lets talk about the Confederate flag.

Discussion in 'The Furball Forum' started by speedsix, May 6, 2010.

  1. "Slavery wasn't evil until the north used it as an excuse to attack the south". If you think owning another human being is not evil, than I don't see how we can have an educated discussion on anything. The Civil war was not fought by the North over slavery, but to preserve the union. The south seceded solely to preserve the institution of slavery. they did not have to secede to preserve slavery, they seceded because they were unable to expand slavery to insure the poreservation of the rich plantation owner's lifestyle. John Breckinridge was in put in the presidential race solely to act as a spoiler to insure Lincoln's victory and to give the southern fireeaters the excuse to secede when Limcoln won.

    As you seem to think slavery was ok, I will admit that you and I are unable to intelligently discuss any subject, and will end my debate with you now.

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
  2. Bren

    Bren NRA Life Member

    That's your "intelligent response?" "If you don't agreee with me, you are stupid and tyour opinion has no merit?" Obviously, there was a time when slavery was not considered evil, and any intelligent, educated person is aware of that. The fact that the opinion doesn't agree with fairly recent modern morality, even though it was fine for about 99.XXX% of human history, does not translate into, "you are too stupid to make an argument." If anything, I'd say one can't have an intelligent discussion with a person who has no more historical perspective, in a historical discussion, than you have demonstrated.

    #222 Bren, Jun 14, 2011
    Last edited: Jun 14, 2011
  3. Dragoon44

    Dragoon44 Unfair Facist
    Lifetime Member

    Not true, at most the US constitution "ignored" slavery, the Founding Fathers knew that slavery was incompatibly with the constitution so they pretended it did not exist as far as the constitution goes. The rebel leaders were also aware of this fact that is why they wrote their own constitution "correcting" the problems with the U.S. Constitution.

    The vice president of the Confederate states, Alexander Stephens made this perfectly clear in his "Cornerstone" speech. In it he enumerated the differences between the U.S. Constitution and the Confederate one.

    Is that so? so even though there were no laws legitimizing slavery it was ok because in YOUR opinion, someone can be deprived of their liberty WITHOUT due process under the US constitution.

    I reject your position, and so did many of the confederate leaders .

    And here was the BIG problem for slave owners, Article 4, section2 clause three states,

    "No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due."

    lacking any laws legitimizing slavery they could not establish that the "fugitive slave" was "held to service" under the laws of their state. Northern states blocked them by requiring jury trials to establish the legitimacy of the southern slave owners claims to their "Property". They lost because the southern slave owners could not establish that the fugitive "slave" was held to service under the laws of their state.
  4. Dragoon44

    Dragoon44 Unfair Facist
    Lifetime Member

    A lot of southern apologist promote the myth that the South wanted to secede peacefully. the Historical record shows otherwise.

    Lincoln was not elected on a platform of abolishing slavery where it already existed. He made it clear he would not interfere with Slavery where it was already established. He vowed however that he would fight to prevent the expansion of slavery into new territories and new States.

    This was what the South would not tolerate and why they seceded even before he took office. The Confederate states were not interested in the protection of slavery where it already existed they demanded that it be allowed to expand into new territories and new states.

    When the rebel States began seceding the sitting president Buchanan. told them that Federal Forts would remain Federal forts. The rebel states seized them anyway. ( with the exception of a few like Fort Sumter.) Buchanan took no action, and neither did Lincoln once he was inaugurated. Lincoln sought to resupply Fort Sumter and even notified the Governor of the state that he was sending unarmed union supply ships to resupply the Fort. Confederate fired on the unarmed supply ships and drove them off.

    The seizure of Union Forts and firing on Fort Sumter are nothing less than acts of war.

    The Confederate states understood there was going to be no peaceful co existence with the US, they clearly stated their intent to take territories and establish new confederate states. War was inevitable.

    Lincoln Proposed a constitutional amendment protecting slavery where it already existed, The south was not interested, they demanded they be allowed to expand slavery.

    In 1862 Lincoln put forth 3 proposed constitutional amendments.

    Again the South was not interested.

    The South was happy to be part of the Union as long as the 3/5ths compromise allowed them to dominate the Govt. When the South dominated they were the best friends of centralized Federal power, ramming legislation through infringing on the rights of other states. And blocking Northern legislation they did not like.

