close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

Jim Cirillo

Discussion in 'Caliber Corner' started by Chuck54, Jul 5, 2012.

  1. Slight Spoilers***




    This is a great book and I have read it twice and keep referring back to it several times each year. Especially the last 7 years on the job when I worked the Surveillance Unit.

    Jim Cirillo liked, very much, the S&W 4546, (p92). This a a 4500 series of Smith's that is double action only. This is one of the things that got my unit using the S&W 4500 series of pistols!

    Cirilo also liked the 41 Magnum on a S&W frame a Dan Wesson barrel and with his own designed and patented wadcutter bullets for it and the 44. He also liked the 44 Magnum with a 4 or 5 inch barrel double action.

    It says in this book that if he were still on the stakeout squad he would use a Glock 21 as his primary gun!! (p116).

    He also has a very good section on shooting handguns.

    Cirillo says several times in this book that the main considerations with a handgun shooting are 1) Construction and configuration of the bullet. 2) Diameter. 3) Velocity. and 4) Weight!!! (p47).

    I think I might read this book again! :supergrin:
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2012
  2. Chuck54

    Chuck54

    620
    0
    Nov 8, 2007
    I get something out of it every time I read it and use it for reference too.
     


  3. PghJim

    PghJim

    1,935
    49
    Apr 21, 2005
    Pittsburgh
    The ammo Jim helped develop was the RBCD Performance Plus and it is still available.

    http://www.rbcd.net/home.cfm
     
  4. agtman

    agtman 10mm Spartiate

    2,337
    87
    Feb 28, 2001
    Midwest
    Actually, in some gun mag articles hyping the RCBD ammo that G26S239 mentioned, he was using the G20 and G29 and shooting their 10mm product. In another gun-rag piece, he was shown CCW-ing a G29 ... :whistling:

    Just FYI ...

    :cool:
     
  5. 10mm...Excellent!
     
  6. PghJim

    PghJim

    1,935
    49
    Apr 21, 2005
    Pittsburgh
    When my testosterone levels rise I carry a G29, now with Underwood 165 gr GD ammo.
     
  7. Sniper1326

    Sniper1326

    1
    1
    Jul 4, 2012
    I met Jim at FLETC in 1986 when he was a firearms instructor for Customs after retiring from NYPD. He autorgraphed my target for me that I still have to this day. We met again in Puerto Rico when I was on special assignment with USMS. He was hired to come down and teach a tactical pistol course. We had dinner/drinks and the stories he told were priceless. Cherished memories from a true hero in my mind... At that time he talked about hand loading a hollow based wadcutter upside down so that the hollow cavity would expand when it struck the bad guy. He was a one of a kind guy...... BTW a wadcutter is a very accurate round... I have seen 3" groups fired a 50 yards with this round. It does not lose accuracy past 25 yds.....ask any old PPC shooter...
     
    canesfan likes this.
  8. vanilla_gorilla

    vanilla_gorilla

    436
    1
    May 31, 2005
    Florida
    Well, yes and no. The wadcutter round, properly loaded, does not destabilize at 25 yards. PPC shooters can use it to 50. However, my experience (and that of many others) is that past 50, they start to go everywhere due to destabilization.

    And a swaged lead hollow-based wadcutter, when loaded backwards and slightly hotter than the normal bullseye load, will pretty much turn a raccoon inside out at 8 yards. :whistling:
     
  9. Tiro Fijo

    Tiro Fijo

    6,281
    7
    May 31, 2011

    I had always heard the same, but there are some who say that WFN bullets CAN be accurate to 100 yds. IF driven fast. I don't know nor will I know as I limit myself to 50 yds. & under with a Ruger SA in the bush using Keith SWC's. If anyone wants to read themselves into a coma on this topic about WFN at long distance then knock yourself out:

    http://castboolits.gunloads.com/archive/index.php/t-141624.html
     
  10. WiskyT

    WiskyT Malcontent

    11,682
    1
    Jun 12, 2002
    North Carolina
    It's a velocity issue. The typical full WC load seems to be right on the edge of stabilization. Some guns are faster than others. So, a fast 4" gun and they shoot fine at 50 yards. I've seen them shoot shotgun patterns at 10 yards out of a snub. The same snub shot a fist sized group at 25 yards with a standard LRN load running 100 fps faster. If you handload the WC's to a higher velocity, they will likely stabilize at longer ranges.

