close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

NYC 'Stop & Frisk'

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by barbedwiresmile, May 12, 2012.

  1. seanmac45

    seanmac45 CLM

    6,790
    4,261
    Apr 13, 2000
    Brooklyn, NY
    "You're under arrest"

    "Fo Wha?"

    "For the thirty jumbos of crack in your pants pocket"

    "Shheeeeiiiiiittt offica you can't arrest me for those"

    "Why not"

    "These ain't my pants. That there crack belongs to the guy what owns these pants"
     
  2. Does Bloomberg ringingly endorse stop and frisks or not? I would say he does. Does Bloomberg, as the chief executive of NYC, have the power to make changes to police procedure? Probably. Is Bloomberg a big government, gun-hating, nanny-stater? Absolutely. So I would say Bloomberg fits into the discussion pretty obviously.

    I can see you are either not grasping or are being purposefully obtuse regarding my position that the legality is not the issue. Meeting the minimum standard under the SC's interpretation has yielded a 12% success rate. For every 1 stop and frisk that nets a criminal violation, 7 citizens are molested by the state under a standard that clearly should be rethought. If you think that's acceptable then you and I have vastly different understanding of what it means to be a free country.
     

  3. Sam Spade

    Sam Spade Staff Member Lifetime Member

    15,171
    2,943
    May 4, 2003
    Or maybe he has a better grasp of "reasonable suspicion" than you do.
     
  4. CAcop

    CAcop

    20,392
    3,008
    Jul 21, 2002
    California
    NYC could tighten the rules but then they would loose those arrests due to officers not being able to conduct Terry stops.

    Don't like Terry stops? Find a place that doesn't do them.

    Good luck with that. Even SF does them. Berkeley might not.
     
  5. CAcop

    CAcop

    20,392
    3,008
    Jul 21, 2002
    California
    Last edited: Jun 2, 2012
  6. BORNGEARHEAD

    BORNGEARHEAD

    1,368
    190
    Mar 3, 2010
    Guilty until proven innocent. Land of the free.
     
  7. TBO

    TBO Why so serious? CLM

    Land of the ignorant, home of the biased.

    Sent from my mind using Tapatalk 2
     
  8. G19G20

    G19G20 Status Quo 2014

    2,004
    0
    May 8, 2011
    Appears the NY State appeals court is starting to reverse convictions based on this Stop and Frisk racial profiling.

    http://news.yahoo.com/ny-appeals-court-vacates-another-stop-frisk-conviction-215018205.html

     
  9. series1811

    series1811 Enforcerator. CLM

  10. G19G20

    G19G20 Status Quo 2014

    2,004
    0
    May 8, 2011
    Claims to be one of the only recordings of a stop and frisk, along with commentary.

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rWtDMPaRD8&feature=player_embedded"]The Hunted and the Hated: An Inside Look at the NYPD's Stop-and-Frisk Policy - YouTube[/ame]#!
     
  11. Bren

    Bren NRA Life Member

    43,505
    11,095
    Jan 16, 2005
    Kentucky
    You mean like where it says:

    That seems to fit with these being Terry stops.

    They complain that the majority of people being stopped are black or Hispanic. I'd say, take a look at the FBI Uniform Crime Reports and you'll see why - any law enforcement in New York will have the same "racist" result.
     
    Last edited: Oct 11, 2012
  12. Bren

    Bren NRA Life Member

    43,505
    11,095
    Jan 16, 2005
    Kentucky
    Even you have to realize it doesn't mean that at all. It means 7 out of 8 people stopped don't have evidence on them that warrants an arrest at that time - that doesn't mean they haven't committed a crime or aren't in the process.

    Think about Mr. Terry in Terry v. Ohio - a whole group of guys were stopped because the police had reasonable suspicion that they were casing a store for a robbery. The majority of them were let go because there was no evidence on them - terry just got arrested because he had a concealed weapon. They were criminals in the process of committing a serious crime, that doesn't mean the Terry stop should result in arrest. It did, however, deter the crime - those evil, unjustified police actually prevented an armed robbery without arresting the robbers, by doing a Terry stop.
     
