Mas, First and foremost, thanks for being a member here. I truly appreciate and respect what you do. I have many of your books and writings and enjoy your advice on the personal defense tv show. That aside, I was wondering in your professional opinion, as a civilian does it really matter what self defense ammo I carry in the eyes of the courts? Meaning, are they more inclined to be more leanient if one was to use say Hornady Critical Defense ammo because it is marketed as "defense only" and for civilians versus say Ranger +p+, which is clearly geared towards LEO. I am under the impression that the latter would have better terminal balistic results and surely more street credit, but I am not LEO. Should non-LEO's refrain from carrying what the LEO's carry? Am I overthinking it? If the shooting was justifiable would it even matter? Thanks.