close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

If the SHTF will you be capable of Physical Violence against another?

Discussion in 'Survival/Preparedness Forum' started by DoctaGlockta, May 22, 2012.

  1. Not sure if I've seen this topic on here but it is a good one to consider.

    Some of you are most likely military or LEO so you may have shot at someone before perhaps even wounded or ended a life.

    But for civilians these days some or quite possibly most have never really had to 'fight' someone or have physically injure someone on purpose.

    Back in the day fist fights on the playground were common and that is how things got settled. However these days this is a no-no. Some may have never been in a real life physical confrontation before.

    If society goes awry chances are that you might have to defend yourself. Quite possibly in a face to face close encounter.

    Have you ever been attacked before by someone that wanted to inflict harm on you or a loved one and what did you do?

    If you have never been in that position you may want to really think about what you could do.
     
  2. alabaster

    alabaster Swollen Member

    871
    0
    Mar 18, 2009
    This could go in that other thread about questions that ought not be asked on the interweb........
     


  3. concretefuzzynuts

    concretefuzzynuts Brew Crew

    7,475
    13
    Dec 27, 2011
    PNW
    Careful answering this. Think of the trove of evidence a prosecutor could glean from your answer.
     
  4. cyrsequipment

    cyrsequipment Angry

    1,693
    1
    Aug 8, 2004
    Maine
    I could NEVER hurt another person. That is why I gave away all my guns and sharp objects.
     
  5. thesurefire

    thesurefire

    133
    2
    Apr 16, 2006
    Colorado
    Keep this in mind.

    Avoiding conflict is the way to go. That said, ask a solider if they felt guilty about firing back once engaged.
     
  6. tuica

    tuica

    1,895
    61
    Apr 28, 2009
    Portland,Oregon
    If we did not have that ability, we would not have survived as a species. And if good citizens did not have the capacity for violence - evil would rule the earth. A right, and comforting notion. Cheers.
     
  7. Snaps

    Snaps Hail 2 The King

    3,787
    98
    Apr 8, 2004
    SWPA sticks
    I'm a combat vet, I had enough of violence. Now instead of the NRA I'm a member of the DAV and Wounded Warrior Project. I have sold or turned in all my guns as well as blunt or sharp objects to prevent more violence.
     
  8. pugman

    pugman

    6,100
    255
    May 16, 2003
    Wisconsin
    Rule #1 is to avoid the conflict if at all possible. World goes to *&^$ something tells me you can't call 911 (even if you win the fight) if/when you get injured. I don't think a doctor is a phone call away and hosptials might be so jammed full the broken arm you have might be a long way down the priority list.

    Rule #2 Don't underestimate your opponent.

    At 5'7 I have no disillusions about my ability to fight a larger opponent. I've been in two fights my entire life...one I ran from (and the guy eventually became my best friend :dunno:) the other I stood my ground and the guy just walked away..

    Well I guess I've never been in a fight.

    If the world goes to heck, my job is to fight as absolutely as dirty as possible to incapacitate a person as quickly as I can.

    Hand, foot or whatever I can get my hands on...meet b****
     
  9. kirgi08

    kirgi08 Watcher. Silver Member

    34,302
    3,485
    Jun 4, 2007
    Acme proving grounds.
  10. 93GT

    93GT The Ogre

    1,733
    0
    Jul 6, 2002
  11. bdcochran

    bdcochran

    3,329
    333
    Sep 23, 2005
    Los Angeles
    I will respond to the caption.

    1. anyone is capable of physical resistance except perhaps a quadriplegic.

    2. any person with martial artist experience will inform you that the first thing a competent instructor emphasizes is to avoid a fight and to avoid contact.

    3. there is a mantra in competent shooting instruction that distance means safety. The same applies in physical combat.

    4. Pugman - the smaller person in trained in the martial arts actually has the advantage over a larger person.

    5. no matter what the training, when you grapple, you give up a lot of your advantage, if any.

    6. OP - even monitored, careful practice in the fighting skills produces injuries - been there (hospitalized).

    7. As Bruce Lee said, you need only 5 moves. Human ergonomics dictates the basic (same ) moves in escrima, knife fighting, entrenching tool fighting using your arms.

    8. I don't advocate hurting people. I advocate learning human ergonomics, daily exercise, situational awareness and being physically fit. No, I haven't had a fight since probably 1957. And then, OP, I had no choice and took on 7 and only needed to beat the first opponent before the others ran.
     
  12. concretefuzzynuts

    concretefuzzynuts Brew Crew

    7,475
    13
    Dec 27, 2011
    PNW
    On a side note, I'll be interested to see if the prosecutor in the Zimmerman case has any internet forum posts from George. For example a gun forum.
     
  13. Quigley

    Quigley Elite Member

    3,323
    8
    Mar 17, 2010
    Virginia
    I am Caucasian and I grew up in the hood, so yes


    Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
     
  14. wjv

    wjv

    13,797
    1,222
    Jan 17, 2002
    Pacific NW
    In a REAL SHTF scenario, my family's chance of survival would be greatly decreased if I was killed/injured. .

    I have no desire to see my daughters or my wife die, so the answer is yes. .
     
  15. TactiCool

    TactiCool

    573
    0
    Feb 1, 2012
    Southeast LA.
    During said scenario, I will simply push the red button. Many complicated and marvelous things will happen when I do that.
     
    Last edited: May 22, 2012
  16. jdavionic

    jdavionic NRA Member

    14,903
    2,657
    May 1, 2008
    To protect myself and my loved ones, yes. I have no desire to hurt an innocent person. Once that line is crossed from innocent to threat, I have no issues at all in responding to ensure that there is no longer a threat.
     
  17. beatcop

    beatcop

    2,034
    96
    Aug 13, 2003
    New England
    ...not worried about my proclivity...worried about the other guy's.

    When two rational "armed" people meet, they may have a thought process. When a hood rat decides to jack me for sneakers, that's a problem...not sure what he's thinking.

    The real issue is what degree of pre-emptive violence are inclined to perform, what level of physical discomfort will you endure before you place your needs ahead of others-and act.

    Prior threads have revealed juveniles, predators, and morally compromised persons posting here...sometimes "don't go there" is best.
     
    Last edited: May 22, 2012
  18. RMTactical

    RMTactical www.AR15pro.net CLM

    12,603
    16
    Oct 7, 2000
    Behind an AR-15
    I don't ever want to harm another person. However, I will not flinch in defending my family from great bodily harm or death. I feel that I am charged with their personal protection and it is a sacred duty IMO, and it is something I take very seriously.
     
  19. G29Reload

    G29Reload Tread Lightly

    13,286
    363
    Sep 28, 2009
    I'm capable of self defense right damn now if necessary.
     
  20. RedHaze

    RedHaze Handgunner

    2,397
    8
    Aug 23, 2009
    SE WA
    I went there, I did that, and I got the ribbon for it. I have no issue with putting down the wolves that mistake me or my family for sheep.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]