close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

Judges Order DOJ to "Clarify" After Obama Health Care Remark

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by Mrs. Tink, Apr 3, 2012.

  1. Mrs. Tink

    Mrs. Tink Semper Fidelis

    4,270
    1
    Mar 1, 2005
    Hmmmm. The judiciary doesn't like being poked, it seems.

    Source
     
  2. G17Jake

    G17Jake

    6,112
    297
    Sep 13, 2002
    Is there a power struggle going on between the federal branches?
     


  3. snerd

    snerd

    12,738
    3,310
    Apr 20, 2007
    Oklahoma
    This ought to be good. Why not ask the agitator directly? Protocol, I guess.
     
  4. aircarver

    aircarver Ride Continues Silver Member

    Always......



    It's not smart to poke judges ........:upeyes:

    .

    .
     
  5. Mrs. Tink

    Mrs. Tink Semper Fidelis

    4,270
    1
    Mar 1, 2005
    They sort of are. "You guys are in charge of legal matters for Obama. So, it falls on you to tell us what he meant. Hop to it." Or, alternatively, "Get a handle on your boss. He's off the rails and we are not amused."
     
  6. G17Jake

    G17Jake

    6,112
    297
    Sep 13, 2002
    Obama is all for activist judges, regardless of how high the court. What Obama doesn't like is adherence to the COTUS.
     
  7. wjv

    wjv

    13,803
    1,228
    Jan 17, 2002
    Pacific NW
    The last thing you want to tell a judge is that he doesn't have any authority to do something. . .

    These guys could start issuing all sorts of Subpoenas. . Like:

    - Let's see that birth certificate again
    - Let's see everything you got on Fast and Furious
    - Let's see all the documents regarding Solyndra
    - let's see everything in the Black Panther voting intimidation case
    - Let's see every WH e-mail that was sent in the past 3 years

    {BLEEP} with judges, and they can {BLEEP} you back 5X harder. . .

    I'd bet that even some of the liberal judges on the Court resented his remarks.

    Looks like Barry is getting a lesson in US Constitutional law. . .
     
    Last edited: Apr 3, 2012
  8. aircarver

    aircarver Ride Continues Silver Member

    :supergrin::supergrin::supergrin::supergrin::supergrin:
     
  9. LASTRESORT20

    LASTRESORT20 LongTerm-Guy

    18,601
    26,316
    Aug 10, 2010
    NC
    +2 :supergrin::supergrin:
     
  10. fortyofforty

    fortyofforty

    9,592
    2,159
    Jul 9, 2005
    We see how successful subpoenas issued by Congress are, don't we? I mean, the White House just ignores them or gives half-assed compliance, deciding what it wants to turn over rather than following the demands of the subpoena. I figure the White House would ignore subpoenas no matter from whence they came.
     
  11. wjv

    wjv

    13,803
    1,228
    Jan 17, 2002
    Pacific NW
    The Federal Circuit is not a court you want to ignore. .
     
  12. G29Reload

    G29Reload Tread Lightly

    13,286
    363
    Sep 28, 2009
    No, just an imbecile running one of them.

    Apparently a former Harvard Law student who never heard of Marbury v. Madison.



    Who has a big surprise or two coming, one in June, and another in November.
     
  13. G17Jake

    G17Jake

    6,112
    297
    Sep 13, 2002
    I don't want him nominating any more candidates for the other.
     
  14. cheapshot

    cheapshot

    434
    12
    Oct 27, 2011
    I sure as hell hope so. If not, this country is done. Period.
     
    Last edited: Apr 3, 2012
  15. fortyofforty

    fortyofforty

    9,592
    2,159
    Jul 9, 2005
    Maybe not, but they don't have a police force that can match the DOJ, I'll wager. Holder's Praetorian Guard would never let him get served directly anyway.
     
  16. Naelbis

    Naelbis

    3,396
    158
    Oct 22, 2009
    ND
    Last I heard Congress can't issue a subpoena directing ANY LEO to take someone into custody and deliver their person before them...courts can. Courts can also issue Contempt warrants and have pretty much anyone thrown in jail until they comply with court orders. And trust me, when push comes to shove your average LEO will side with the court. Heck, Sheriffs and Constables are technically officers of the court as is the USMS.
     
  17. Kfall

    Kfall

    104
    0
    Mar 29, 2009
    I particularly liked the part where the justice department is ordered to provide a 3 page single spaced response by Thursday! Talk about slap down!
     
  18. KentuckyPatriot

    KentuckyPatriot Photojournalist

    395
    16
    Aug 30, 2010
    Kentucky
    Annotated no less...and ordered the attorney to actually include Obama's own words and basically defend or reject them...this is gonna be good!

    Popcorn anyone?? :popcorn: