Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

Perceptions of a jury

Discussion in 'GATE Self-Defense Forum' started by PittsburghFrank, Aug 17, 2010.

  1. Hi Mas,
    I am interested in knowing your opinion about the use of 9mm Corbon DPX versus Gold Dot 124 +P as related to evidence at a jury trial from a shooting.

    The Gold Dot is made with a more standard material of lead, and is used much more commonly than the DPX.

    With the DPX having a different technology (all copper bullet), in your opinion, would there be any problems with a jury’s perception of it being a “man killer.” Put another way, would there be any increase of risks with a jury by carrying a gun loaded with DPX over the more standard Gold Dot?

    Thanks in advance for your comments.
  2. Mas Ayoob

    Mas Ayoob KoolAidAntidote Moderator

    Nov 6, 2005
    Frank, juries only get taken in by "Extra Deadly Gun" and "Extra Deadly Bullet" arguments are not effectively rebutted by the defense. I imagine any competent expert witness could explain the rationale of the DPX and why it is safer for bystanders, etc, just as they would for the Gold Dot. It's when it is not explained that the argument tends to sway juries untutored in such things. Do a search on GT for the many discussions of how this impacted the trial jury in the Harold Fish case.