Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

millet red dot

Discussion in 'Sights, Optics and Lasers' started by sigman69, Oct 30, 2010.

  1. RSki


    Apr 8, 2010
    I've had one for about 3 years now and shot it on everything from a .357 Ruger GP100 down to my Ruger Mark III where it currently resides. It has never given me any problems. Great battery life. Excellant brightness for indoor or outdoor shooting. Good buy in my opinion.
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2010


    Dec 20, 2002
    I had the 1" version on a Mark II, good clear optics, reliable.
  3. thanks as it will be going on a ruger also, I can get them at dealer price, and they are half the price than an ultradot.
  4. spitrhyma


    Dec 29, 2007
    Hi, I noticed you were interested in putting a red dot on a .22 -- Well my only .22 is a miniature revolver that makes my cell phone look huge. However I have tried putting red dot sights on my glock and shotgun...

    There are mainly 2 diff. classes of red dot sights. Garbage... Expensive... I started off with a garbage red dot sight on my 9mm glock. The sight was not mounted on the slide but the frame for minimal recoil/movement. Still it could not handle it. It turns out those "Call of Duty 4" looking red dot sights are all made of the same parts... just diff. brand names... STAY AWAY FROM THOSE! If you want a flat screen red dot... Trijicon and Doctor are here with lifetime warranties that they stand by.

    However the tube shaped red dot makes it easier to find the red dot on the screen.

    When I realized a red dot sight failed to hold zero on a 9mm I was already over it and wanted iron sights. I decided to buy a red dot for my shot gun (I shoot slugs only) -- so I read all the reviews on and and determined that the Millet was the only affordable red dot that can hold zero on a shotgun (reportedly) -- I bought it, installed it on my shotgun, and I can use it to shoot clay pigeons with SLUGS!

    The scope I bought was the 30mm tube model.

    I now believe that red dot sights come in 3 classes... garbage and expensive... but then there's also millet!

    The only disadvantage on mine is the edge of the lens is warped so the red dot can appear to be on the lens when it's not supposed to. But that's ONLY the very edge of the lens which causes no problems for me since I use it with a buttstock. Remember tube shaped red-dots are designed to be used with rifles or long guns.

    Keep in mind while millet sights are great...their scope rings suck ass. My original failed so I bought another pair only to find that it has the same damage done to it as mine. I assume a lot people are having problems and returning the product to who is not carefully examining the package and reselling it.

    If you want a tight connection you're going to need to grind the screws to modify them so they can be opened with a flat head screwdriver that you trust. The tool they send you is made of cheap soft metal that warps quite easily along with the screws.

    This is a minor downfall if you already have a rotary tool at home and can modify it a couple seconds.

    Good luck

    Oh one more thing mine was a diff. model:

    the good thing is when you change the intensity of the red-dot you virtually change the MOA
  5. Aceman


    Nov 30, 2008
    I can't imagine it would be anything but great. Read the midway reviews.

    And spitrhyma - there ARE dots less expensive than eotech/trijicon etc...that work. Sorry you didn't find one.
  6. spitrhyma


    Dec 29, 2007
    Aceman, I can't imagine what was going through your head when this happened. You are in short an idiot. 90% of my point and the conclusion was saying that same thing you're saying in disagreement... That millet is cheaper and just about equally good.

    If you must have a flat one, You're going to pay at least $200 for a good one.
    Last edited: Sep 30, 2012