    Last edited: Oct 11, 2012
  13. G19G20

    G19G20 Status Quo 2014

    2,004
    0
    May 8, 2011
    That's the entire point. (Btw, "the whole group of guys" was a total of 3.)

    The whole argument on these stop and frisks in this thread is that stop and frisks generally are NOT lawful Terry Stops, unlike the original Terry case where a particular behavior was observed that led a cop to reasonably believe a crime was in commission or about to be committed and was likely correct. Terry stops are legal when particular facts can be alleged that point to possible criminal activity. Terry stops require a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity and the original case fulfilled that. Stop and frisks going on in NYC, at the rate of 1800 PER DAY, are not Terry stops. This is why the success rate is so poor. Did you see that video I posted a few posts above? What they're engaging in is profiling and harrassment. I don't doubt that a stop and frisk may occasionally deter a crime. The question is whether it is constitutional to stop people that are doing nothing articulable other than "wrong place at the wrong time". Surely you're not suggesting that the 7 of 8 were about to commit a crime and just got lucky.
     
    Last edited: Oct 11, 2012
  14. Bren

    Bren NRA Life Member

    43,505
    11,095
    Jan 16, 2005
    Kentucky
    The article, biased as it is, does give some indication that they are Terry stops. They try to imply that they are random stops, but the evidence and reading up a little from other sources says otherwise. New York's position is that these stops are based on reasonable suspicion. I see no evidence to the contrary and you state none.

    1,800 a day? How many people are in New York? about 40.000 cops without including the overlapping jurisdictions. Does that come out to about 1 on-duty cop in 20 makes 1 Terry stop per day? Maybe less than that? Indianapolis may have a higher rate of Terry stops - so they use raw numbers to make it seem like a lot.
     
  15. G19G20

    G19G20 Status Quo 2014

    2,004
    0
    May 8, 2011
    Cops lie. Surely you know this. Again I ask if you watched the video I posted above? That young man is the typical Stop and Frisk in NYC. I obviously can't argue the evidence of each case and that's foolish since even a blind squirrel gets lucky sometimes (1 in 8 probably!). The 1 in 8 stat tells the story, considering how many times a day this occurs. That's the evidence that it's a bad policy. Again I ask if 7 in 8 are just lucky?

    If I lived in Indianapolis I'd be making a stink at the city council.

    I don't care how big NYC is. This is supposed to be a free country with a Bill of Rights designed to prevent harassment from "the man" and no one should have to worry about being stopped for being a "****in mutt".
     
  16. barbedwiresmile

    barbedwiresmile Unreconstructed

    10,035
    45
    Feb 3, 2008
    Dixie
    Are you serious?
     
  17. Bren

    Bren NRA Life Member

    43,505
    11,095
    Jan 16, 2005
    Kentucky
    I'm sure you'd be making a stink no matter where you lived. The video you posted? Ridiculous.
    You have to be pretending - otherwise you wouldn't be able to figure out how to get on the internet and type things in English.:upeyes: You can't seriously think that audio recording supports you or proves something.
     
    Last edited: Oct 12, 2012
  18. greenman19

    greenman19

    244
    1
    Nov 6, 2008
    central NC
    If this is your starting premise then you will never be satisfied with any reasonable answer. I mean, where can we go from here?
     
  19. AtlantaR6

    AtlantaR6

    299
    0
    Jul 29, 2004
    So you write a formal report every time you do one, and all those people (Including the DA) review each of them, even if you find nothing and let the person go?

    No offense, but I find that very hard to believe. A more believable scenario is you stop and search whoever you want, and only report the ones you charge.
     
  20. Sam Spade

    Sam Spade Staff Member Lifetime Member

    15,171
    2,943
    May 4, 2003
    Oh look! It's up again.

    Proverbs 26:11 seems to be on point.