    Once massive immigration into the North began and new states were formed and the south saw it's dominance slipping away they became dissatisfied and talk of secession began. And that is why they were not at all receptive to any of Lincolns overtures to peacefully rejoin the Union.
  5. I never said his argument was stupid and had no merit, but if he, or anyone else, is so morally bankrupt that they believe slavery is not inherently evil than I don't see how I can intelligently idscuss the issue with him. As far as a time when slavery was not considered evil, I think you will find many our Founding Fathers uncomfortable, at best, and downright hostile, at worst, to the institution. Of course, I, as one who has no historical perspective, obviously cannot make that statement, despite having read extensively on the subject. If you, Gray Rider, or anyone else is so mired in the myth of the movie Gone With The Wind, revel in it. The events leading to the war were set in motion by a few rich Southern plantation owners, and the rest of the population was duped into going along with them. Had the South not seceded, the institution of slavery would have been untouched, but it would not have been allowed to expand. And there lay the problem. Without the expansion of the Slave States, and with it the guarantee of remaining in power of the planataion owners, their way of life was at risk, and they did not care what they did to tear apart this country, even if it meant the death of hundreds of thousands and the ruination of their way of life. But then again, as one with no historical perspective, I guess it is a foregone conclusion that I cannot make that statement, either.

    Let me ask you this, as I have asked Gray Rider. As the mantra of Southern Revisionists is that the Civil War was fought over State's Rights, can you give me one example of a right that a resident of Mississippi had that a resident of Maine did not? Can you give me a right that a resident of Connecticut had that a resident of Alabama did not have? Gray Rider seems only able to skirt around the subject and give plattitudes to the Old South and condemn the evil Federal government.
  6. Having lived in Alabama all my life, I both understand and subscribe to my region's deep respect and pride in people like Lee, Cleburne, Longstreet, et al. It is not them, or their bravery in the Civil War, that reflects badly on the Confederate battle flag. They and the soldiers that served gallantly under them 150 years ago gave that banner all the glory it still has.

    Instead, it is the dumba**, hate-spewing peckerwoods largely from areas outside the South, but also in it, who have stolen that banner to try to make it a symbol of hate. Unfortunately, in the eyes of the media and a large section of the public, they have succeeded in that. It is them I blame, not the symbol brave Southerners fought under or those brave men themselves.
  8. Dragoon44

    Dragoon44 Unfair Facist
    Lifetime Member

    You mean peckerwoods that spew stuff like,

    Alexander Stephens, Vice president of the confederacy, "Cornerstone" speech 1861

    Texas Articles of secession.
  9. RichardB

    Silver Member

    "....Instead, it is the dumba**, hate-spewing peckerwoods largely from areas outside the South, but also in it,...."

    Puller don't need to worry about the yankees and other outsiders you need to work to clean up the act a bit closer to home.

    2007 Athens Alabama:


    You will have a difficult time changing the photographed history of our south for the 1950's, 60's, and 70's and afterwards.
    #229 RichardB, Jun 15, 2011
    Last edited: Jun 15, 2011
  10. I never said that racism isn't or wasn't a problem in the South. I acknowledged that it was. Instead, the point I was trying to make is that the reason the Confederate flag is NOW so controversial is that for the last 50 or more years it's been taken over by white supremacist groups like the klan and has become, in the public's mind, forever linked with those groups. Those are the peckerwoods I was talking about and they include any klan groups around here. Before those groups co-opted it, it was more of a historical symbol of the Confederacy.
  11. I am not going to read the 10 pages of posts.

    The Confederate Flag today has nothing to do with racism. Some people or groups that are racist may have adopted it, but it is just a flag. I am very proud of the Confederate flag, I actually have 3 Confederate Flag tattoo's, and 1 that is flying in my yard right now. I am very proud of my herritage, and my family that fought and died under that flag.
  12. "I will say, then, that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races -- that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races from living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior and I as much as any other man, am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race."

    .....Abraham Lincoln, September 18, 1858. Debate with Stephen A. Douglas, in the race for Illinois Senator.
  13. Do you have any family members who served in the Armed Forces of the United States of America? If so, do you feel the same pride for those that fought for the freedom of all Americans as you feel for those who fought for the right to deny the freedom of some people and to hold them as property?

