Legal consequences of using 10mm in self defense and injuring innocent

Discussion in 'The 10 Ring' started by vandros, Mar 12, 2013.


  1. vandros

    vandros 10mm fan

    164
    0
    Hi my 10mm comrades!

    I've had an interesting exchange w. Mas Ayoob on this issue here. I think his insights might be valuable to many of you on this issue.

    Here's my question:

    and here's his reply:

    What do y'all think? Let's hear it.
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
    #1 vandros, Mar 12, 2013
    Last edited: Mar 12, 2013
  2. Loading...

    Similar Threads Forum Date
    Legal consequences of using 10mm in self defense and injuring innocent GATE Self-Defense Forum Mar 12, 2013
    Legal and Political Consequences of Your HD Battery...Your Thoughts?? General Firearms Forum Feb 26, 2012
    Public defense legal consequences? GATE Self-Defense Forum Jul 18, 2010
    Another released illegal alien commits murder Political Issues Wednesday at 5:25 PM
    `Suspected Illegal Immigrants Run to Shore in Middle of Model's Photo Shoot` The Okie Corral Tuesday at 4:33 PM

  3. Should not be different than any other caliber. If we choose to carry we need to be resposible if we ever have to use it. Practice and know what your carry round is capable of.
     

  4. As usual at the range and in life, Ayoob is right on target.

    Personally, when I carry 10mm for self defense, I use hollow points that are "FBI weak" loadings. Privi Partisan makes them and they are dirt cheap for 10mm. They push 180 grain hollow point around 1000 FPS, so its a hair under 500FPE. it isn't much different from a hot .40 or 9mm round, its a hollow point, so less chance of over penetration, and its cheap ammo, so I have an opportunity to practice with it a lot.

    Lets be honest, if you use a 230 grain hard cast lead 10mm from underwood capable of taking down a cape buffalo, the jury is gonna wonder why that is your home defense load when so many other things are on the market. The key to a self defense scenario under the law is reasonableness. If you can tell a jury that you purposely bought weak loads, I think your chances of showing the self-defense is/was reasonable is better than with big game hunting loads in the gun.
     
  5. vandros

    vandros 10mm fan

    164
    0
    I agree. Anytime you can show how you took specific steps to err on the side of safety, jury will perceive you as responsible and reasonable.
     
  6. It's either a good shoot or it's not. In a good shooting, you won't be questioned on your caliber or bullet type.

    If you're shooting is questionable, expect trouble in Criminal and Civil Court.

    Avoid being trigger happy is my advice. :supergrin:
     
  7. s0nspark

    s0nspark Talk is cheap!

    713
    0
    You may want to rethink that choice - PPU JHPs are cheap for a reason... they do not expand ;-)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=5PdOyZiWThU

    You might be better served using something like Underwood's 155gr or 165gr Bonded Defense.
     
    #6 s0nspark, Mar 13, 2013
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2013
  8. PhotoFeller

    Silver Member

    4,145
    110
    What are the penetration facts for 10mm HP defensive loads? I know it varies, as tarheel explains, but would one be concerned about the bullet passing through the perp and hitting someone else?
     
  9. s0nspark

    s0nspark Talk is cheap!

    713
    0
    I am not aware of a consolidated resource for this (that would be NICE) but the concern that 10mm overpenetrates is blown out of proportion IMO. Sure, if you use ammo designed for hunting you'll have a problem... as would be expected!

    For that reason I tend to stick with the "faster and lighter" approach (as posted above) when choosing SD ammo for my 10mm. The gel tests I've seen suggest that penetration is on par with other calibers... you just get more "punch" out of the 10mm ;-)

    That said, there are a couple of things to keep in mind.

    One, overpenetration is a lesser concern than missing entirely or hitting the target in an extremity.

    Two, it might seem safer to err on the side of caution and choose ammo that penetrates less but that can greatly reduce effectiveness in a SD scenario. Note the last paragraph here: handgun stopping power

    As Mr. Ayoob said, it comes down to making informed choices with what you carry and being responsible should you ever need to use it.
     