    FWIW, in official PPC competition, the NRA rules prohibit full WC's. They do allow them in Bullseye and they shoot to 50 yards in Bullseye.
     
  11. hunter won

    hunter won

    247
    1
    Nov 13, 2010
    I have heard of one of his stories which he used two Model 10's to dispatch the badguy's. A true badass!
     
  12. SCmasterblaster

    SCmasterblaster Millennium Member

    18,095
    610
    Sep 24, 1999
    Hartford, Vermont
    I met JC in NH long ago at a shooting match. Mas Ayoob brought him.
     
  13. Glockdude1

    Glockdude1 Federal Member CLM

    24,188
    2,565
    May 24, 2000
    Beaumont,Texas
    Nice guy.

    :cool:
     
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2012
  14. SCmasterblaster

    SCmasterblaster Millennium Member

    18,095
    610
    Sep 24, 1999
    Hartford, Vermont
    Both he and Mas were gentlemen.
     
  15. ChiefWPD

    ChiefWPD

    3,398
    485
    Dec 25, 2004
    Jim liked the full-wadcutter configuration because it is the most effective configuration for handgun level rounds when non-frangible projectiles are used.

    Keep in mind that until fairly recently "expanding projectiles" didn't always expand reliably!

    Jim sent me (through the gentleman that made them for him) a bunch of his wadcutter rounds in both .38 Special and .44 Special. Very nicely done but I don't think they are currently available.

    For the record, I carry Buffalo Bore full-wadcutters in my .38 Special J-frame S&Ws. They are hard cast 150 grain rounds that do an honest +900 fps out of the little 2" barrel.
     
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2012
  16. SCmasterblaster

    SCmasterblaster Millennium Member

    18,095
    610
    Sep 24, 1999
    Hartford, Vermont
    Was it JC who experimented with HBWCs loaded backwards?
     
  17. WiskyT

    WiskyT Malcontent

    11,682
    1
    Jun 12, 2002
    North Carolina
    Everybody with a reloading press has tried that. They did it when JC might have tried it, but before anyone other than his co-workers knew who he was.

    JC marketed two loads with wadcutter type bullets that I know of. It was about ten years ago. One was a standard 148 WC at standard pressure, the other was a +P load that had a slot cut in the face of the WC, like a flathead screwdriver slot. They were called "Safestop" and a google search should turn up better info on them. The operation never really got off the ground.
     
  18. G26AZ

    G26AZ

    374
    0
    Aug 16, 2001
    Arizona
    Was he the one that developed (forgive my memory here...) "Pin Grabbers"? They looked like a JHP with a jagged, sawtooth edge around the outside top edge. IIRC, they were originally developed to "bite" in bowling pins during the pin shooting games, but Cirillo opined that they would make good SD rounds because they would not (in theory?) bounce off of a skull.

    Then again, my memory might be decieving me and I could be wrong. There was one time I was wrong, but I was mistaken . . .:supergrin:
     
  19. ChiefWPD

    ChiefWPD

    3,398
    485
    Dec 25, 2004
    In regard reversing a hollow-base wadcutter, this was done for many years. Problem is twofold; first issue is, they tumbled badly (yeah, I tried them too…), and the second issue is, you’re probably better off with the square end of the round going the way it was designed.

    Keep in mind that the British tried this same experiment a hundred years ago with their “Man stopper” series of rounds for the .455 and .476 service rounds. They first put out a double hollowed out (base and nose) round. They then switched to just a hollow base full-wadcutter, finding that round to be no less effective.
     
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2012
  20. SCmasterblaster

    SCmasterblaster Millennium Member

    18,095
    610
    Sep 24, 1999
    Hartford, Vermont
    I don't think so :upeyes: