close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Poll on mandatory helmet law.

Discussion in 'Moto Club' started by minuteman32, Sep 14, 2007.

  1. minuteman32

    minuteman32 NRA & GOA Life

    607
    0
    Aug 20, 2004
    Central IN.
  2. whogasak47

    whogasak47 JPFO-GOA

    620
    0
    Sep 1, 2005
    N E Louisiana

  3. fnfalman

    fnfalman Chicks Dig It

    51,453
    3,822
    Oct 23, 2000
    California & New Mexico, US
    I'd like to see a national helmet law for the cagers too. Then we'll see how much they like wearing the helmet.

    Freaking do-gooders. I hate them worse than I hate Islamic radicals and commies.:upeyes:
     
  4. epsylum

    epsylum Boolit Hoze

    3,868
    2
    Sep 4, 2004
    Racing Capital, USA
    Am I the only one that thinks a lot of these laws (helmet law, seatbelt law, etc.) can be handled by insurance companies? Put clauses in the contracts that say if you have a wreck and it is found you did not have a helmet or seatbelt on then you are responsible for your medical bills and allow those that don't use them pay higher rates to have that wording left out.

    Then you could just let the free market control it. Its the American way damn it! :supergrin:

    I mean I wear both helmets and seatbelts but I REALLY don't like the laws forcing us to wear them.
     
  5. NMGlocker

    NMGlocker BOOM headshot

    2,014
    0
    Jun 29, 2001
    New Mexico
    Good idea.
    Put in additional discounts for wearing CE approved armor and i'd have some cheap insurance.
    Let the Ray-Ban, cargo shorts,flip-flop wearing riders subsidize my rates.
    :thumbsup:
     
  6. epsylum

    epsylum Boolit Hoze

    3,868
    2
    Sep 4, 2004
    Racing Capital, USA
    Subsidize? You are paying for them now and IMO you shouldn't be. Part of your rates are paying for people who get into wrecks without the right equipment on leading to much more extensive bodily damage.

    I don't care if you want to ride naked, I just don't want to pay for your accident indirectly through my insurance rates (and I also don't want to see you unless you are hot chick ;) ). I also don't want daddy government deciding they have to tell us how to live our lives.
     
  7. NMGlocker

    NMGlocker BOOM headshot

    2,014
    0
    Jun 29, 2001
    New Mexico
    I was agreeing with you.
    Right now I subsidize the idiots... lower MY rates for wearing the correct gear, raise the rates of the Doo-rag crew, now THEY are subsidizing my insurance.
     
  8. Ralphumor

    Ralphumor NRA Life Member

    369
    0
    Mar 22, 2004
    KY
    I just keep thinking, It is legal to carry a gun in you state. You can carry it but just dont get in a gun fight cause we wont cover your medical cost. Yes I know that we are paying for dumb butts who dont wear helments. There are fellas that think I am a dumb butt because I dont wear leather 100% of the time. They would be right but I dont. Laws cant protect us from dumb selves.
     
  9. RMTactical

    RMTactical www.AR15pro.net CLM

    12,603
    16
    Oct 7, 2000
    Behind an AR-15
    Not wearing a helmet is stupid, but I disagree with laws making it mandatory. I feel the same way about seatbelt laws. Good to wear a seatbelt, wrong to be forced to.
     
  10. Tennessee Slim

    Tennessee Slim Señor Member CLM

    4,413
    0
    Apr 14, 2004
    Mucus City, USA
    No! to helmet and seatbelt laws.

    Yes! to allowing insurance companies to reduce benefits to those injured/killed in an MVA if they weren't utilizing all appropriate safety measures.
     
  11. Egyas

    Egyas Troll Hater

    Here's my take on it (as a non cycle rider/driver)...

    1) I'm against mandatory helmet AND seatbelt laws for adults. In favor of them for minors. Adults have the right to make their own choices and rick their lives. Minors need to be protected, often from themselves.

    2) I think forcing other drivers/riders to pay for unsafe drivers/riders is silly. I am in favor of allowing insurance companies to tell riders that if they don't wear proper safety gear (the insurance company would be required to define "proper" in their ToS) then they do NOT have to pay out for accidents, injuries, etc.
     
  12. epsylum

    epsylum Boolit Hoze

    3,868
    2
    Sep 4, 2004
    Racing Capital, USA
    I know you were. Sorry if it came off some other way.
     
  13. Lewsid 13

    Lewsid 13 Senior Member

    427
    0
    Jan 25, 2007
    I like the idea about the insurance companies limiting coverage based upon whether one wears protective gear or not.

    I personally always wear a helmet and leather jacket, however I don't think I should be forced to!
     
  14. bdhawk

    bdhawk

    1,350
    1
    Mar 18, 2000
    i look at it from another perspective. if someone has an accident without a helmet, and he has a serious head injury, they will eventually/probabally become a ward of the state. as a taxpayer, i am not so sure i like that idea.
     
  15. Egyas

    Egyas Troll Hater


    That's an easy fix. If you become disabled because you';re a fu#$%ng idiot, YOU foot the bills. No assistance for the stupid.
     
  16. Tennessee Slim

    Tennessee Slim Señor Member CLM

    4,413
    0
    Apr 14, 2004
    Mucus City, USA
    PAY the stupid tax!!!

    It should be a constitutional amendment.