close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

Judiciary Chair Rejects Assault Weapons Ban

Discussion in 'Gun-Control Issues' started by Pete7072, Jan 30, 2013.

  1. Pete7072

    Pete7072

    88
    0
    Aug 23, 2012
  2. SJ 40

    SJ 40

    13,346
    3,034
    Jan 17, 2011
    Vermont
    The rebuffed California Democrat plans to hold her own hearing in her Judiciary subcommittee on her legislation,
    .

    She's going to take her toys and go play by herself. SJ 40
     


  3. WinterWizard

    WinterWizard

    1,417
    5
    Jan 17, 2012
    This is all smoke and mirrors by Obama. Tell Biden to devise some empty executive "directives." Let the hogs run wild by letting Feinstein fail with a new AWB. And in 6 months, when everything has blown over, politically, he can say he did something.

    But anyone with a brain knows that if this AWB passed and actually went into effect, it would cripple a huge industry and irrevocably harm the economy. Why do you think the auto industry was bailed out, and the banks? Because if a large industry goes under, the economy could collapse.

    I would say the president has no intention of letting any gun ban happening, unless he wants to end this country.
     
  4. Stupid

    Stupid

    1,218
    2
    Oct 26, 2005

    The whole civilian firearm industry is a 10 billion in size about what Exxon does in a day. It is tiny and unimportant to the whole economy.
     
  5. SJ 40

    SJ 40

    13,346
    3,034
    Jan 17, 2011
    Vermont
    In my mind that is his ultimate goal. SJ 40
     
  6. WinterWizard

    WinterWizard

    1,417
    5
    Jan 17, 2012
    It would put many companies out of business and probably tens of thousands of people out of work overnight. It you don't think that would hurt an already ailing economy, well, go on back to sleep.
     
    Last edited: Jan 30, 2013
  7. GLJones

    GLJones

    116
    0
    May 16, 2000
    Orlando, Florida
    Don't forget the thousands of gun shops and their employees. Most industries support many more people than just those in that specific industry (gun manufacturers in this case). Remember all the trainers, accessory makers, ranges, and many more. Shutting down guns means tens of thousands of unemployed, maybe 100s of thousands.
     
  8. GunHo198

    GunHo198

    1,120
    0
    Oct 7, 2004
    Tampa
  9. WinterWizard

    WinterWizard

    1,417
    5
    Jan 17, 2012
    Exactly.
     
  10. Maybe not... Walmart will also lose its firearms and ammunition business.



    Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
     
  11. jeanderson

    jeanderson Toga!... Toga! Platinum Member

    I would say that is his goal. Outside of the gun banning issue, I can think of no motives behind his behavior other than to destroy the country.
     
  12. Jerry

    Jerry Staff Member Moderator Millennium Member

    4,116
    1
    Dec 21, 1998
    Louisiana
    What do you think Bari's ultimate goal is? Could it be, get vast numbers dependent on the government? Could it be class warfare? Could it be getting government control over as many corporations as possible? Fascism?

    When people compare him to Hitler they are labeled nut-jobs. Do a little history research on Hitler then compare it to Bari's. Don't believe the nut-jobs research for yourself. :whistling:
     
    Last edited: Jan 31, 2013