close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

jesus did not abolish the old covenant (mosiac law)

Discussion in 'Religious Issues' started by Geko45, Oct 26, 2012.


  1. Schabesbert

    Schabesbert
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2001
    5,038
    0
    Location:
    Buffalo, NY, USA
    This was apocryphical language, and in that sense, they have, with the destruction of Jersulem and specifically the Temple.


    The Temple is considered a microcosm in the truest sense, and its destruction represented the end of an age.

    There weren't the requisite two or three witnesses against her anymore.
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
  2. Glock36shooter

    Glock36shooter
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 30, 2010
    3,157
    0
    Oooooo explain that please. I find that ideal fascinating.
     

  3. Glock36shooter

    Glock36shooter
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 30, 2010
    3,157
    0
    I find that most of your apologetics depend greatly on the "The Bible says X but what it really means is Y." And then you claim the interpretation that you have chosen is the only correct one and that everyone else is wrong and simply doesn't understand it as completely as you.

    I feel you twist the bible to mean whatever you want it to mean and back it up with an impressive pile of BS. In your world the bible cannot be held accountable for what it actually says because what it says is completely different from what it actually means. What box of cracker jacks did you get your secret decoder ring out of and where can I get mine?
     
  4. scccdoc

    scccdoc
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2011
    1,394
    1
     
  5. Glock36shooter

    Glock36shooter
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 30, 2010
    3,157
    0
     
  6. Schabesbert

    Schabesbert
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2001
    5,038
    0
    Location:
    Buffalo, NY, USA
    [sarcasm]I have never said that "The Bible says X" nor have I ever said that what it "means is Y." In fact, "X" and "Y" are meaningless.
    [/sarcasm]
    Of course, I understand what you mean, but that is because we're using a common context for the meaning. Another culture, at another time, could simply conclude that you're not telling the truth, or that you're completely wrong. And THAT is what you're doing with the Bible.

    No, we study the scriptures and make a determination based on the intended meaning of the human author.

    Mark P. Shea: Reading the Bible Like a Grownup

    In the real world, feelings don't really stack up well against actual facts.

    Actually, this is exactly upside down. What we try to do is derive the actual meaning as the author intended it.

    I could point you to a huge pile of good books, but you would rather go off of your "feelings" I'm afraid.

    Just as a LITERALISTIC reading of your first paragraph would lead to a misinterpretation of your INTENDED meaning, someone in another culture could (if they didn't WANT to get to the truth, since they couldn't handle the truth) mockingly dismiss your statement as a bunch of, to quote Biden, "malarky."

    You could start off with the Catechism:
    109 In Sacred Scripture, God speaks to man in a human way. To interpret Scripture correctly, the reader must be attentive to what the human authors truly wanted to affirm, and to what God wanted to reveal to us by their words.75

    110 In order to discover the sacred authors' intention, the reader must take into account the conditions of their time and culture, the literary genres in use at that time, and the modes of feeling, speaking and narrating then current. "For the fact is that truth is differently presented and expressed in the various types of historical writing, in prophetical and poetical texts, and in other forms of literary expression."76
     
    #26 Schabesbert, Oct 29, 2012
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2012
  7. Glock36shooter

    Glock36shooter
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 30, 2010
    3,157
    0
    I disagree. I know... since I do not view it your way I am wrong. Nevertheless the Bible has been translated and retranslated to the satisfaction of the world. It's only when it's blatant contradictions, barbaric morality, and archaic mythologies cannot be reconciled with modern day knowledge and wisdom that the so called biblical scholars must begin twisting the meanings of things and reinventing the intentions of the authors. The bible says the world and heavens. If it meant temple... it would say temple. If it meant Jerusalem it would have said so. You are stretching to have it mean what you want it to mean. Or at least the "Scholars" who's every word you hang on are stretching it.

    So long as the meaning agrees with your world view and God hates all the same people you do. Otherwise you'd pick another interpreter that twists it to your liking.


    Of which you have none.


    So long as it agrees with your world view.
     
  8. Schabesbert

    Schabesbert
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2001
    5,038
    0
    Location:
    Buffalo, NY, USA
    Oh, no ... you said so, and since your proclaimation is all that is needed, you MUST be right. :upeyes:

    OK. Since you claimed I said that "the Bible says X" you are either dishonest, or assuming that your non-literalistic interpretation would be understood. If the former, then your claim above is simply a case of "special pleading."

    So, which is it then: are you dishonest, or commiting a logical fallacy?


    Other opinions without any support deleted.
     
    #28 Schabesbert, Oct 29, 2012
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2012
  9. Glock36shooter

    Glock36shooter
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 30, 2010
    3,157
    0
    I agree


    Other opinions without any support deleted.
     
  10. Brasso

    Brasso
    Expand Collapse
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 1998
    5,226
    539
    Location:
    Stranger in a strange land.
    And it never did.

    Lev 17:11 For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul.

    Heb 9:22 And, according to the Torah, almost all is cleansed with blood, and without shedding of blood there is no forgiveness.
     
  11. Vic Hays

    Vic Hays
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2002
    9,215
    73
    Location:
    My home is in heaven
    Just about anything can be supported if you cherry pick and ignore some Bible scriptures that speak to the subject.

    Hebrews 8:13 In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.

    Jesus did not destroy the Old covenant He just made it ineffective and obsolete.

    Hebrews 8:6 But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises.
    Hebrews 8:7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second.

    Since the Old Covenant is flawed and ineffective why cling to it rather than embracing the New Covenant?
     
