couple thousand dollars buying Hatch gloves for everyone in September. I already have two or three pairs, but was given another.





    Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
     
  12. PawDog

    PawDog NRA Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2005
    Messages:
    3,302
    Likes Received:
    23
    Location:
    Big Thicket, Texas
    Agree. I always thought it was hypocritical as we were always directed to be "good stewards of the people's money," yet were forced to scramble to spend year-end funds every year or lose equal funding the next fiscal year.

    I also had to justify, in writing weekly, every hour of overtime paid to cover shifts, even though my department was only staffed at around 90% of needed and authorized manpower.
     
  13. Lethaltxn

    Lethaltxn

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,678
    Likes Received:
    988
    Location:
    Texas
    I know. It's idiocy. It's just spending money for the sake of spending it, because it's there.
    But what else do we expect from government.
     
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2012
  14. aircarver

    aircarver Descent Terminated Silver Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2002
    Messages:
    29,096
    Likes Received:
    5,530
    Location:
    Ft. Worth, Republic of Texas
    So thaaaaaat's how they're gonna solve their fiscal problem ...... :wow:

    .
     
  15. Guss

    Guss

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2010
    Messages:
    4,600
    Likes Received:
    388
    Location:
    Tampa
    Yep, they've got armed guards at my Social Security office. I have no problem with it.
     
  16. G29Reload

    G29Reload Tread Lightly

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2009
    Messages:
    13,286
    Likes Received:
    364
    Yep. They're gonna use it to off the old people when they come in to inquire why they havent received their checks. Just how Obama rolls. I can see it happening. Thats what i heard on the interwebs anyway. :rofl:
     
  17. countrygun

    countrygun

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2012
    Messages:
    17,069
    Likes Received:
    22

    Budgeting, in most agencies, also has a "trade off" component. That is they submit individual items to create the over all "budget" for the next year but they my not be comitted to a "line item" on each part of the budget.

    In other words, some time in the next year after the budget has been approved in total, they can say "Oops I guess we don't need that much ammo as much as we need new office chairs".

    If anything was "afoot" that the tinfoilers should worry about it would be in the actual expenditures during the year and the re-allocation of existing funds for purchases NOT ANNOUNCED in the "budget". Or the inter-agency re-allocation of items which do not show up until the end of the year reports of what HAS happened.
     
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2012
  18. series1811

    series1811 Enforcerator. CLM

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2003
    Messages:
    11,385
    Likes Received:
    17
    Location:
    Retired, but not expired.
    They might be stockpiling it for when they have to tell people that they don't have any money left to pay their retirement after taking all their payments for it all those years.
     
  19. aircarver

    aircarver Descent Terminated Silver Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2002
    Messages:
    29,096
    Likes Received:
    5,530
    Location:
    Ft. Worth, Republic of Texas
    This ! ... :wow:

    .
     
  20. FFR Spyder GT

    FFR Spyder GT Ex-Gunslinger

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,132
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Hog Jaw, Arkansas
    Howdy PSB,

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by PSB
    The RFQ is for 174 thousand rounds of ".357 Sig 125 grain bonded jacketed hollow point pistol ammunition
    Part# GSB357SB/29408 357 SIG 125 BJHP B"


    You don't use hollow points for target practice.
    Poor people don't but Military, LEO's and Feds practice with the same ammo they carry.

    When I was in the Military and later as a Gov't employee/contractor we would buy 9mm practice ammo for our MP-5's by the 25,000 round pallets.

    10 men shooting 500 rounds a day = 5,000 rounds.

    5,000 rounds x 5 days = 25,000 rounds.

    So, 46,000 rounds would not last long, not even two weeks.

    Plus we shoot .380acp, .38 Special, 10mm, .45acp, .223/5.56, .308 and .300 Win Mag. Plus .22LR in a suppressed Ruger MKII pistol.

    Look at a standard Army infantry company of 150 men on range day were they fire 200 rounds through their M-16/M-4. 150 x200= 30,000 rounds in a single day.

    30,000 rounds x 5 companies = 150,000 rounds.

    Spyder