    Do you ever fly the flag of the Untied States of America, or have a tattoo of such?
  14. The Northern and Union states certainly had slavery. So they denied the freedom of some people and held them as property. Some Union states still had slavery after the Civil War was over. Funny how the Northern slanted view of history never seems to mention this.

    The Northern/Union states also fought to deny the freedom and independence of the South.
  15. Dragoon44

    Dragoon44 Unfair Facist
    Lifetime Member

    Lincoln like the Founding Fathers certainly did not consider the black man the equal of the White man. Also like many of the Founding Fathers Lincoln considered slavery and evil.

    Herein lies the fundamental differences between Lincoln and the "Peckerwoods" I quoted. Lincoln did not agree that the Black mans inequality with Whites made him subject to slavery, being owned and considered Chattel property.

    Here are some more Lincoln quotes.

  16. Dragoon44

    Dragoon44 Unfair Facist
    Lifetime Member

    How could that be? is not the confederate flag the symbol of the Confederacy?

    What did the Confederacy stand for? Despite the revisionist history put forth by the Neo Confederates today who have swallowed the myth of the "Lost cause" started by the losing confederates right after the war The evidence of what the Confederacy stood for is plainly stated in the confederates own words before and during the war.

    How much more racist can you get than to believe that by virtue of your own race you have the right to enslave someone of another race?
  17. Are you asking this same question about the United States, which had slavery for 90 years including after all the Confederate slaves were free?
  18. Dragoon44

    Dragoon44 Unfair Facist
    Lifetime Member

    I am talking about how the US constitution did not promote or defend slavery, nor make it the cornerstone of the US Govt.

    The Confederate Constitution did all of the above.

    Keep ducking and dodging like the good little neo confederate you are.
  19. The US Supreme Court sure did defend the right to own slaves with the Dred Scott v. Sandford ruling. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandford

    And the US Congress passed the Fugitive Slave Act that stated runaway slaves had to be returned to their masters http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugitive_Slave_Act_of_1850.

    Of course this was before there ever was a Confederacy.

    Stating facts should not be confused with ducking and dodging.
    #239 Natty, Jun 16, 2011
    Last edited: Jun 16, 2011
  20. Dragoon44

    Dragoon44 Unfair Facist
    Lifetime Member

    Dredd Scot still stands as one of the worst rulings ever made by the SCOTUS, And still today stands as a prime example of an activist court overreaching itself to further it's own agenda.

    The Dissenting judges issued scathing and accurate dissent concerning the majority opinion. Detailing how the ruling flew in the face of established case law from state supreme courts and the Constitution itself. And last but not least how once the court declared Scott had not standing to bring the suit and it therefore had no jurisdiction, the court was obligated to simply dismiss the case and it was improper of the court to issue ANY rulings on the merits of the case after that.

    The "fugitive slave act"

    in which the word slave does not even appear. and whose wording was such that any state requiring the "slave" owner to prove that the "slave" was indeed his property "under the laws thereof" of their state prevented slave owners from taking escaped slaves back to their own states.

    For the simple reason that no slave owner could establish that they owned the slave "Under the law thereof" of their states. since no state had legalized slavery and pro slavery leaders admitted public ally that not only did no slave holding states have laws legalizing slavery but such laws could not be passed under the US constitution or the constitutions of the states that all had Declaration of independence, and BOR style clauses written into their constitutions.

    Even the abolitionists pointed out the illegality of slavery.

    That was the driving force behind secession, the south's realization that their "peculiar institution" had no legal standing, even within their own states. This was why they were determined to secede and create their own constitution that legalized and protected slavery at the national level and forbid any of their member states to do away with it even in their own state.

    It is also why the Confederates detested the Declaration of Independence.

Similar Threads Forum Date
Lets talk ADCOR BEAR Black Rifle Forum May 10, 2015
Lets talk ethics / morality ..... Religious Issues Nov 2, 2014
Lets talk about the Kurds... The Okie Corral Aug 10, 2014
Talk to me about plated bullets.. Reloading Jul 29, 2014
Lets talk Tourniquets Cop Talk Dec 30, 2013

Share This Page

Duty Gear at CopsPlus