close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Remember, when someone says...

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by railfancwb, Jun 28, 2013.


  1. railfancwb

    railfancwb
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    7,111
    755
    Location:
    Shelbyville, Tennessee TN
  2. jeanderson

    jeanderson
    Expand Collapse
    Toga!... Toga!
    Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2012
    5,245
    2,986
    Location:
    A planet with no sign of intelligent life
    I'm not getting the "it's not about money" angle here. The Supreme Court decision on DOMA is about discrimination. To me, the advocates for the "Respect for Marriage" act are trying to usurp the rights of states to define marriage.
     

  3. Kablam

    Kablam
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2005
    3,273
    313
    So the striking down of DOMA didn't remedy discrimination against gay married couples as neatly as I was told in another thread here. Now we need a "respect for marriage act" to fix it. So, MORE legislation is needed because we don't want to fix the more basic problem of giving benefits to the "married class" that the "unmarried class" is denied. This is just one example how the gov dividing society along arbitrary lines and deciding which group deserves special treatment is a bad idea. And, of course, it is at least in part about the money.
     
  4. FLIPPER 348

    FLIPPER 348
    Expand Collapse
    Happy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    22,678
    2,894
    Location:
    Bend Oregon

    exactly

    ....why else would all the homos want to be 'married'??
     
  5. railfancwb

    railfancwb
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    7,111
    755
    Location:
    Shelbyville, Tennessee TN
  6. ArtificialGrape

    ArtificialGrape
    Expand Collapse
    CLM

    Joined:
    May 9, 2007
    5,823
    0
    Location:
    Colorado Springs
    I'm sure if the 1136 benefits afforded to married couples suddenly went away there would be no public outcry from the heterosexuals, because for heterosexuals it's not about money.
     
  7. ChuteTheMall

    ChuteTheMall
    Expand Collapse
    HildabeastHater

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2000
    51,128
    49,256
    Location:
    Anti-Obamaville
    Why does the government give special rights, privileges and tax breaks to married couples, while denying them to single people?

    Is this a legitimate and necessary purpose of government?
     
  8. ArtificialGrape

    ArtificialGrape
    Expand Collapse
    CLM

    Joined:
    May 9, 2007
    5,823
    0
    Location:
    Colorado Springs
    I guess you'd have to ask the 84% married Congress :dunno:
     
  9. certifiedfunds

    certifiedfunds
    Expand Collapse
    Tewwowist

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2008
    51,670
    4,144
    Location:
    Houston
    No...

    The government shouldn't even know if you are married


    Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
     
    #9 certifiedfunds, Jun 28, 2013
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2013
  10. Kablam

    Kablam
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2005
    3,273
    313
    Ding ding!

    Thank you. Someone besides me finally said it.
     
    #10 Kablam, Jun 29, 2013
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2013