close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

"I've got nothing to hide..."

Discussion in 'The Okie Corral' started by Annhl8rX, Apr 19, 2013.

  1. Annhl8rX

    Annhl8rX

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2007
    Messages:
    2,837
    Likes Received:
    19
    Location:
    Lone Star State
    That phrase gets a bad rap around here. The thing is, it's a completely reasonable thing to say in a lot of situations. As long as it's done on a case by case basis, you're not "surrendering to the nanny state", "letting your rights be trampled", or any of the other catchphrases that float around here.

    If you're talking about check points, gun registration, involuntary searches during traffic stops, or something else that requires surrendering your ability to refuse I definitely, I agree that it is a stupid thing to say.

    When it is a one time concession, you truly do have nothing to hide, and allowing the search serves a greater good (whether it be the continued search for a fugitive, your convenience, or something else), there is no harm in going along.

    I know there's nothing illegal in my house. If a dangerous person were on the loose in my neighborhood and the police wanted to search, I'd have no problem with it. If you would refuse simply on principle, that's your right. You're a fool to exercise it, though.

    My two cents. Feel free to disagree.
     
  2. certifiedfunds

    certifiedfunds Tewwowist

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2008
    Messages:
    55,704
    Likes Received:
    8,063
    See. Like this. Calling someone a fool for refusing a search.


    Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
     

  3. Annhl8rX

    Annhl8rX

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2007
    Messages:
    2,837
    Likes Received:
    19
    Location:
    Lone Star State
    That's a blanket statement that doesn't accurately reflect what I said.
     
  4. Gareth68

    Gareth68

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,247
    Likes Received:
    110
    Location:
    Missouri....West of Mexico
    " I have nothing to hide, you may investigate anything that trips your fancy within plain sight, without inconveniencing me."
     
  5. Huaco Kid

    Huaco Kid

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    Messages:
    12,752
    Likes Received:
    5,293
    Location:
    State
    I, actually, have nothing to hide.

    Therefore, I don't mind the TSA violating every right that I inherited.
     
  6. Annhl8rX

    Annhl8rX

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2007
    Messages:
    2,837
    Likes Received:
    19
    Location:
    Lone Star State
    If you don't mind it and consent to it, it's not violating anything. That's the whole point.
     
  7. 427

    427

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2009
    Messages:
    6,997
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    KUMSC
    [​IMG]
     
  8. Patchman

    Patchman Florist

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Messages:
    17,329
    Likes Received:
    2,558
    Location:
    Land of Flora, Fauna & Merriweather
    Don't travel by common carrier airlines.
     
  9. NeverMore1701

    NeverMore1701 Fear no Evil Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    Messages:
    39,755
    Likes Received:
    5,564
    Location:
    Amarillo, Tx
    I have all sorts of stuff to hide. Not because it's illegal, but because it's nobody's damn business but my own.
     
  10. certifiedfunds

    certifiedfunds Tewwowist

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2008
    Messages:
    55,704
    Likes Received:
    8,063
    It's none of your concern if or why someone exercises their rights.


    Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
     
  11. racerford

    racerford

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2003
    Messages:
    4,964
    Likes Received:
    506
    Location:
    DFW area
    I would say it is pretty accurate.

    "If a dangerous person were on the loose in my neighborhood and the police wanted to search, I'd have no problem with it. If you would refuse simply on principle, that's your right. You're a fool to exercise it, though."

    I think you referring to the fact he left out the first sentence of this. However, you are saying that a person that refuses is a fool. It was a pretty blanket statement on your part. If I have controlled access to my house, and so know said dangerous person is not in it, there is no reason for me to allow them to search inside my house. Would I let them search out where I had not been in control of the access? Very likely.

    If you feel a need to re-qualify your statement, go ahead. If not, CF has you dead to rights.
     
  12. Annhl8rX

    Annhl8rX

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2007
    Messages:
    2,837
    Likes Received:
    19
    Location:
    Lone Star State
    It's plenty of my concern when someone holds up a search for a dangerous person because they are afraid the police might find their embarrassing stash of porn. It's your right to refuse. I support that right, but I think you're a selfish idiot for exercising it.

    You may think I'm a sheep for surrendering my rights in certain situations, which is a right of yours as well. Based on posts I've seen from you in the past, you and I are just going to have to agree to disagree.
     
  13. Annhl8rX

    Annhl8rX

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2007
    Messages:
    2,837
    Likes Received:
    19
    Location:
    Lone Star State
    First of all, nobody has anybody "dead to rights" in a discussion of opinion.

    Second of all...just because you know nobody is in your house doesn't mean anybody else does. In that situation, it serves the greater good more to let them verify the wanted person is not there. Not doing so places doubt, and possibly ties up resources watching the house you wouldn't let them into.
     
  14. DanaT

    DanaT Pharaoh

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2005
    Messages:
    24,908
    Likes Received:
    2,842
    Location:
    CO & Baden –Württemberg
    Is consent under duress consent?

    If I hold a gun to a woman's head so she gives me consent to have sex with her, do I truly have consent?
     
  15. Z71bill

    Z71bill

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2007
    Messages:
    16,039
    Likes Received:
    3,186
    Location:
    Texas
    The - go ahead and search - I have nothing to hind -

    Is a variation of --

    Why do you want to exercise your right to remain silent - IF YOU HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE?

    You MUST BE GUILTY if you don't want to talk to the government.
     
  16. DanaT

    DanaT Pharaoh

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2005
    Messages:
    24,908
    Likes Received:
    2,842
    Location:
    CO & Baden –Württemberg
    Shall we bet on that?

    Do you have any prescription pills not in their original bottle? As an example in a dispenser that you put them in for the day so you know if you forgot?

    Do you have any tax returns in your house? You have made an illegal statement on them.

    Do you have any goods in your house that you ordered over the internet / via mail order that you did not pay the use tax on?

    You would be surprised what you have that you think is legal but by the letter of the law is illegal.
     
  17. DanaT

    DanaT Pharaoh

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2005
    Messages:
    24,908
    Likes Received:
    2,842
    Location:
    CO & Baden –Württemberg
    Taking 100% of your pay check and distributing as needed for society serves the greater good more than you keeping the money. When are you going to start doing things for the greater good and turn over all your money to the govt?

    After all, its all about the greater good.
     
  18. samurairabbi

    samurairabbi Dungeon Schmuck

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 1998
    Messages:
    5,894
    Likes Received:
    41
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
    Your having nothing to hide does not protect you from an imperious authority deciding it needs you to be guilty of something because it needs a good headline or a quick closure to an inconvenient circumstance. Such overbearing.authority incidents are common. Protection of the innocent from such intrusion is a valid social purpose.
     
  19. Patchman

    Patchman Florist

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Messages:
    17,329
    Likes Received:
    2,558
    Location:
    Land of Flora, Fauna & Merriweather
    In the Watertown incident, we know the BG was hiding in somebody's property. What we don't know is how many homeowners refused to let LE check, or (more likely) assured LE that no unauthorized person(s) was/were present, and the LEOs moved on to the next property.
     
  20. Annhl8rX

    Annhl8rX

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2007
    Messages:
    2,837
    Likes Received:
    19
    Location:
    Lone Star State
    Nope...but you're the first person to bring that up.