    #8 s0nspark, Mar 13, 2013
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2013
  10. I, too, stick with lighter or mid-weight loads for the 10mm. I prefer the 155 or 165gr Gold Dots. They offer more penetration than the really light loads and don't fragment. Lastly, they don't overpenetrate like the heavier 180gr+ loads.

    If I owned and carried a 40SW, I would probably stick with 155 or 165gr loads too.
     
  11. vandros

    vandros 10mm fan

    164
    0
    When you shoot/kill BG in self defense, and your shooting was justifiable (from your point of view), you will likely still be entering our imperfect legal system. Once there, you are at the mercy of the prosecutors and jurors (who are not necessarily your friends). And you'll have to convince these folks (some of whom know nothing about guns) that you are a reasonable and responsible gun owner who acted in self defense and used appropriate force - as any reasonable person would given your circumstances.

    If the BG, or somebody on his behalf, claims shooting was not justified, hires an attorney, and takes you to court, then your situation has just gotten 10 times more complicated and your explanations and arguments should be even better.

    In both (but especially second scenario) all factors, including what weapon and ammunition you used, will be carefully examined. And anything that can be used against you, will be used against you.

    Using gun in self-defense is far more tricky than simply being a good shot.
     
    #10 vandros, Mar 13, 2013
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2013
  12. PhotoFeller

    Silver Member

    4,145
    110
    Hey, vandros, I'm wondering how you came to choose 10mm in the first place. I've been curious about 10mm because its a powerhouse, but it is one of those 'edge of the envelope' things to me. Do you hand load?
     
  13. s0nspark

    s0nspark Talk is cheap!

    713
    0
    One thing Mr. Ayoob has stressed is that you must be able to articulate why you acted as you did... and your defense team must be prepared to counter likely attacks on the choices you made (ammo, etc.)
     
    #12 s0nspark, Mar 13, 2013
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2013
  14. vandros

    vandros 10mm fan

    164
    0
    Photo, I like to hike (and we have mountain lions and black bears around) and I don't like to have many guns... :) So, I currently only have g29 which is great for sd/hd/ccw/hiking. I don't handload - I prefer to purchase ammo either from underwood or doubletap. That's a bit pricey, but I think reliability is worth it. I never shot underpowered 10mm and prefer hot loads, so I don't think I'll be using powered-down 10mm even when not hiking. Although, as several pointed out, that's an option.

    I think 10mm is not that big of a powerhouse. It's got definately more energy than 9mm, 40s&w, or 45acp. But, not as much as to break a wrist or stop a grizzly. It's a decent caliber, imho. But, if I wasn't hiking, I'd be using 9mm g19.

    P.S. Isn't it nice to discuss something noncontroversial for a change? :)
     
    #13 vandros, Mar 13, 2013
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2013
  15. A I know this would be a rare occurrence because the odds of getting so many ignorant people together again is low, but few years ago a teacher here in AZ clearly defended himself with a 10mm, but the jury convicted him anyway and when they interviewed one for jurors they said "he must have been out to kill somebody carrying such a powerful gun".
    Though it took the state of AZ to pass a law (another reason why we have the best gun laws in the US) to get him out of jail, the ignorance of the jury member just floors me every time I think of it.
    The moral is you have no idea what jury member will think but I would carry one if I had one.
     
    #14 AZson, Mar 13, 2013
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2013
  16. vandros

    vandros 10mm fan

    164
    0
    Many jurors are ignorant, anti-gun, and yet very persuasive to their other juror peers. And your life depends on them... Unfortunately, as unfair as this is, this is the reality of our legal system.
     
    1. All guns are always loaded!
    2. Never let the muzzle cover anything you are not willing to destroy!
    3. Keep your finger off the trigger until you are sure of your target!
    4. Always be sure of your target!
    If you are shooting someone in self defense and you miss and hit someone else by mistake, I think there is a very high likelihood that you are violating all of Jeff Cooper's rules except Number 1.


    In the hypothetical situation you describe, it wouldn't matter if you were shooting a Daisy Air Rifle, or a bazooka. If you shoot at someone and someone else is near enough to the bad guy that when you miss, you hit the innocent person instead, you very likely made a terrible decision to shoot in the first place, and very probably would subject yourself to both criminal and civil liability.
     
