close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

M&P 9c v. Kahr PM9 trigger pull

Discussion in 'Smith & Wesson Club' started by mitch1, Feb 18, 2010.


  1. mitch1

    mitch1
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2008
    8
    0
    I am thinking about purchasing a new M&P 9c. I have a Kahr PM9, well known for its long, revolver-like trigger pull. From what I have been reading, the M&P, although striker fired like the Kahr, has a much lighter and shorter trigger. Should I consider getting a MA compliant (10 lbs) spring to make it more like the Kahr? Any thoughts are appreciated.
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
  2. Billet

    Billet
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    351
    0
    I traded my PM9 for an M&P 9c when the Kahr needed a new slide and barrel after only 400 rounds. The triggers are much different, and I prefer the M&P trigger. Its more like a slightly heavy single-action trigger whereas the Kahr is a long DA pull. Unlike a lot of DA/SA pistols, there isn't too much pre-travel slack in the M&P trigger. There is some creep in it, but mine has smoothened out.

    The PM9 shot reasonably well for such a small pistol, but it can't hang with my fullsize pistols at distances beyond 7 yards. The M&P, on the other hand, has a much longer sight radius, better ergos and, for me, a better trigger. It shoots about as well as anything I've tried at longer distances.

    The Kahr is the clear winner in concealability, mostly because it is noticably thinner. The M&P with the flat baseplate is only slightly taller than the Kahr, and the grip hides about as well as the Kahr. Its the thickness of the M&P that is harder to contend with. Personally, I feel much more "armed" with the M&P because of its much higher capacity and superior accuracy.
     

    #2 Billet, Feb 18, 2010
    Last edited: Feb 18, 2010
  3. Linux3

    Linux3
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    1,399
    0
    Ah Mitch1 we meet again.
    See my comments on the Kahr forum.
     
  4. Palmguy

    Palmguy
    Expand Collapse
    Boom.

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2006
    2,031
    3
    Location:
    NW FL
    Out of the box I prefer the Kahr trigger pull. That said, I just sold my Kahr (CW9, same trigger as the P/PM though) and it is being replaced with an M&P9c.

    I'd look into the Apex sear for the M&P...
     
  5. FiremanMike

    FiremanMike
    Expand Collapse
    Way too busy

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2007
    3,851
    324
    Location:
    The interwebs
    In fairness, the PM9 isn't really designed for long distance target shooting.
     
  6. Billet

    Billet
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    351
    0
    I guess you missed my point. The M&P 9c isn't much harder to conceal than the PM9, but it shoots as well as a full-size pistol at longer distances. Neither pistol is designed for long distance target shooting, but one is more effective at mall concourse, grocery aisle and parking lot distances.
     
  7. FiremanMike

    FiremanMike
    Expand Collapse
    Way too busy

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2007
    3,851
    324
    Location:
    The interwebs
    This is the second time this week that I've heard a statement like this, the last one said "there's not much difference between a PM9 and a G27".. Boggles my mind, the PM9 is only slightly larger than an LCP/P3AT, I can't understand how people can have that opinion <shrug>