close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

M&P 9c v. Kahr PM9 trigger pull

Discussion in 'Smith & Wesson Club' started by mitch1, Feb 18, 2010.

  1. mitch1

    mitch1

    8
    0
    Oct 3, 2008
    I am thinking about purchasing a new M&P 9c. I have a Kahr PM9, well known for its long, revolver-like trigger pull. From what I have been reading, the M&P, although striker fired like the Kahr, has a much lighter and shorter trigger. Should I consider getting a MA compliant (10 lbs) spring to make it more like the Kahr? Any thoughts are appreciated.
     
  2. Billet

    Billet

    351
    0
    Mar 17, 2009
    I traded my PM9 for an M&P 9c when the Kahr needed a new slide and barrel after only 400 rounds. The triggers are much different, and I prefer the M&P trigger. Its more like a slightly heavy single-action trigger whereas the Kahr is a long DA pull. Unlike a lot of DA/SA pistols, there isn't too much pre-travel slack in the M&P trigger. There is some creep in it, but mine has smoothened out.

    The PM9 shot reasonably well for such a small pistol, but it can't hang with my fullsize pistols at distances beyond 7 yards. The M&P, on the other hand, has a much longer sight radius, better ergos and, for me, a better trigger. It shoots about as well as anything I've tried at longer distances.

    The Kahr is the clear winner in concealability, mostly because it is noticably thinner. The M&P with the flat baseplate is only slightly taller than the Kahr, and the grip hides about as well as the Kahr. Its the thickness of the M&P that is harder to contend with. Personally, I feel much more "armed" with the M&P because of its much higher capacity and superior accuracy.
     

    Last edited: Feb 18, 2010

  3. Linux3

    Linux3

    1,399
    0
    Dec 31, 2008
    Ah Mitch1 we meet again.
    See my comments on the Kahr forum.
     
  4. Palmguy

    Palmguy Boom.

    2,031
    3
    Oct 29, 2006
    NW FL
    Out of the box I prefer the Kahr trigger pull. That said, I just sold my Kahr (CW9, same trigger as the P/PM though) and it is being replaced with an M&P9c.

    I'd look into the Apex sear for the M&P...
     
  5. FiremanMike

    FiremanMike Way too busy

    3,900
    378
    Jul 26, 2007
    The interwebs
    In fairness, the PM9 isn't really designed for long distance target shooting.
     
  6. Billet

    Billet

    351
    0
    Mar 17, 2009
    I guess you missed my point. The M&P 9c isn't much harder to conceal than the PM9, but it shoots as well as a full-size pistol at longer distances. Neither pistol is designed for long distance target shooting, but one is more effective at mall concourse, grocery aisle and parking lot distances.
     
  7. FiremanMike

    FiremanMike Way too busy

    3,900
    378
    Jul 26, 2007
    The interwebs
    This is the second time this week that I've heard a statement like this, the last one said "there's not much difference between a PM9 and a G27".. Boggles my mind, the PM9 is only slightly larger than an LCP/P3AT, I can't understand how people can have that opinion <shrug>