There have been several fatal shootings in the papers and on the TV news recently (vid. the mass shooting at the beer distributors warehouse) but the one that has seemed to generate the most public anger is about the guy who went to a dog park and used his 9mm Glock loaded with hydroshock bullets in a fatal shooting. Apparently he was off duty (federal cop of some sort) and felt his life and the life of his wife was in danger. However, there appear to be no credible eye witnesses (that have come forth). There is some question if he was legally allowed to carry in MD. On a number of forum discussions, I've noted that people discuss scenarios in which they might or might not use deadly force. I doubt that this scenario has been discussed often in the past. If you think that drawing your weapon, or firing your weapon, or killing something with your weapon is going to result in an open and shut case, this event suggests that you may be underestimating the public response to the use of deadly force. Check out the links and then post your comments... Police question if carry was legal http://articles.baltimoresun.com/20...100806-1_1_bear-bear-dog-park-police-question http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/ma...bear-bear-shooting-20100806-1,0,5935972.story Police report http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/features/mutts/blog/2010/08/original_bearbear_police_repor.html Hydroshock killing bullet http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/features/mutts/blog/2010/08/the_bullet_used_to_kill_bearbe.html Editorial asking for investigation http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/editorial/bs-ed-dog-shooting-20100805,0,5950094.story Story on Facebook and thousands sign petition http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/features/mutts/blog/2010/08/members_pour_in_to_facebook_pa.html Wanna kill these ads? We can help!