close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Permit holder charged with failure to notify Officer

Discussion in 'Carry Issues' started by TBO, Feb 10, 2012.


  1. TBO

    TBO
    Expand Collapse
    Why so serious?
    CLM
    1. The Outpost Lounge

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    43,234
    12,263
    Location:
    3500 Cedar Ave S. Minneapolis, MN 55407
  2. RussP

    RussP
    Expand Collapse
    Moderator
    1. The JBT's

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    33,115
    2,416
    Location:
    Central Virginia
    Well, the sequence of events went something like this:
    • Made a lane change without signaling.
    • Noticeable increased speed after lane change.
    • Clocked at 82 in a 60 MPH zone.
    • When stopped by police, alcohol on breath.
    • Did not inform officer of carry permit and firearms in the back seat.
    • Officer runs info, comes back showing driver has carry permit...
    • Resulting charges:
      • Fifth-degree felony transporting weapons while intoxicated,
      • Fifth-degree felony improper transport of firearms and
      • Failure to inform an officer
      • OVI
      • OVI test refusal
      • speeding and
      • not signaling a lane change.
    oops...
     

  3. HerrGlock

    HerrGlock
    Expand Collapse
    Scouts Out
    CLM

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2000
    23,791
    182
    Sounds like someone they should publish his prom picture and say how he was turning his life around :supergrin:
     
  4. Patchman

    Patchman
    Expand Collapse
    Florist

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    17,017
    2,263
    Location:
    Land of Flora, Fauna & Merriweather
    Oh. Well.
     
  5. Dragoon44

    Dragoon44
    Expand Collapse
    Unfair Facist
    Lifetime Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2005
    18,871
    1,750
    So what is his GT screen name?

    :whistling::rofl:
     
  6. walt cowan

    walt cowan
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    10,597
    1,210
    Location:
    Absurdistan
    can't be gunkid, no permit and still doing time at club fed.:supergrin:
     
  7. James Dean

    James Dean
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    2,247
    11
    Location:
    East of Eden
    I'd say he's got a problem.
     
  8. cpelliott

    cpelliott
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    268
    0
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    His lawyer should be able to get the failure to inform thrown out, because the 2 charges related to the transport clearly indicate that he would be testifying against himself by informing.

    That is the crazy thing about failure to inform laws. They can only be used against people who are carrying perfectly legally.
     
  9. RussP

    RussP
    Expand Collapse
    Moderator
    1. The JBT's

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    33,115
    2,416
    Location:
    Central Virginia
    Really? Do you have some case law supporting that?
    Well, there are other laws to take care of those carrying illegally.
     
  10. Bill Lumberg

    Bill Lumberg
    Expand Collapse
    BTF Inventor

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2002
    6,845
    9
    Once they fail to inform, they're no longer legal, in this jurisdiction.
     
  11. RussP

    RussP
    Expand Collapse
    Moderator
    1. The JBT's

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    33,115
    2,416
    Location:
    Central Virginia
    That's what I was thinking.
     
  12. RichardinNC

    RichardinNC
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2004
    613
    1
    Location:
    Near the edge
     
    #12 RichardinNC, Feb 10, 2012
    Last edited: Feb 10, 2012
  13. cpelliott

    cpelliott
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    268
    0
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Are you saying you don't understand how duty to inform are not enforceable when the underlying activity is criminal? Any law that demands reporting or licensing can only be enforced to the extent that they don't require self incrimination.

    As an example in Haynes v US, Haynes was charged with failure to register an NFA firearm. Since he was a felon, registering would be an act of self incrimination. SCOTUS agreed 7 to 1. The NFA was later modified to fix this. It's OK to make possession of something illegal. It's not OK to make the failure to report an illegal act a criminal violation.

    The 5th amendment issue is why most states don't have duty to inform laws for firearms. It can sink an entire case. Say someone follows the law and self incriminates to follow the law. A search turns up a dead body in the trunk. It could all be fruit of the poisonous tree.

    So back to my original point. Duty to inform laws essentially only affect law abiding citizens. People with illegal weapons do get charged, but the conflict with the 5th amendment is pretty easy to prove in court.
     
  14. AA#5

    AA#5
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2008
    5,099
    0
    Teehee. His defense:

    "Your Honor, the failure to inform charge should be dropped because I was drunk at the time & we all know what alcohol does to memory."
     
  15. RussP

    RussP
    Expand Collapse
    Moderator
    1. The JBT's

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    33,115
    2,416
    Location:
    Central Virginia
    So are you advising someone to just not tell law enforcement anything, even if required by law if they want to carry illegally?
     
  16. cpelliott

    cpelliott
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    268
    0
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    I can't seem to find any such advice in the thread. My comments concern the legal issues of failure to inform laws. For some reason I can't figure out, a few people seem to regard the discussion as threatening. From the responses, it is clear that additional comment would not useful.
     
  17. JuneyBooney

    JuneyBooney
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2009
    18,216
    3
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    He will get a lot thrown out and the carrying guns will be pbj or thrown out. A van/suv has no place to lock a gun so you throw them on a seat. But I think they will plea him out to a guilty on the drinking and then some classes. That is a guess. They really treat drunks seriously now. The leo took the "shotgun approach" to the charges. :whistling:
     
  18. JuneyBooney

    JuneyBooney
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2009
    18,216
    3
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    I agree but they use the failure to inform as pc to go "fishing". :whistling:
     
  19. Ryobi

    Ryobi
    Expand Collapse
    SummertimeRules

    Joined:
    May 10, 2002
    2,177
    2
    RS, not PC. And there's nothing wrong with someone breaking the law constituting RS. Break the law, and win prizes.
     
  20. RussP

    RussP
    Expand Collapse
    Moderator
    1. The JBT's

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    33,115
    2,416
    Location:
    Central Virginia
    I didn't say it is there, therefore I asked the question to clarify. Again, would it be your advice that if one chooses to carry illegally, as in this scenario, one should not make statements that would reveal the illegal carry?
    Yes.
    Who exactly do you believe feels threatened by the discussion. We can ask them if they do and why.

    Why isn't the 5th amendment issue brought up in must inform states and used to overturn existing or defeat new legislation?