close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

Remington R51 - extremely disappointed

Discussion in 'General Firearms Forum' started by bac1023, Mar 15, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. bac1023

    bac1023

    102,314
    2,689
    Sep 26, 2004
    PA
    I handled one last night. I was going to buy one before that.

    You would think Remington would have introduced a pistol that was a bit more polished. I was really put off. The extremely gritty, cheap trigger and the loud "clicky" grip safety were bad enough, but the fact that it feels like there's coarse sand paper between the slide and frame was the deal breaker for me.

    Even if it cost a little more, I think Remington should have put a little more work into this. The gun feels very unfinished and rushed. :dunno:

    The original 51 from 100+ years ago was a very well built pistol. This gun is an insult to the name, in my opinion. What a piece of junk. To think some people actually spent over $700 for the first couple on Gunbroker makes me cringe. :shocked:
     
    Last edited: Mar 15, 2014
  2. Beanie-Bean

    Beanie-Bean

    4,578
    69
    Apr 23, 2011
    Central Texas
    Wow...appreciate the feedback, Brian. I was actually looking forward to checking one out in person. Haven't seen one locally yet, but I'll be sure to check fit/finish on it.
     


  3. bac1023

    bac1023

    102,314
    2,689
    Sep 26, 2004
    PA
    Sounds good, Mike

    They have not gotten great reviews, but maybe the one I handled was worse than most...
     
  4. I'm disappointed to hear this. I was so looking forward to possibly getting one. tom. :crying:
     
  5. M2 Carbine

    M2 Carbine

    21,450
    4,609
    Dec 21, 2002
    Texas
    Well that stinks.

    Just this morning, at the gun store, we were talking about the R51.
    I said I'd probably want the first one.

    Since I got the first (and only) G42 they got, maybe I'll give someone else the "honor" of getting the first R51.:upeyes:
     
  6. bac1023

    bac1023

    102,314
    2,689
    Sep 26, 2004
    PA
    Maybe it will perform well for you, M2 :dunno:

    I think you'll share my opinion when you see it though...
     
  7. Lt. Donn

    Lt. Donn PSO Survivor

    590
    328
    Aug 1, 2012
    La Mesa, NM
    Let's hope for two things:
    1. that Remington has someone reading these posts
    2. That it was an "early" production model
     
  8. DRJ1911

    DRJ1911

    464
    0
    Jun 30, 2011
    I handled one this week and agree with everything Bac said. The action was very rough and made all kind of sounds while racking the slide. It kind of felt like the hitches in a Mini 14 action. Not for me.

    Doyle
     
  9. Maybe that's why it only costs ~$400? If it were more properly polished and smoothed out, I'm sure it would cost more.
     
  10. NeverMore1701

    NeverMore1701 Fear no Evil Platinum Member

    38,390
    3,714
    Jun 25, 2004
    Amarillo, Tx
    I hope the get these problems fixed, as it's otherwise very appealing.
     
  11. raven11

    raven11

    8,758
    6
    Jan 27, 2009
    Illinois
    Thanks for the initial impressions, when some of the initials reviews were harsh there was a lot of backlash but now since they started selling to the public and it looks like we have everything from won't cycle 115g , biting your shooting hand, and now bad workmanship, i'm glad I got my shield

    my S&W Shield doesn't sound like that
     
  12. GlockFanWA

    GlockFanWA

    722
    12
    Sep 9, 2012
    Washington
    Guess I'll wait for generation 2 and see how it is.
     
  13. RonS

    RonS Millennium Member

    12,511
    2,197
    May 27, 1999
    Oh, USA
    Sad to hear, I was looking forward to trying one out, I think it would be a great size for my wife, being a metal frame and all.
     
  14. DonD

    DonD

    3,684
    544
    Dec 21, 2001
    Central TX
    Well, that’s a bummer. When a new gun gets such a thumbs down from Bac, I’m unlikely to show much interest in the gun. I’m not in need of something new but like all gun enthusiasts, need has little to do with it! :supergrin: Don
     
  15. itstime

    itstime

    7,176
    17
    Apr 9, 2006
    USA
    Bummer. I was looking forward to getting one. I've been hearing some bad news on it though. I'll probably have to pass.
     
  16. bac1023

    bac1023

    102,314
    2,689
    Sep 26, 2004
    PA
    It certainly would cost a little more, but it would be well worth it. In my opinion, there's no way a new pistol from Remington should be that rough, regardless of cost.
     
  17. what a bummer, I was hoping to hear good things about this gun. what are your plans for this piece. are you going to try cleaning it up? maybe a little elbow grease and polish? let us know how it turns out:cool:
     
  18. bac1023

    bac1023

    102,314
    2,689
    Sep 26, 2004
    PA
    Sorry to be sour grapes, guys. :wavey:

    When I saw it in the case I was actually going to buy it and for once in my life, be one of the first to own a new to the market pistol. Then I handled it and all bets were off...

    If it performed well, I imagine the roughness could be tolerated for the price. However, the reviews by people who actually fired the gun don't seem to be too good so far.
     
  19. bac1023

    bac1023

    102,314
    2,689
    Sep 26, 2004
    PA
    I didn't buy it, my friend. :)

    After reading some reviews from those who have, I'm glad I didn't.
     
  20. Bruce M

    Bruce M

    39,364
    10,131
    Jan 3, 2010
    S FL
    The way I read his post I do not think Brian got one. I would like to handle one at some point but his review moved it far down on my list.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.