Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.
Separate names with a comma.
If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.
Discussion in 'Religious Issues' started by Geko45, Oct 26, 2012.
Where is it? Was it deleted?
I know this wasn't directed towards me, but I have a recollection of the altruism discussion hopping threads. That list may have been posted in another thread. Of course, I could be wrong -- it's bound to happen at some point .
You say that but it's not based on fact. You're just parroting the mantras of the anti-gay agenda. You guys never explain how because there is no explanation, it's just how you feel so that's what you say.
How does a person being able to walk into a hospital and visit their life long partner unencumbered by silly rules that they have to be family contribute to the downfall of our society? How does a gay person being able to claim their life long partner's assets after that partner's death as regular married couples do without going through legal battles or special contracts having to be drawn up contribute to the downfall of our society? How does a gay person having any and every convenience afforded to a straight person by our government destroy our country?
The answer is that it doesn't. Those are people that you just don't like. That's evident in your statement that they're just trying to "divide and conquer" us instead of obviously just trying to live their lives as happily and easily as the next guy that happens to be straight. As if destroying your happiness is a bigger priority for them than finding their own as you were allowed to. That's as egotistical a mindset as thinking that you have the almighty on your side backing up your silly claims because you can't. You don't want to be told that they're just as good as you because you need somebody to be better than whether it's the unsaved, the minorities, the liberals or the gays. You don't get that by demonizing people just because they're different than you and as long as you do you're better than no one.
I know where the "altruism" sarcasm is located. Funny, by posting that , he insults his own integrity by insiuating that I have attributed good toward him or his behavior. But out of context....... Looking for the "atheist donation" post.............. can't find it.
As a supporter of Darwinism, how would you explain the concept of "survival of the fittest" if all members were homosexual?
I never said Atheist Charities by the way... (another of your lies). I said NON-RELIGIOUS.
Seriously why are you trying to put words in my mouth. Do you think the argument you've created in your head that I made is easier to debate than the one I actually made?
I disagree. The unified identity of Americans is that we are Americans. America is based on the principle of the a nation containing a vast variety of of peoples, beliefs, family structures, religions, races, and ideals. It is the coexistence of such drastically different individuals that is America. That is our common identity.
Again, I disagree. Liberty and Justice for all... not just those that agree with you. America's ideal is freedom for all. And right now... that's simply not the case.
And you're entitled to your belief... but when you start trying to legislate it... with the ideal that those who do not share your view of what is good and pure in the eyes of God... that is when your belief has stepped into my back yard. And I don't want it there.
How do you maintain that homosexuality ISN'T natural when they can't reproduce and yet we still have homosexuals popping up. Not just in humans... but in other species as well? Must be happening naturally is homosexuals aren't able to pass on the gay gene via reproduction.
And besides... who said anything about all members of a species being homosexual? No one said that. Why do you constantly lie?
The point is over your head if you do not relate the two. In nature, there IS aberrant behavior, so what's your point? If it exists, it is normal?
Again, you just type, no thought to your rhetorical questions.
That it's natural. Normal means nothing. And that Normal is good or bad means less than nothing.
No, not really. Where does your definition of aberrant come from? It is a subjective definition that comes from you, not nature. The point being, if no one is around to define the idea of aberrant then there is no such thing. Even when someone does, that opinion is only valid for them.
That's your big issue? You're worried about humans dying out because of too much of teh ghey going around? 7 billion people isn't enough for you? This is where you show the desperation of your position, by relying on a system that you don't even believe in to support your arguments.
There will always be enough heterosexual people to keep the population up. Even if every single person was gay that wouldn't really be a bad thing since they could still reproduce if they really wanted to and a world where people only reproduced if they really wanted to would be a wonderful place.
Damn fine point. And it would also be one where abortion didn't exist.
<table class="ts"><tbody><tr><td style="padding-bottom:5px;padding-top:5px;color:#666" valign="top" width="80px">Adjective:</td><td style="padding-bottom:5px;padding-top:5px" valign="top"><table class="ts"><tbody><tr><td>
Departing from an accepted standard.
Diverging from the normal type.
</td></tr></tbody></table></td></tr></tbody></table>What other types of "aberrant" behaviors should we suppress simply because they diverge from the norm? I could pick any one of the activities that you may enjoy yet 51% of the population do not and call it "aberrant". Does that give me license to suppress that activity simply because most people don't swing that way?
The real question that you're avoiding, as your are so adept at, is how does that behavior in others adversly affect you, or anyone else, other than your inability to deal with it?
Oh god! The irony! It burns!
Back to twisting
If you support homosexuality, fine. I don't, I would discourage it. Your pal brought up the subject days ago, not me.
Callin' in the "gang" 36 ? LOL
That's your department... ya liar.
I didn't call anyone. You just beg to be hammered into the dirt with your dumb comments.
We should form a Gang though... We could have like jackets and stuff. Or jerseys. And matching rear cover plates for our Glocks.