close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Jack Welch was right, sort-of....

Discussion in 'The Okie Corral' started by .264 magnum, Oct 26, 2012.

  1. .264 magnum

    .264 magnum CLM

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2002
    Messages:
    12,990
    Likes Received:
    581
    Location:
    Dallas TX
    http://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/2012/10/25/data-points-to-calif-as-jobless-claims-culprit/

    Looks like California made a reporting error a couple of weeks ago leading to that week's surprisingly good initial claims number and the U3 number thus looks suspect.


    ETA - looks like a number of people in the media owe Welch an apology. He wasn't precisely right, the books weren't cooked they were wrong.

    ETA II - apparently Cali has been producing really bad numbers, as in significantly incorrect, consistently for at least a couple of years.
     
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2012
  2. TheJ

    TheJ NRA Life Member Lifetime Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    104
    Location:
    GA
    The problem is he could have gotten the same point across much better if he had framed it a little differently. He should have stuck more with alleging the number was simply wrong (which most of us know it was upon scrutiny) versus implying actual manipulation by the administration, which he should have know would be incredibly unlikely to be proven true (even if it happened).
     

  3. kensb2

    kensb2 pistol n00b

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    1,464
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Apache, OK
    So then, what were the 'real' U-3 numbers for last month? Probably still over 8%? I'm sure the error, and the subsequently adjusted % will get far less media coverage than the fact that Obama had suddenly gotten the # under 8%.
     
  4. .264 magnum

    .264 magnum CLM

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2002
    Messages:
    12,990
    Likes Received:
    581
    Location:
    Dallas TX
    Agreed. Apparently, California will offer up an explanation later today.

    I can already hear, "computer glitch" in the wind.
     
  5. .264 magnum

    .264 magnum CLM

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2002
    Messages:
    12,990
    Likes Received:
    581
    Location:
    Dallas TX
    That's a good question. The BLS will fix the numbers and publish them likely today. I'll check now.


    ETA - nothing yet.
     
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2012
  6. Bren

    Bren NRA Life Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Messages:
    44,531
    Likes Received:
    12,866
    Location:
    Kentucky
    So, by not "cooked" you mean it was pure coincidence that, (1) at this point before the election, (2) a very liberal state (3) and an agency headed by an Obama contributor (4) provided "incorrect" information that made Obama look good?



    Yeah, could be.:whistling:
     
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2012
  7. Dragoon189

    Dragoon189

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2012
    Messages:
    280
    Likes Received:
    0
    November 2nd, the oct numbers will be out and maybe even right
     
  8. .264 magnum

    .264 magnum CLM

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2002
    Messages:
    12,990
    Likes Received:
    581
    Location:
    Dallas TX


    It looks bad but intentionally fudging the numbers one week is a career ender and a crime. Moreover it's a crime that is guaranteed to be noticed. The weird looking numbers by economists within hours and by the BLS within a couple/three weeks at worst. I'd argue that the BLS types should have noticed immediately.

    Oddities:
    1. I need to know what happened and WHY the Cali UE office didn't simply know the numbers were wrong by just looking at them. I heard a labor economist at BC IIRC who is on record sending an email to Cali within an hour of the numbers being released. He simply knew they were wrong.

    2. Why didn't the BLS protest immediately.

    3. How in the heck did the press miss this almost entirely until now.

    4. The timing. This looks really bad.


    I can't wait to find out what's up.
     
  9. .264 magnum

    .264 magnum CLM

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2002
    Messages:
    12,990
    Likes Received:
    581
    Location:
    Dallas TX

    I'm thinking the BLS may have to run a, "right now" correction today.
     
  10. G36's Rule

    G36's Rule Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2001
    Messages:
    9,373
    Likes Received:
    85
    Location:
    Spring, TX.
    Yeah, just an error. :faint:
     
  11. Z71bill

    Z71bill

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2007
    Messages:
    16,027
    Likes Received:
    3,163
    Location:
    Texas
    I thought Jack was claiming the last jobs report was wrong - 800K jobs created - drop in unemployment rate to 7.8% --

    This article seems to be talking about the initial jobless claim numbers - that showed a drop.

    Still aren't these two completely different things?

    One is jobs created - total employment - work force participation -unemployment rate -

    The other is number of (new) people filing for unemployment compensation.
     
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2012
  12. .264 magnum

    .264 magnum CLM

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2002
    Messages:
    12,990
    Likes Received:
    581
    Location:
    Dallas TX
    I made a booboo in my open post I'll fix that.

    I saw Welch on TV (MSNBC I think) the day after his claim. He thesis was an increase of 115K jobs (or whatever the precise number was) didn't jibe with the U3 rate falling roughly 3/10 of a point. He clearly understood that the metrics are linked weakly but trend out over time.

    I've got to say. Given that Cali's. initial claims were off and initial jobless claims nationally haven't looked good. The U3 number form last month does look weird.



    ETA - you are right the UE rate is complied from 60,000 households every month - it's called The Current Population Survey. I'm wondering if there might be a significant revision on Nov. 2?
     
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2012
  13. aircarver

    aircarver Descent Terminated Silver Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2002
    Messages:
    29,031
    Likes Received:
    5,404
    Location:
    Ft. Worth, Republic of Texas
    Y'know what 'Occam's Razor' says about this ... :upeyes:

    .
     
  14. cj5mrt

    cj5mrt

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2005
    Messages:
    930
    Likes Received:
    16
    Location:
    Central FL
    "It looks bad but intentionally fudging the numbers one week is a career ender and a crime."
    Since when has something being a crime been a deterrent to anyone in Oblamer's administration?:tongueout: