close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

MD AWB, its more restrictive than clintons

Discussion in 'Maryland/D. C. Glockers' started by phx223, Feb 14, 2010.

  1. phx223

    phx223

    134
    0
    Apr 25, 2009
    There is a bill that if passed will no longer allow the sale or transfer of any firearm with a detachable magazine and a single "scary feature" (ie tele-stock, pistol grip, flashhider, even thumbhole stocks are considered scary).
    http://mlis.state.md.us/2010rs/billfile/SB0516.htm

    I am a little more moderate about gun laws than most people on GT would like, but for those of you who are against any infringement, heres a heads up. (not saying I am for SB0516, but I am not against all of it)
     
  2. gclefton

    gclefton Gold Member

    108
    0
    Oct 19, 2008
    Western Maryland
    Today from NRA-ILA:
    "
    <table class="MsoNormalTable" style="width: 100%;" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"><tbody><tr style=""><td style="padding: 0in;">
    Senate Bill 516- "Assault Weapons" Ban WITHDRAWN by Sponsor<o:p></o:p>
    </td> </tr> <tr style=""> <td style="padding: 0in;">
    </td> </tr> <tr style=""> <td style="padding: 0in;">
    </td></tr><tr style=""><td style="padding: 0in;">
    </td> </tr> <tr style=""> <td style="padding: 0in;"> [FONT=&quot]Thanks to the massive opposition and outcry against this extreme anti-gun bill, the sponsor has elected to withdraw the legislation. Senate Bill 516 would have prohibited the possession, transfer or receipt of these firearms by law-abiding Maryland residents. <o:p></o:p>[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]<o:p> </o:p>[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]Specifically this bill would have. <o:p></o:p>[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]<o:p> </o:p>[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]- Prohibited most semi-automatic pistols. The bill defines any semi-automatic pistol as an "assault weapon," if it can be fitted with a threaded barrel. Virtually all modern semi-automatic pistols 9mm and above use barrels that are readily removable and replaceable, of course.<o:p></o:p>[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]<o:p> </o:p>[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]- Prohibited semi-automatic shotguns configured for home protection with a pistol grip and folding stock, regardless of barrel length or magazine capacity.<o:p></o:p>[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]<o:p> </o:p>[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]- Prohibited versions of the AR-15 that are currently legal in California by prohibiting any detachable magazine semi-automatic rifle that could be fitted with a pistol grip. California bans this kind of rifle only if it is fitted with a pistol grip. <o:p></o:p>[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]<o:p> </o:p>[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]- Prohibited anyone who lives outside Maryland from bringing an AR-15, M1A, or other such rifle into the state for lawful purposes, such as a training class or marksmanship competition. <o:p></o:p>[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]<o:p> </o:p>[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]This is a well deserved victory for Maryland's law-abiding gun owners but we still must remain vigilant to the threats posed by a multitude of anti-gun bills still making their way around the Maryland General Assembly."[/FONT]
    </td></tr></tbody></table>
     


  3. MDLibertarian

    MDLibertarian NRA Life Member

    636
    12
    Feb 20, 2007
    Columbia, MD
    The author of the bill should have known better than to submit this nonsense to begin with.