  17. s0nspark

    s0nspark Talk is cheap!

    713
    0
    That is the case Mr. Ayoob was referring to in the initial post. It clearly points to a failing with his defense team and their approach to the case.

    As wacky as our legal system is, be glad we aren't in the UK where the victims get jailed and the criminals go free! Oh, wait a minute... :-/

    I chose 10mm as my defensive caliber because it is IMO the only caliber suited to all of the places I go (with the appropriate loading, of course.) I want the same carry gun wherever I am (the hood or the woods) instead of having to switch guns and possibly my method of carry. Performance is on par with the .357 magnum (which few would even blink at) but in a platform the provides more capacity and quicker reloads.

    All that is to say, I think it is very important to be able to explain - and defend - your choices.
     
  18. Harold Fish was railroaded by a corrupt court system under an old law which basically required a person to admit to killing a person and then PROVE necessity as an affirmative defense against a homicide charge. The current law shifts proof back on the state where it belongs. Harold Fish would have gone to prison no matter what he used.

    A good shoot is a good shoot regardless of the ammunition used and a bad shoot is a bad shoot, regardless of the ammunition. If you act rationally and within the limits of the law, it is very unlikely that you will see an indictment unless you live in a really crazy leftist county. Your ammunition choice is unlikely to even be known by the DA before they decide to either cut you loose or pursue an indictment. At trial, if there is one, the issue in question is going to be whether your ACTIONS were justified or not. A prosecutor can say all manner of retarded crap but it will only make him look bad if your own attorney has the sense God gave a fence post.

    You should be less worried about what a jury is going to think than about how to avoid finding yourself in front of a jury. More important than that, even, is to be concerned with surviving long enough to worry about what a jury might think. Better to be judged by twelve than carried by six, etc. First get the right tools and training to survive a lethal threat and use the absolute best tools that you can afford and are legal for you to carry. Conduct yourself in a manner that reduces your likelihood of needing to use force. Use as much force as you are legally allowed to use as early as you are allowed to use it if you find it necessary. Act within the limits of the law. If you do those things, it's unlikely you'll find yourself in front of a jury but if you do, you are even more unlikely to be convicted.

    Or you can buy all the internet and gun rag BS and find something that Gramma Nelso won't find scary. Good luck with that. Your hypothetical overzealous prosecutor is just going to point your Colt bodyguard right at her face.

    Massad Ayoob is a pompous blowhard who gets paid to be a pompous blowhard. He writes articles with all sorts of goofy stuff but the central theme seems to be an attempt to scare you into using the absolute least effective tools you have at your disposal. I'm grateful for his work with gun rights but I'm sick of hearing his fanciful crap.

    For the record, that PPU stuff is weaker than .40 S&W and chronographed at less than 880 fps out of my EAA Witness 4.5" barrel. They failed to expand. Beau coups penetration.

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PdOyZiWThU"]Gel test: 10mm 180 gr Prvi Partizan JHP - YouTube[/ame]
     
    #18 Andrew Wiggin, Mar 13, 2013
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2013
  19. vandros

    vandros 10mm fan

    164
    0
    So, was there anything that Massad Ayoob said specifically in this particular situation that you disagree with? Or do you generally dislike/disagree with him?
     
    #19 vandros, Mar 13, 2013
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2013
  20. There is a lot of misinformation and misunderstanding out there about the 10mm, its like an old urban legend that refuses to die.
    The 10mm is often touted as being equal in power to the .41 magnum but the facts tell a different story. If you take a look at the real world ballistics of the 10mm (comparing similar top end loads) it is virtually indistinguishable from the .357mag and .45acp.

    From Corbon's website.

    .45acp 200gr. - 1050 velocity / 490 energy
    10mm 200gr. - 1125 velocity / 562 energy
    .357mag 200gr. - 1150 velocity / 587 energy
    .41mag 210gr. - 1350 velocity / 850 energy

    As you can see the 10mm is not a "power house, fire breathing, giant killer" of a cartridge. In fact it compares favorably with several very popular SD cartridges in common usage.
     

Share This Page

Duty Gear at CopsPlus