close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Range report of various .40 loads

Discussion in 'Caliber Corner' started by Henry's Dad, Nov 1, 2012.


Tags:
  1. Henry's Dad

    Henry's Dad
    Expand Collapse
    woof, woof

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2011
    820
    2
    Location:
    Upriver of 3 Mile Island
    Hi all,

    It's been a while since I've had any real serious range time, so I took the afternoon and decided to blow through a bunch of different boxes I've stacked up over the past year (from gun shows, sales at Cabela's, WalMart bargains, etc.).

    There is absolutely nothing scientific about the data. It's just my personal impression of the stuff I had sitting in the cabinet after a year of not shooting much.

    The "fps/energy" ratings (where given) were from whatever was either on the box or what I found online. I did not personally chrono any of this ammo. Just thought I'd list it as a point of reference.

    This exercise really underscored for me the importance of getting a load that just feels right. Worry about who has the latest and greatest bullet design later. Some of these loads I could shoot all day. Others I never want to touch again.

    My ratings/rankings here are really all about the highly subjective "feel" of the rounds for me. Feel includes: how much I enjoyed shooting the ammo, how quickly I was getting back on target between shots, and how tight my groups looked when I was done.

    All shots taken from my G23 (my EDC) @ 7 yards, indoor range.

    I did a similar exercise with .357 mag ammo from my new SP101. Will have this info up soon in a separate post.

    Enjoy.

    ------------------------

    Liked:
    Hornady 155 gr XTP; #9132; 1180/479; very tight group, all in 8 ring; like a lot


    Federal 155 gr JHP XM40HB; 1150/455; some kick but very tight grouping, all inside 8 ring


    Federal Classic 180 gr Hi-shok JHP “40SWA”; snappy but nice; 20 shots w/ 3 in 7 ring, but good center mass grouping


    Federal 165 gr hydra-shock JHP; P40HS3G; 980/352; nice, not too snappy; 20 rounds all inside 8 ring


    Winchester Ranger 155 gr JHP, “RA40”, nice and solid but not snappy; good center mass grouping within 7 ring w/ 25 rounds


    Didn’t like:
    Winchester Ranger 135 gr JHP “Q4368” bad patterning, high and left, 20 shots


    Winchester Supreme Elite 165 JHP Bonded Personal Protection; do not like, too punchy/snappy; 20 rounds


    Hornady TAP FTP 180 gr. a little snappy but not terrible; 950/361, good center mass grouping but just didn't "feel" great

    -----------------------------
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
  2. NEOH212

    NEOH212
    Expand Collapse
    Diesel Girl

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    8,983
    5
    Location:
    North East Ohio
    If you get a chance, give the Ranger T-Series 165 grain a try. Also, check out the 165 grain Speer Gold Dot.

    Both are fantastic performing rounds with a great track record. I get nearly 1,150 fps from my Glock 22 with both loads. (The actual velocity was something like 1,146 fps but I rounded up for the sake of simplicity.)

    Those numbers should be pretty close to what you can expect out of your G23.
     

  3. Tiro Fijo

    Tiro Fijo
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    6,281
    5
    If you ain't shootin' a ragged hole at 7 yds. even with the crappiest of ammo it's the Indian & not the arrow.
     
  4. SCmasterblaster

    SCmasterblaster
    Expand Collapse
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 1999
    16,941
    393
    Location:
    Hartford, Vermont
    For the ammo report! :cool:
     
  5. greenlion

    greenlion
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2009
    937
    12
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Thanks for the info. I need to get around to trying some of the newer 155 grain loads. I usually shoot the 180's and 165's.
     
  6. cowboy1964

    cowboy1964
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    18,660
    1,260
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    155gr is too snappy and shallow penetrating for my taste.

    I agree that at 7 yards there really shouldn't be any difference in accuracy between ammo types. But I swear some ARE more accurate. But I can't shoot enough rounds to truly do a scientific test.

    I expected a lot more kick from the Winchester 135gr JHP but they are quite mild.
     
    #6 cowboy1964, Nov 1, 2012
    Last edited: Nov 1, 2012
  7. digilo

    digilo
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    307
    0
    Location:
    texas
    Thanks for the report HD. I shot some Win PDX1 a week ago or so at the range, both 165 and 180, and the 180 was a little milder to shoot.
     
  8. bobtheelf

    bobtheelf
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2012
    683
    39
    Location:
    Nashville
    I found the same to be true. I much prefer the feel of the 180g.
     
  9. SCmasterblaster

    SCmasterblaster
    Expand Collapse
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 1999
    16,941
    393
    Location:
    Hartford, Vermont
    I am getting a G22 soon. I'll definitely try the 180s.
     
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
P229 - range report w/three more loads! TOP GUNS *357 Sig* Club Sep 3, 2014
Range report on several .357 mag loads Caliber Corner Nov 1, 2012
Boston butts vs. various .40 loads Caliber Corner Aug 5, 2012
Range report, sort of. Okie Memorial Area Feb 22, 2011
Worked up some Autocomp loads-range report Reloading Apr 13, 2010
Duty Gear at CopsPlus