Panetta: Obama Absent Night of Benghazi

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by ERASER, Feb 7, 2013.


  1. ERASER

    ERASER Nyuk,Nyuk,Nyuk!

  2. Y'all racists quit picking on little ole Barry 0. Didn't you get the memo that his is our first affirmative action potus and therefor untouchable?

    In a related story
    Where Was Waldo...er... I mean Hillary?

    I often used to see this style of aloof management in which managers insulated themselves from the day to day goings on. It was most often used by those who desired an element of plausible deniability in order to avoid all resonsibility for things gone awry, but their title still allowed them to claim credit when by chance something good happened. It worked pretty good to build resumes, but didn't do much for the companies they destroyed. It's working well for Barry, too. Just look at all the fawning press he gets. :rofl:
     

  3. In that the press has no interest in the story, and to the contrary, they cover for the president and his administration,all of this unfortunately goes nowhere..
     
  4. He knew they were under attack during a meeting at about 5pm, then according to Panetta, he had no more communication with Obama while Americans including an ambassador were being murdered by Al Qaeda. He needs to be impeached.
     
  5. His (and the Secretary of State's) lack of curiosity about what was going on is stunning. I doubt we hear much about this in the MSM. He obviously did not care about the fate of people he is responsible for. Scum of the Earth. Impeachment would be appropriate.
     
  6. Panetta, AKA the worried/constipated dwarf, is abent almost all the freaking time... taking his lead from his freaking boss.

    FORE!
     
  7. This, the truth, explains the desperate and useless coverup that followed the incident.
     
  8. Sounds like Panetta may not be pleased with some of the things took place and getting it off his chest as he exits.
     
  9. guard dog media....
     
  10. Geez...This time, Obama couldn't even say, "Present." [​IMG]


    .
     
  11. Rand Paul kind of tried to get at the truth in his questioning of Clinton but he did a terrible job of it.

    Best guess is Benghazi was a CIA and State Department operation to funnel guns to Syrian opposition through Turkey and that is why the whole Obama administration have been doing their best to cover it up from Sept 11.

    There was a time when decent investigative journalists would have been all over this story since it involved a US Ambassador/possible CIA operative killed in action. The truth could have been uncovered by those willing to look. Now, those journalists don't exist.
     
  12. He should be impeached, but in this crazy world instead of that we will probably get another federal department to make sure this doesn't happen again.
     
  13. happyguy

    happyguy Man, I'm Pretty

    Good lord people, he had to get a good nights sleep don't you remember? He had a very important fund raiser in Nevada the next day.

    Bengahzi schmengahzi!

    Regards,
    Comrade Happyguy :)
     
    #14 happyguy, Feb 7, 2013
    Last edited: Feb 7, 2013
  14. Harry Truman----------The buck stops here
    Slick Willie-------------Gorsh, the buck never got here
    Zero-------------------What's a buck?
     
  15. He is trying to run interference for Obama and Hillary. He is a loyal Democrat and a disloyal American.
     
    #16 DonGlock26, Feb 8, 2013
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2013
  16. If that's it then he is a loyal 'team player' and should get an Oscar, Nobel, something.
     

Share This Page