close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

M&P 9L vs M&P 9 Pro

Discussion in 'Smith & Wesson Club' started by TSAX, Feb 26, 2011.


  1. TSAX

    TSAX
    Expand Collapse
    USAF Vet

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    10,162
    7
  2. RH45

    RH45
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 14, 2003
    527
    0
    Location:
    Fond du Lac, WI
    I bought the Pro, and still put in the Apex kit.
     

  3. Linux3

    Linux3
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    1,399
    0
    I have the Pro and it shoots great for me as is.
    One of the other IDPA shooters I know had http://www.bowietacticalconcepts.com/mandpprices.html
    do a trigger job and some other work. He ended up shipping the Pro to Smith to put it all back to stock which of course was NOT under warranty.
    Light strikes and a very flakey trigger was the reason for the return to Smith.
    Is Apex any better?
     
  4. TSAX

    TSAX
    Expand Collapse
    USAF Vet

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    10,162
    7

    The Apex is a fantastic kit but I only have the just sear in the M&P9c.
     
  5. RH45

    RH45
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 14, 2003
    527
    0
    Location:
    Fond du Lac, WI
    I don't think I put 1K through my Pro since I installed the Apex kit, but, I've run Federal, Winchester, and CCI primers through it, and they worked fine. The Apex kit consists of "drop in" parts, so, if you don't like them, just take them back out.

    There were issues with some of the early M&Ps giving light strikes, and broken strikers. S&W has redesigned the strikers.