close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor's Shocking Ignorance

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by snerd, Mar 31, 2012.

  1. snerd

    snerd

    13,425
    4,014
    Apr 20, 2007
    I thought she was a wise Latino?
     
  2. P35

    P35

    131
    0
    Oct 18, 2006
    Tulsa, Oklahoma
    she was only trying to make her team(team B. H. O. ) look good ..lying liars telling lies
     


  3. Javelin

    Javelin Got Glock? Silver Member

    13,775
    3
    Feb 9, 2008
    N. Dallas
    :agree:

    Her seat is nothing more than a shill.
     
  4. CAcop

    CAcop

    19,947
    2,552
    Jul 21, 2002
    California
    What a tard. Its against the law to turn people away from an ER.
     
  5. aircarver

    aircarver Ride Continues Silver Member

    So What ? .... She's got a job for life ........:upeyes:

    .
     
  6. UtahIrishman

    UtahIrishman BLR Silver Member

    6,891
    1,471
    Nov 11, 2001
    Utah
    My daughter has gone a long time without health insurance (Thankfully she now has a job with insurance). She has had several serious health problems over the years and has never been turned away because of lack of insurance. The hospitals have always either done it gratis or arranged payment plans with her.
     
  7. maxsnafu

    maxsnafu

    2,942
    1
    Dec 29, 2006
    Her ignorance is not shocking. She was not picked for the court because of her brainpower. She is there to fill a quota. Nothing more. Nothing less.
     
  8. snerd

    snerd

    13,425
    4,014
    Apr 20, 2007
    I believe that they actually start believing their own lies, they repeat them so much.
     
  9. Ruble Noon

    Ruble Noon "Cracker"

    11,018
    2
    Feb 18, 2009
    Libtard.
     
  10. coastal4974

    coastal4974

    3,818
    0
    Nov 2, 2009
    She has to be smart, she was the editor of the Yale Law review, just like the little Nazi.

    The economic intelligence runs in party. Kagan thinks DemocratCare is all about the federal gubmint “giving a boat load of money to the states”. She doesn’t understand what all the fuss is about. Free healthcare for all woohoo (idiot)!!
     
  11. Cavalry Doc

    Cavalry Doc MAJ (USA Ret.)

    34,969
    9
    Feb 22, 2005
    Republic of Texas
  12. Kingarthurhk

    Kingarthurhk Isaiah 53:4-9

    8,172
    171
    Sep 5, 2010
    Texas
    Isn't she the "Wise Latino Woman" by self-promotion?
     
  13. certifiedfunds

    certifiedfunds Tewwowist

    52,431
    4,783
    Apr 23, 2008
    Houston
  14. DonGlock26

    DonGlock26

    46,720
    1,775
    Jan 18, 2001
    Wow, what an uninformed, lazy idiot.

    _
     
  15. creaky

    creaky Pamwe Chete

    3,219
    0
    Dec 12, 2007
    The Orion Spur
    100% correct.
     
  16. engineer151515

    engineer151515

    14,165
    240
    Nov 3, 2003
    The Liberal elite . . . shocking unaware yet dictating like kings and queens over the unwashed masses.


    Yet they must have a feeling of accomplishment that they have 2, certain, insider "plants" for carrying forward Obamacare.

    Is there any possible justification for Justice Kagan not recusing herself from this case from the very start? Any at all???

    The US Supreme Court stands to ruin their credibility to the levels of the Nobel committee, if they haven't already.
     
  17. Paul7

    Paul7 New Guy

    15,275
    1,579
    Dec 16, 2004
    East of Eden
    Doesn't bother the left, as long as she votes the party line. She shouldn't even be allowed to be on this case. Yet according to some here, it doesn't matter whether you vote for Obama or Romney.
     
    Last edited: Apr 1, 2012
  18. evlbruce

    evlbruce

    5,311
    2
    Nov 3, 2003
    Governor Mitt Romney, who touts his conservative credentials to out-of-state Republicans, has passed over GOP lawyers for three-quarters (75%) of the 36 judicial vacancies he has faced, instead tapping registered Democrats or independents – including two gay lawyers who have supported expanded same-sex rights.

    Of the 36 people Romney named to be judges or clerk magistrates, 23 are either registered Democrats or unenrolled voters who have made multiple contributions to Democratic politicians or who voted in Democratic primaries, state and local records show. In all, he has nominated nine registered Republicans, 13 unenrolled voters, and 14 registered Democrats.

    Mathematically speaking, you'd get more Republican judges in the next eight years by re-electing 0 and replacing him with a Republican president who appoints just above half their justices from their own party.
     
  19. maxsnafu

    maxsnafu

    2,942
    1
    Dec 29, 2006
    You're absolutely correct. She could be a drooling cretin. As long as she votes with Ginsburg she's OK as far as the Left is concerned.