close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Kahr p380 vs S&W Bodyguard

Discussion in 'General Firearms Forum' started by Bilbo Bagins, Jul 4, 2012.


  1. Bilbo Bagins

    Bilbo Bagins
    Expand Collapse
    Slacked jawed

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    11,211
    1
    Anyone own either the Kahr P380 or the S&W Bodyguard, or both. Out of these two .380 pocket guns which would you recommend?
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
  2. greenman19

    greenman19
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2008
    244
    1
    Location:
    central NC
    I carry the Kahr every day and like it. It has real sights but mine shoots low if you line them up. The trigger has a smooth (albeit long) pull, like a revolver.

    I have shot the S&W and it is more accurate than it has a right to be, with or without the laser. The drawback on the S&W is the trigger it is god awful hard and gets worse at the end of the stroke. A lighter main spring may solve the problem though.

    Either would be a good choice.
     

  3. Metal Angel

    Metal Angel
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2010
    811
    3
    I have only shot the Khar, but it is wonderfully accurate and easy to be accurate with.
     
  4. Dexters

    Dexters
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    4,191
    1
    Location:
    ga

    Search for BG 380 Vs Sig P238 on the forums also. Someone just did a comparison - it is a difficult decision.
     
  5. neilsmth

    neilsmth
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2009
    57
    0
    Location:
    Austin/Ft Davis TEXAS
    Not really. The Sig is twice the gun at twice the price and they handle the same but with a long trigger pull on the BG.
    I have both and on ranges day the BG stays home.
     
  6. eddy t

    eddy t
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2010
    134
    0
    I have both and carry both and have not had a round fail to fire in either gun. 950 rounds through the bg and 450 rounds through the kahr. I bought the bg first.
    The kahr is my preference if you are willing to spend the additional money. Better built all around, are more streamline. laser is not really a plus for me on the bg, don't use it at the range.
    here are the specs for both:
    BG KAHR
    L 5.3 4.9
    H 4.1 3.9
    W .8 .8
    BL 2.8 2.5
    SR 4.2 4.0 (SIGHT RADIUS)
    WT12.3 11.3
    TRG 8 5.3

    PS... I HAVE TALON GRIPS ON BOTH GUNS, REALLY ENHANCES THE GRIP.
     
    #6 eddy t, Jul 4, 2012
    Last edited: Jul 4, 2012
  7. Bilbo Bagins

    Bilbo Bagins
    Expand Collapse
    Slacked jawed

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    11,211
    1
    Funny , I have the Sig P238 and after a month I want to get rid of it. Loaded in a wallet holster that covers the safety its 1 1/2 inches thick and weighs +18 oz loaded. You better off just carrying a PM9 or a Beretta Nano :upeyes: I'm also not that impressed with an 8lb single action trigger, and I was disappointed with the so called Sig quality for a +$600 gun, with only 1 mag and the finish rubbing off the barrel after the first 50 rounds.

    Its a pretty looking gun, its fun to shoot, and its reliable, but its not a great pocket gun.
     
  8. Dexters

    Dexters
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    4,191
    1
    Location:
    ga

    Not really, The BG is a DAO and the Sig's action is similar to the 1911.

    As to price - there is only $150 difference in my area.
     
  9. Berto

    Berto
    Expand Collapse
    woo woo

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2003
    24,044
    1,925
    Location:
    WA
    I like my BG 380, but it took a little work to get it right.
     
  10. Nakanokalronin

    Nakanokalronin
    Expand Collapse
    JMB & MTK

    Joined:
    May 13, 2008
    3,881
    46
  11. Bilbo Bagins

    Bilbo Bagins
    Expand Collapse
    Slacked jawed

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    11,211
    1
    Thanks, that is an awesome review. Like you mentioned the Sig was suprisingly heavy for a .380 pocket gun. Don't get me wrong, I like shooting it, but carrying it in the pocket just stinks for me. I tried carrying it around unloaded and its better, so the weight of a Sig 238 unloaded is about the weight of a S&W bodyguard loaded. The Kahr P380 is a little over an ounce lighter than the S&W bodyguard, but I wonder if having a nicer Kahr trigger and shaving an extra ounce is worth the extra +$150 or so in cost.

    I was critical of the Bodyguard in the past, but its been out for a while and I'm hoping all the bugs have been fixed.
     
    #11 Bilbo Bagins, Jul 5, 2012
    Last edited: Jul 5, 2012
  12. Boot Stomper

    Boot Stomper
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2010
    2,981
    145
    Location:
    Metro East of IL
    IMO the Kahr has the better trigger over the Smith & Wesson, Bodyguard. The Bodyguard (my father's) I have shot has been reliable. The Kahr 380 is more expensive in my area. The Kahr design seem to be very reliable design.

    For me, I would take the Kahr over the Bodyguard.
     
  13. Dexters

    Dexters
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    4,191
    1
    Location:
    ga
    check out post #10 in that threat - fully loaded the difference is 2.1 oz.
     
  14. Bilbo Bagins

    Bilbo Bagins
    Expand Collapse
    Slacked jawed

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    11,211
    1
    But when you factor in using a lightweight pocket holster that just covers the trigger vs full sized holster that covers the trigger and manual safety, now your talking 4 to 5 ounces.

    Like I mentioned earlier a loaded Sig P238 in leather holster that covers the safety is as thick and heavy as a loaded Kahr PM9/CM9 in a Desantis Nemesis.

    Why not buy a Bodyguard or Kahr 380, then trade in the Sig and get a Kahr or Beretta pocket 9mm.
     
    #14 Bilbo Bagins, Jul 5, 2012
    Last edited: Jul 5, 2012
  15. Dexters

    Dexters
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    4,191
    1
    Location:
    ga
    I'm with you that every ounce counts.

    I wouldn't go with the new pocket nines. My basic reasoning is that in a stress situation they have two disadvantages then the 380s related to recoil.
    1 - Second shot placement & time back on target
    2 - Second shot - risk of poor grip and/or limp wrist-ing and possible feeding problems

    I think the great grip and isosceles triangle you see on youtube etc. would be difficult in the situations most likely to be encountered.

    I think practicing one hand and other stressed grips is important.
     
  16. popapeach

    popapeach
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2012
    8
    0
    Sorry guys can't agree about the Kahr I red everything I could on 380's and thought the Kahr would work for me. Right out of the box FTF's but I hung in there The gun shop says got to break it in recommend 250-300 rounds it got better but every once in a while another FTF it was a nice shooter then I took a friend out to the range on a 10-15 degree early winter day and that sucker just kept failing, can't trust it went for a G26 gen 4 heavy, a little but reliable , the recoil is even lighter, I love this Gun