close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Scientists find new evidence supporting John the Baptist bones theory

Discussion in 'Religious Issues' started by Smacktard, Jun 18, 2012.

  1. janice6

    janice6 Silver Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    34,401
    Likes Received:
    19,563
    Location:
    minnesota
    Pretty specific conclusion for time dating
     

  2. English

    English

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2005
    Messages:
    4,585
    Likes Received:
    42
    Location:
    London
    Different bits of him scattered around in Bulgaria, Montenegro and Damascus. I didn't know they had 10mms that long ago! Sounds as though he might have been on Cyprus when he was shot.

    English
     
  3. Vic Hays

    Vic Hays

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2002
    Messages:
    10,135
    Likes Received:
    182
    Location:
    My home is in heaven
    It is not likely that these bones are those of John the Baptist. The veneration of saints and relics did not occur until later centuries. I believe the story said something like 5th century church.

    Even if they are authentic they are of no significance.

    What is of significance is what John did and was recorded in the Bible.
     
  4. Bren

    Bren NRA Life Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Messages:
    44,569
    Likes Received:
    12,939
    Location:
    Kentucky
    I agree with Vic Hays that it means nothing to the overall competition between religions, non-religions, etc., since nobody really claims that these various saints didn't exist. I can see this being interesting to Catholics, but otherwise it's about as important as the debate over whether Daniel Boone's bones are really buried in his grave in KY.
     
    Last edited: Jun 18, 2012