close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Should we dump the Electoral College?

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by wjv, Oct 30, 2012.


  1. wjv

    wjv
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2002
    13,726
    1,135
    Location:
    Pacific NW
    Then every vote would really count.

    Blue people in Red States.
    Red people in Blue States.
    Wouldn't matter. .

    Someone's vote in SD would count just as much as someone's vote in NY

    Do we really need the Electoral College anymore?

    Opinions?
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
  2. aircarver

    aircarver
    Expand Collapse
    Ride Continues
    Silver Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2002
    27,409
    3,089
    Location:
    Ft. Worth, Republic of Texas
  3. G29Reload

    G29Reload
    Expand Collapse
    Tread Lightly

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2009
    13,286
    362
    No it wouldn't. Large population centers and all their urban influence would drown out other parts of the country where there is still some sanity.

    The Framers were wise indeed. Nothing but foolishness to dump the electoral college.
     
  4. pmcjury

    pmcjury
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2008
    713
    2
    No but the electoral college votes should not be all or nothing within a state. If the popular vote is split 70/30 that should be reflected in the electoral college

    Sent from my ADR6410LVW using Tapatalk 2
     
  5. Flintlocker

    Flintlocker
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2011
    1,247
    0
    Here's an example of the biggest advantage Republicans get out of the EC. Are you sure you want to give that up?[​IMG]
     
  6. concretefuzzynuts

    concretefuzzynuts
    Expand Collapse
    Brew Crew

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2011
    7,475
    13
    Location:
    PNW
    Not unless you want NY City, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, Atlanta and Philadelphia deciding the election for you.
     
  7. SCmasterblaster

    SCmasterblaster
    Expand Collapse
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 1999
    17,767
    541
    Location:
    Hartford, Vermont
    Certainly not. It keeps 50 states determining who is POTUS.
     
  8. czsmithGT

    czsmithGT
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2004
    10,823
    1,332
    Seems like that would be pretty much the same as dumping the electoral college. I think we should keep it for the same reasons it was originally implemented. I also think we should go back to having state legislatures name the state's US Senators. And finally, we should limit campaigning and campaign fundraising to the six months prior to election date.
     
  9. Syclone538

    Syclone538
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2006
    2,086
    0
    +1
    The states need more power in relation to the fed gov, not less.

    Just to be clear because I know some statist authoritarian is going to say "see, you like a powerful gov too." All forms of government in these U.S. need less power, but I would not choose to take power away from states without first taking a lot of power from fed gov.
     
  10. tslex

    tslex
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2002
    1,599
    36
    Location:
    Paradise
    Kind of thinking a tie in the EC would be interesting (and not completely impossible).

    In that case the House elects the POTUS (and the slight R majority would choose Romney) and the Senate elects the VP (where Biden would win).

    Can you imagine anything more entertaining than four years of a Romney/Biden administration?
     
  11. concretefuzzynuts

    concretefuzzynuts
    Expand Collapse
    Brew Crew

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2011
    7,475
    13
    Location:
    PNW
    I'll add another twist. Since it in a presidential election and write in votes count, who's to say they wouldn't write in BHO as VP? This opens up the chance of BHO being president again under a couple of different circumstances.

    1. In the event of a Romney death.

    2. And Obama can legally run again in 2016 as a VP candidate.
     
    #11 concretefuzzynuts, Oct 30, 2012
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2012
  12. MZBKA

    MZBKA
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2004
    2,212
    0
    Yes, we should give it up.

    People here arguing for the electoral college are arguing we should keep it because it helps keep their party in power. I can't think of anything more un-American.
     
  13. concretefuzzynuts

    concretefuzzynuts
    Expand Collapse
    Brew Crew

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2011
    7,475
    13
    Location:
    PNW
    Our system of government is set up as a Representative Republic. The Electoral College is part of that.
     
  14. Vic777

    Vic777
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2006
    3,604
    494
    If you want the New York Dumocrats and the California Filmmakers to be controlling the Country (and destroying it), sure, get rid of the Electoral College. You must be a lieberal living off my taxes.
     
  15. Vic777

    Vic777
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2006
    3,604
    494
    Like you don't want the Dumocrats in power so you can live off my taxes and hard work! Lieberals lie to themselves as much as they lie to honest Americans.
     
  16. pmcjury

    pmcjury
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2008
    713
    2
    I don't think they are the same thing at all. It still keeps the electoral college votes per state the same, which keeps high population states from completely over ruling lower population states, but let's the minority within a state still be heard.

    Sent from my ADR6410LVW using Tapatalk 2
     
  17. Gundude

    Gundude
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2003
    7,379
    469
    There is the distinct possibility next week that Romney will win the popular vote and Obama the EC. We'll then see how many fans it still has here.
     
  18. SCmasterblaster

    SCmasterblaster
    Expand Collapse
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 1999
    17,767
    541
    Location:
    Hartford, Vermont
    It is still the best way. Each state votes for its electors. The majority still rules, state by state.
     
    #18 SCmasterblaster, Oct 30, 2012
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2012
  19. countrygun

    countrygun
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2012
    17,069
    17
    2 states have apportionment of EC reps, the other 48 are "winner take all. It would be a definate improvement if more would swing to a representative apportionment. In Oregon and washington States it usually runs about 60/40 or closer with the Dems winning and taking all the votes. A change would also be beneficial to the third parties.
     
  20. czsmithGT

    czsmithGT
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2004
    10,823
    1,332
    Not exactly. The representatives of each state have one vote, so the person to win would be whichever party has the most either Repub majority states or Dem majority states in the House. Probably would still end up being Romney but it isn't a simple matter of which party has the most representatives.
     
    #20 czsmithGT, Oct 30, 2012
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2012