Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Forum at

Why should YOU join our forums?

  • Connect with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Read up on the latest product reviews
  • Make new friends to go shooting with!
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

Glock Talk is the #1 site to discuss the world’s most popular pistol, chat about firearms, accessories and more.

Slidefire stock type and Feinstein ban

Discussion in 'General Firearms Forum' started by humanguerrilla, Jan 25, 2013.

  1. humanguerrilla


    Jul 25, 2006
    the woods
    I just got the full 122 page text of the Feinstein ban and it would be a monster. I hadn't heard that,

    "Any part, combination of parts, compo
    nent, device, attachment, or accessory that is de
    signed or functions to accelerate the rate of fire of
    a semiautomatic rifle but not convert the semiauto
    matic rifle into a machinegun"

    would be banned.

    This would ban the Slidefire stocks, certain legal trigger devices and possibly even low mass bolt carriers or other competition parts that technically could be demonstrated to increase cyclic rate.
    Last edited: Jan 25, 2013

  2. Bren

    Bren NRA Life Member

    Jan 16, 2005
    Maybe, it's hard to say what that means, so it will need court interpretation if this idiocy becomes law.
  3. The_Gun_Guru

    The_Gun_Guru Build the Wall

    First come the bans. When that doesn't reduce crime, they will begin confiscating, and THAT will start the war.

    A storm is coming folks.

  4. samuse


    Jul 30, 2008
    South TX
    I don't really think we need to worry about the specifics as this has almost zero chance of passage.

    What this is, is the first punch, taken from out of reach, to get the fight on. They're feeling out the opposition, seeing how far they can reach without getting hit, feeling out our defense, wearing us down, weakening our offense.

    Just like boxing.
  5. RMTactical

    RMTactical CLM

    Oct 7, 2000
    Behind an AR-15
    Never underestimate your enemy.
  6. Spiffums

    Spiffums I.C.P.

    Sep 30, 2006
    New York State is the test bed for this. If they confiscate after so much blatant lawlessness over the ones who don't comply with the their new law and no one fights back......they will simple take our guns.
  7. thinktwice


    Mar 29, 2007
    North Carolina
    This ban stuff is just a clever plan to put some more money in Feinstein's and Obama's pocket. They got together with the gun dealers , manufactures, and ammo makers to split the profits. You gotta admit they have been selling the hell out of gun's and ammo, at inflated prices to boot. I mean Obama is a marketing genius.........I am just say'n
  8. The_Gun_Guru

    The_Gun_Guru Build the Wall

    they can try but they will fail :)

    there are more of us than there are of them. There is no way they could defeat more than 1.5 MILLION people shooting at them!

    NO WAY!!!

  9. NEOH212

    NEOH212 Diesel Girl

    Mar 25, 2008
    North East Ohio
    She had better ban rubber bands too then......:whistling:
  10. Glockdude1

    Glockdude1 Federal Member CLM

    May 24, 2000

    First was no limit on magazines, then 10, now 7.

    They won't stop until we have no fireams at all.

  11. bustedknee

    bustedknee Curmudgeon

    Aug 1, 2001
    Wythe County, VA
    And if you bump-fire using your fingers they will confiscate your fingers. :laughing:
  12. JerryVO


    Oct 22, 2008
    Tampa, FL
    This could be an interesting angle... it says right on the slidefire website that it can help the physically challenged use a rifle more safely. .. can you say ADA vs AWB.

    Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2