close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Sig Sauer P228 vs. P229

Discussion in 'General Firearms Forum' started by nEEdLzZz, Feb 16, 2012.


  1. nEEdLzZz

    nEEdLzZz
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2012
    16
    0
    hey guys...

    i'm currently shopping for either a sig p228 or p229..

    i've heard people say that the p228 is a better gun..and the only difference is that the p228 is made out of carbon stamped steel (which is more prone to develop rust) and the p229 out of forged stainless steel...

    so for me it sounds that the p229 is better, quality-wise...

    does anyone have practical experience with either one of these guns? even long-term experience or "war" experience?

    any info on this would be very much appreciated...:cool::wavey:
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
  2. 2-8 Marine

    2-8 Marine
    Expand Collapse
    Limp Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2009
    1,264
    0
    Well, I've owned my P228 for 13 years and its still going strong and never any rust. I can assure you quality wise its hard to beat the P228. Are you sure about the difference in steel used to built either gun?
     

    #2 2-8 Marine, Feb 16, 2012
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2012
  3. Tim151515

    Tim151515
    Expand Collapse
    iHeartGuns

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2011
    1,889
    0
    Location:
    Dayton, OH
    A gun will only rust if you let moister build up. As long as you keep it wiped down after handling it you will be fine. And, contrary to popular belief, stainless guns can rust too. I have seen many a rusted revolver and 1911 that people just assumed, "its stainless, it wont rust."
     
  4. jwhite75

    jwhite75
    Expand Collapse
    Gubmint Worker

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    1,174
    3
    Location:
    Dub V
    The slide is made differently. The 229 was changed due to the higher pressures associated with the .40 and .357 sig rounds.

    The 228 IMO has a better balance in the hand and shoots better too. I shoot indoor bullseye matches locally and for S n G I shot my 228 last month. 3.75 in barrel with Factory Federal 9mm from Wally. I was within mere points from the top shooters who were shooting custom 1911s and ppc revolvers with light handloads and wadcutters.

    If you are going 9mm get the 228 and make sure its a German. You wont be sorry.
     
  5. bac1023

    bac1023
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    100,726
    1,974
    Location:
    PA
    For just 9mm, I feel the P228 is the better choice.
     
  6. nEEdLzZz

    nEEdLzZz
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2012
    16
    0
    well..based on this wikipedia article...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sig_P226#P228
     
  7. BailRecoveryAgent

    BailRecoveryAgent
    Expand Collapse
    Rude Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2010
    3,063
    2
    The 228 definitely balances better, but I don't think I would have been able to tell the difference if I wasn't holding both at the same time.

    I would probably go with the 228 if it was me.
     
  8. nutty_one

    nutty_one
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2004
    735
    0
    Location:
    Pac NW
    Are you wanting a 9mm or a .40? The 228 is only available in 9mm - the 229 was made as more or less a stronger version of the 228 to handle the recoil of the .40 and the .357Sig rounds, but you can get 9mm 229's also. Both are fine weapons.
     
  9. nEEdLzZz

    nEEdLzZz
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2012
    16
    0
    yep...i'm looking for a 9mm..
    i've found one which was kept as a collectors item and apparently has never been shot...

    here's the link:

    http://ch.gebrauchtwaffen.ch/catalo...G-Sauer-P-228-9x19mm-ParabellumLugerNATO.html

    it's in german though..since i live in switzerland :wavey:
     
  10. cowboy1964

    cowboy1964
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    18,800
    1,312
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    If I ever get another Sig it will probably be a 228, or maybe a 225.
     
  11. Tx-SIG229

    Tx-SIG229
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2011
    685
    0
    Location:
    Texas
    i like them both but the p228 is lighter.

    fwiw, lately i have been carrying a g19 or g23 mainly because they are lighter and the mags are cheaper :)
     
  12. cowboy1964

    cowboy1964
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    18,800
    1,312
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    Ditto. 5" height, 30 oz loaded with 16 rounds, every holster and accessory you could ever dream of, easiest to mod and detail strip, etc etc. I'm trying a lot of different carry guns but I keep coming back to the G19. I'm finally starting to shoot it halfway decently too (it's only been two years).
     
    #12 cowboy1964, Feb 16, 2012
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2012
  13. Rinspeed

    Rinspeed
    Expand Collapse
    JAFO

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2001
    9,665
    404
    Location:
    NY
    One of the biggest things I think you should consider is if you buy a 228 you are stuck with a 9mm forever. If you get a 229 in .40 or .357 you can get a 9mm conversion barrel. There is nothing wrong with the sheet steel slides but they do require a little more care.
     
  14. adamg01

    adamg01
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2007
    3,415
    127
    Location:
    va
    Without a doubt. You don't need the beefier 229 for the 9mm round. If I ever decide to own another .40, it will be the 229. I have only owned about 5 or so Sig's and it was my favorite. I preferred the G19 over my 228 but I much preferred the 229 over the G23. I guess I am weird like that.
     
  15. 1stMAW

    1stMAW
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2011
    64
    0
    I own 3 sig 228's. 3229's and 3 225's. The 228 and the 225 are much lighter and well balanced, the 229 is top heavy....Most of the time I carry a 229 in .357sig around my farm and the 225 as my carry piece...My wife has usurped the 228's....I carry a colt 1911 as well....
     
  16. fnfalman

    fnfalman
    Expand Collapse
    Chicks Dig It

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2000
    49,717
    2,658
    Location:
    California & New Mexico, US
    P228 = better balance and German made.
    P229 = top heavy feel and American made.

    I have both and I can't remember the last time I shot my P229.
     
  17. 125K9

    125K9
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    810
    86
    Location:
    East TX./ Home: Lookout Mtn., AL
    Sigs are my favorite pistols, although I carry, and like, Glocks. My first P228 came in 1991, and has always been flawless throughout all of these years. I picked up a second 228, a 1990 built CPO, about 3 years ago. It too has been flawless. In 2008 I bought a P229 9mm and did my upmost to like it but never managed. Compared to the 228's it seemed way top heavy and out of balance. Once you've had a German-built P228 nothing else feels quite right.
     
  18. arclight610

    arclight610
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    3,038
    0
    Last week The Onion had an article about the Sig P228. They said that the Sig slides are made of cast iron.
     
  19. 12131

    12131
    Expand Collapse
    Monkeyboy
    CLM

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2006
    6,280
    2
    Location:
    God's Country (Texas)
    For metal double stack 9, the Sig P228 rules! Just completed this wheel last week, with 4 W. Germans and 3 Germans. Shipwreck, get in here!:supergrin:
    [​IMG]
     
  20. 12131

    12131
    Expand Collapse
    Monkeyboy
    CLM

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2006
    6,280
    2
    Location:
    God's Country (Texas)
    Of course, they are.:supergrin:
     
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
Sig-Sauer P228? General Firearms Forum Apr 20, 2016
Non-Glock SIG Sauer P228 / P229 9mm 13rd magazines - Pre-ban Gun Parts & Accessories Apr 17, 2016
Sig Sauer P229 VS M11-A! Pistols The Sig Sauer Club Sep 13, 2013
Sig Sauer P228 Wanted To Buy Dec 5, 2010
WTB Sig Sauer P228 or P229 9mm Wanted To Buy Apr 3, 2010