close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Levin: Roberts' Decision Does Not Gut Commerce Clause

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by evlbruce, Jun 29, 2012.


  1. evlbruce

    evlbruce
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2003
    5,305
    0
    Full Story

    Not only did Roberts shuffle ObamaCare away into the General Welfare Clause, he let the Commerce Clause stand.
     
    #1 evlbruce, Jun 29, 2012
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2012
  2. CitizenOfDreams

    CitizenOfDreams
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    8,111
    4
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    No, you don't understand! Justice Roberts is playing chess! (While Obama is swinging a baseball bat.)
     

  3. G29Reload

    G29Reload
    Expand Collapse
    Tread Lightly

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2009
    13,286
    358
    You're screwing up the explanation.

    There is no "letting the commerce clause stand".

    It is what it is.

    The fairy tale Levin was shooting down was that which you are hearing on the MSM about Roberts roping off the Commerce Clause from being abused by expanding what it allowed the Gov to do.

    The problem is, it was just Roberts speaking in the dicta. He was not joined or concurred with in that section of the opinion by 4 other justices. As a result, there is no precedent to protect the Commerce Clause from future abuse

    I'm sure it could be referred to, it may have some relevance. But it could easily be ignored.
     
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
This does not look good Carry Issues Feb 25, 2013
Another interesting take on Roberts' decision. Political Issues Jun 29, 2012
Did Chief Justice Roberts change his vote? Perhaps not. Political Issues Jun 29, 2012
If the Commerce Clause sinks, what would you like to see go first? Political Issues Jun 20, 2012
Roberts Hunting, Fishing & Camping Jan 10, 2007
Duty Gear at CopsPlus