close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

Indiana First State to Allow Citizens to Shoot Law Enforcement Officers

Discussion in 'Civil Liberties Issues' started by 45/50, Jun 12, 2012.


  1. samurairabbi

    samurairabbi Dungeon Schmuck

    5,894
    39
    Dec 31, 1998
    Indianapolis, IN
    Nothing in the new law precludes Law Enforcement Officers from SHOOTING BACK! ... :whistling:
     
  2. RussP

    RussP Moderator

    33,788
    3,435
    Jan 23, 2003
    Central Virginia
    Perhaps you might want to read the law before getting all warm and fuzzy about shooting a cop.

    http://www.in.gov/legislative/bills/2012/ES/ES0001.2.html

    There was a lengthy discussion in Cop Talk earlier this year: Indiana house approves bill authorizing the shooting of Police Officers.

    And there is a current discussion here: Indiana legalizes shooting police officers?
     
  3. Bravo 1

    Bravo 1 Serious Infidel CLM

    422
    10
    Sep 21, 2005
    Earth
    I don't really understand why police would get all butt hurt over this law.

    As long as they are there legally, and have a warrant, and don't violate a property owners's/citizen's rights, there isn't an issue.

    From how LEO powers have been trending the last 10 years anyway, I'm glad to see some powers go the other direction.

    A police state is not good.
     
  4. Mister_Beefy

    Mister_Beefy Legal & Proper

    2,417
    0
    Apr 19, 2011
  5. SgtScott31

    SgtScott31

    355
    0
    Jan 17, 2011
    Because officers entering houses illegally and firing upon innocent people is such a widespread problem. :upeyes: Give me a break. No-knock warrants are only allowed under strict circumstances. Although there have been very RARE incidents where the wrong house was entered, LEOs serving these type warrants are getting very dangerous folks off the streets.

    Don't read much into this bill. It will never affect 99.9% of the U.S. population. I wish a few in favor of this could go on a few search warrants to get the perspective of the LEOs. Matter of fact, put the stats together of those LEOs killed executing a search warrant versus innocent citizens killed as a result of a LEOs illegally entering their house. It's not even a comparison.
     
  6. Bravo 1

    Bravo 1 Serious Infidel CLM

    422
    10
    Sep 21, 2005
    Earth

    Exactly.
     
  7. Kingarthurhk

    Kingarthurhk Isaiah 53:4-9

    8,187
    172
    Sep 5, 2010
    Texas
    Interesting, I thought you would be moving there by now?:upeyes:
     
  8. Kingarthurhk

    Kingarthurhk Isaiah 53:4-9

    8,187
    172
    Sep 5, 2010
    Texas
    I do. The next team that comes down to your drug den with a warrant, you will open fire and try to get out of a First Degree Murder charge by stating you thought they were making an unlawful entry.
     
  9. Bravo 1

    Bravo 1 Serious Infidel CLM

    422
    10
    Sep 21, 2005
    Earth

    OHHHHHH,,, SAVE THE POLICE!!!!!!!

    THERE WILL BE BLOOD IN THE STREETS!!!!!!!!!!

    SAVE THE CHILDREN TOOOOO!!!

    SAVE THE TREES!!!

    SAVE THE WATER!!!


    Same old B.S. as the tree huggers and anti-gunners.

    Get over it, now the police will actually have to pay attention and no-knock the correct address.
     
  10. SgtScott31

    SgtScott31

    355
    0
    Jan 17, 2011
    The bill is a complete waste of taxpayer money. I guarantee if an actual REAL study was done about erroneous warrant entries, it would be around the .00000000000001 percentile.
     
  11. Bravo 1

    Bravo 1 Serious Infidel CLM

    422
    10
    Sep 21, 2005
    Earth
    So then, the police should get over it, stop whining and go about their business of protecting us poor defenseless little sheep from the bad guys.

    Good deal, I feel safer already.
     
  12. Kingarthurhk

    Kingarthurhk Isaiah 53:4-9

    8,187
    172
    Sep 5, 2010
    Texas
    "Save the drug dealer!"

    "Save the serial killer!"

    "Save the child abductor!"

    Does that sound like your mantra? Given your reaction, it does.

    No one is taking your firearms away unless you are an illegal alien or a convicted felon. Are you either one of those?
     
  13. Kingarthurhk

    Kingarthurhk Isaiah 53:4-9

    8,187
    172
    Sep 5, 2010
    Texas
    Are you upset because you are one?
     
  14. Bravo 1

    Bravo 1 Serious Infidel CLM

    422
    10
    Sep 21, 2005
    Earth


    HAHAHA,,, yup.

    You nailed it. :wavey:
     
  15. Bravo 1

    Bravo 1 Serious Infidel CLM

    422
    10
    Sep 21, 2005
    Earth
    You nailed it too.

    You must be a psychic or sumpthin'

    (Obviously you missed the whole point altogether)
     
  16. samurairabbi

    samurairabbi Dungeon Schmuck

    5,894
    39
    Dec 31, 1998
    Indianapolis, IN
    This controversy in meaningless to my situation. The new law has not removed my right to bore a policeman to death.

    Hey, I know what is VITAL for survival!