    #31 Vic Hays, Oct 29, 2012
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2012
  12. Brasso

    Brasso
    Expand Collapse
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 1998
    5,226
    539
    Location:
    Stranger in a strange land.
    Why do you keep posting non-contextual posts?

    No one is clinging to the Mosaic Covenant. I'm stating exactly what the Bible says.

    Jer 31:31 “See, the days are coming,” declares יהוה, “when I shall make a new covenant with the house of Yisra’ĕl and with the house of Yehuḏah1, Footnote: 1See Heb. 8:8-12, Heb. 10:16-17.
    Jer 31:32 not like the covenant I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Mitsrayim, My covenant which they broke, though I was a husband to them,” declares יהוה.
    Jer 31:33 “For this is the covenant I shall make with the house of Yisra’ĕl after those days, declares יהוה: I shall put My Torah in their inward parts, and write it on their hearts. And I shall be their Elohim, and they shall be My people.
    Jer 31:34 “And no longer shall they teach, each one his neighbour, and each one his brother, saying, ‘Know יהוה,’ for they shall all know Me, from the least of them to the greatest of them,” declares יהוה. “For I shall forgive their crookedness, and remember their sin no more.”
    Jer 31:35 Thus said יהוה, who gives the sun for a light by day, and the laws of the moon and the stars for a light by night, who stirs up the sea, and its waves roar – יהוה of hosts is His Name:
    Jer 31:36 “If these laws vanish from before Me,” declares יהוה, “then the seed of Yisra’ĕl shall also cease from being a nation before Me forever.”


    Plain and simple once again. New Covenant. Same Torah. Just like Messiah said Himself in Mathew 5:17-21.

    btw, the fullness of this has NOT happened yet. We are in a betrothal period. It doesn't happen in full until His return at Yom Teruah. One of those unfulfilled Feast Days you don't keep.
     
    #32 Brasso, Oct 29, 2012
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2012
  13. Roering

    Roering
    Expand Collapse
    Sorting nuts

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2008
    5,229
    143
    Location:
    Costa Mesa
    You may want to keep reading through the book of Matthew. Chapter 22: 37-40

    Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself. All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.”

    If Jesus wasn't legalistic when it came to this, why should you be?
     
  14. Brasso

    Brasso
    Expand Collapse
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 1998
    5,226
    539
    Location:
    Stranger in a strange land.
    Because I actually understand what you just posted.

    To keep the Torah fulfills those two commandments. To not keep it breaks one or more of those two commandments.

    And just when did it become "legalistic" to obey God's Word? And if obeying Him makes you a legalist, wouldn't not obeying Him make you an illegalist?

    Might I suggest that when the creator of the heavens and the earth tells us that we should or shouldn't do something, it would be a rather good idea to listen to Him.
     
    #34 Brasso, Oct 30, 2012
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2012
  15. FCoulter

    FCoulter
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2011
    986
    0
    Actually Jesus was being legalistic when He stated this, He was summerizing Gods commandments.
     
  16. Schabesbert

    Schabesbert
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2001
    5,038
    0
    Location:
    Buffalo, NY, USA
    You forgot to address the question regarding whether you are dishonest or committing a logical fallacy.

    I think the evidence is pointing to: both.
     
  17. Glock36shooter

    Glock36shooter
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 30, 2010
    3,157
    0

    Other opinions without any support deleted.
     
  18. Glock36shooter

    Glock36shooter
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 30, 2010
    3,157
    0
    You guys can't even agree what the book says because you've all chosen different interpretations hashed out by YOUR chosen "Scholars". This is the problem with the bible. You really can twist it any way you like. And sometimes you have to in order to keep it from collapsing in on itself due to blatant contradictions and down right errors and misinformation. Mix that with a morality that you'd be arrested for conducting yourself by and you have a religious text that is best left in the sands of the ancient desert it was manufactured in.

    We aren't animals like these "Holy" men were. We can't stone a woman to death because she has sex with whomever she wants. We're simply more civilized than the animals that wrote the bible. We know better than the ideal that homosexuals choose to be homosexual. It's simply as natural as a man being attracted to a woman. We know burning bushes and snakes don't freaking talk. These are fairy tales. Why did the Jews invent a messiah to come and undo the law? Because even they knew the old ways were barbaric. Towards the beginning of the common era the Jews had a bit of a change of heart. They were leaving their ways of sacrifice and law behind. They began surrounding their philosophy around caring for your neighbor and doing right by your fellow man. That this was the way to honor God. Especially after losing their temple for good. With no way to connect with god via a holy place... they began to believe that it was through kindness and charity that one connects with God. This is the idealism that was floating about during the time of Christ. It's no surprise that's what he preached. And if he is most of what history makes of him... he probably was their greatest preacher or messenger. However he probably was a little insane since he thought he was the son of God and had magical powers. But perhaps that's just legend and myth. Jesus would have been a far more impressive man had he not thought himself God in the flesh. That's just the mind of a mad man.
     
  19. Brasso

    Brasso
    Expand Collapse
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 1998
    5,226
    539
    Location:
    Stranger in a strange land.
    Seriously?

    They invented no such thing. It's precisely this line of thinking that prevents them from accepting "Jesus" as the Messiah.

    And your view of the Torah is as skewed as a typicla Christians is.
     
  20. Roering

    Roering
    Expand Collapse
    Sorting nuts

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2008
    5,229
    143
    Location:
    Costa Mesa
    There were over 600 "laws" at the time. Do you keep them all?
    Do you strain all of your drinks?
    And when was the last time you made a burnt offering or sacrificed a lamb?