close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

New project.. What would you do?

Discussion in 'General Firearms Forum' started by frank_drebin, Feb 22, 2012.

  1. frank_drebin

    frank_drebin 1-man flash mob

    4,884
    37
    Jan 15, 2009
    I just picked up a new-in-box, unfired milled Mak-90. It has the circle with 386 on the receiver. I am not sure which direction to go with her. Any ideas? At present I am considering a Polytech buttstock and PG then call it a day...

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  2. bac1023

    bac1023

    102,336
    2,706
    Sep 26, 2004
    PA

  3. frank_drebin

    frank_drebin 1-man flash mob

    4,884
    37
    Jan 15, 2009
    Right now I plan on doing just that. I do have a line on a Polytech buttstock/Pistol Grip combo with the same color as the forearm grip. For $50 I don't think I could go wrong there.
     
  4. Jade Falcon

    Jade Falcon WTF EREN?!

    5,556
    567
    Aug 2, 2004
    Vancouver, WA.
    Whatever you do, get rid of that god-awful thumb-hole buttstock. I've never liked those things; ugly as sin.
     
  5. frank_drebin

    frank_drebin 1-man flash mob

    4,884
    37
    Jan 15, 2009
    Funny thing is, I actually like the feel of this stock over a stock AK. If some countries used them as a standard rifle stock they would be coveted....
     
  6. Jade Falcon

    Jade Falcon WTF EREN?!

    5,556
    567
    Aug 2, 2004
    Vancouver, WA.
    Well bro, if you like it, by all means, keep it. But damn, they sure are ugly, IMO.
     
  7. frank_drebin

    frank_drebin 1-man flash mob

    4,884
    37
    Jan 15, 2009
    I already ordered the polytech stock. We'll see