close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

Off Duty Carry

Discussion in 'GATE Self-Defense Forum' started by Turbodiesel, Feb 15, 2013.

  1. I've heard many times that it is most beneficial for cops to carry either their duty weapon or a compact version of it off duty, because it is the weapon you train with the most etc. I certainly agree with this. However, if the duty weapon is, say, an M&P40, and the off duty weapon is a Glock 23, is that really much of an issue? The weapons have different grip angles, however aside from that they are very similar. No thumb safety, striker fired, etc. If comfortable shooting both, is there any reason to not just carry the 23 as opposed to purchasing an M&P40c? Thanks!
     
  2. Mas Ayoob

    Mas Ayoob KoolAidAntidote Moderator

    4,685
    358
    Nov 6, 2005
    Given that some of us carry an auto as primary and a revolver for backup, it's obviously not a huge issue.

    The same platform -- let's say the M&P40 Compact to supplement the full size duty M&P40 -- allows spare magazine interchangeability, which can be a convenience when switching between duty and off duty gun, and is a potential life-saver when the off-duty is carried as a backup gun. Trigger reach and as you note, grip angle, will be exactly the same.

    But, as you also note, general operation is pretty much the same between the Glock and M&P platforms, unless the latter has manual safety or magazine disconnector safety.

    Up to the individual shooter.

    Best,
    Mas