close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Older USPs

Discussion in 'Heckler & Koch Forum' started by Henry's Dad, Nov 19, 2012.

  1. Henry's Dad

    Henry's Dad woof, woof

    Have USPs gone through "gen" upgrades (or downgrades, depending on your point of view:whistling:) the way Glock has?

    Any parts compatability issues between USPs from the '90s and ones made today?

    Any issues with used USPs in general that a buyer should be aware of? Were there "bad" years or a bad string of years?
     
  2. NEOH212

    NEOH212 Diesel Girl

    8,983
    12
    Mar 25, 2008
    North East Ohio
    The only thing I'm aware of was the firing pin problem in the USP Compacts that were built before 2004.

    Other than that, I don't think much else has changed. Reliability and durability wise, the USP is at least twice the gun that the Glocks are and have ever been.
     

  3. barth

    barth six barrels

    6,655
    676
    Oct 7, 2011
    The Free Zone

    Courtesy of HKPRO:
    "What were the changes H&K made to USP over the years?"

    1993: Original USP9 and .40.

    1994: Reduced the slide weight by 1.1 oz.

    1994-95: Change to a polygonal rifled barrel (Prior barrels were standard land and groove)

    1994-95: Change trigger transfer bar.

    1994-95: Change recoil guide rod to a "captured spring version".

    1995: Change trigger mechanism.

    1995-96: Add rubber spur to hammer.

    1995-96: Change angle on slide lock.

    2000: Add locking feature to hammer strut support.

    2001: Converted captive recoil spring retainer from c-clip to machined end on USP Compacts.
     
    Last edited: Nov 19, 2012
  4. WT

    WT Millennium Member

    3,100
    617
    Jan 12, 1999
    USA
    The early Compact 9mm and .40 cal had some horrible triggers - gritty and heavy. It was improved with the later issue .45 USP Compact. A good polishing of the trigger system in the early models would improve the action.

    Secondly, on 2001 Ayoob pointed out that there were some failures to fire using 9mm Winchester White Box in the 9mm USP Compact. Apparently some lubricant got into the firing pin channel which would not allow enough force to light up the Winchester standard pressure round. It only happened occasionally, not all the time. Maybe it has been fixed by now.
     
    Last edited: Nov 20, 2012
  5. .45 Combat

    .45 Combat

    293
    0
    Oct 29, 2005
    This helps me. I was wondering the same thing myself.
     
  6. ca survivor

    ca survivor

    8,503
    100
    Dec 25, 2011
    Florida
  7. bac1023

    bac1023

    104,055
    3,496
    Sep 26, 2004
    PA
    Thanks for the info.
     
  8. OlliesRevenge

    OlliesRevenge

    644
    6
    Apr 26, 2012
    WA
    Do tell, I have never heard of this, and own a USP 40 Compact.
     
  9. OlliesRevenge

    OlliesRevenge

    644
    6
    Apr 26, 2012
    WA
    Sorry duplicate post
     
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2012
  10. MadMonkey

    MadMonkey Spershul Furces

    2,750
    2
    Aug 18, 2010
    TX
    I love wild gun claims :whistling:

    I love my USPC9 and USP45... never thought they were significantly better than my Glocks though. All I know is that I can't shoot the 45 nearly as well as my G19 :rofl:
     
  11. brisk21

    brisk21

    4,206
    16
    May 13, 2008
    Michigan


    :rofl::rofl::rofl:
    Oh, c'mon! Twice the gun? GTFO. I own both and they are both excellent. Enough said.
     
  12. sns3guppy

    sns3guppy

    5,000
    1,245
    Sep 4, 2006
    The USP .45 Compact has a lousy double action trigger, too. It improves somewhat with use, but it's nothing to write home about.
     
  13. WT

    WT Millennium Member

    3,100
    617
    Jan 12, 1999
    USA
    I forgot to mention that the early USP's had a HK specific light rail. Only HK lights would attach to the pistol. Later they changed the light rail design to accept the more commonly available lights made by other manufacturers.
     
  14. Slobo

    Slobo

    32
    0
    Jul 17, 2012
    Virginia
    Thought the USPs still had that HK rail. I have a USP .45, not too old judging by the later hangrips, and I had to get a GG&G mount for it.
     
  15. WT

    WT Millennium Member

    3,100
    617
    Jan 12, 1999
    USA
    I'm working off of memory here so you may be right.

    I used to collect magazine articles about the USP and thought I saw a rail change mentioned in one of them. I no longer have those articles.

    My personal USP dates back to 1998 and I know the series underwent some changes since then.

    Regardless, it is a very robust and reliable firearm. I can only remember 1 failure to feed from a magazine with a tired spring.

    I really cannot complain about the USP.
     
  16. Slobo

    Slobo

    32
    0
    Jul 17, 2012
    Virginia
    Me neither. My USP .45 is one of my favorites. Shoots like a dream, very robust and no issues.

    p.s. the GG&G rail convertor adds virtully no weight so leaving it on is no issue.
     
  17. Angel

    Angel

    307
    41
    Jan 4, 2000
    Florida
    I purchased a usp in 9mm when they first became available. It was well made but not accurate. I sold it soon after HK changed the barrel rifling on newer pistols. I would avoid those early guns.
     
  18. pag23

    pag23

    2,304
    742
    Jul 28, 2008
    Eastern PA
    I had to replace my sear spring, but supposely the earlier USP compacts (mine is a 2006 model) this was an issue.

    I will tell you that HK took care of it at no charge!! I just paid the shipping to HK from my LGS.
     
  19. silentpoet

    silentpoet

    26,504
    11,152
    Jan 11, 2007
    This Old Caddy
    When did the lock come into play? Would rather find a pre lock model.
     
  20. mad_glock26

    mad_glock26

    2
    0
    Nov 18, 2012
    I have an AC(02) model .45. Where is the best place to get replacement mag springs?