close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

I believe...

Discussion in 'Religious Issues' started by ArrowJ, Dec 6, 2012.

  1. If so, that makes them hypocrites. If they obey God's law when it's convenient and ignore it the rest of the time, then their beliefs have no credibility. All one has to do to ignore God's law is declare a state of war. War on poverty, war on drugs, the list goes on ad infinitum. All things can justify war and war can justify all things.
     
  2. Japle

    Japle John, Viera, Fl

    820
    12
    Feb 26, 2000
    Viera, Florida
    Deal with the subject at hand or admit you can't handle it.
    Using war to justify your god's approval of slavery won't work.
     


  3. inertia186

    inertia186

    28
    0
    Dec 17, 2012
    California
    Actually, that's how all of the nations went about it, not just the Hebrew nation. If you didn't enslave your enemies, you had to kill them. The alternative was to allow their culture to invade after the war was over.

    Your critique of God is that He didn't use an anachronistic approach to break into human history.
     
  4. Japle

    Japle John, Viera, Fl

    820
    12
    Feb 26, 2000
    Viera, Florida
    Nope. My problem (well, one of them) with the god of the OT is that he didn't tell his people to stop slavery. He certainly could have done that, but he didn't. He told them how to conduct slavery.

    He never said slavery was undesirable. He never said there was anything wrong with buying and selling people, breaking up families or killing slaves as long as it was done according to his rules.

    Are you defending his advice on slavery? Do you think the Hebrews should have followed his laws and continued to be slave owners?
     
  5. inertia186

    inertia186

    28
    0
    Dec 17, 2012
    California
    Do you have the same critique of the US Constitution?
     
  6. Japle

    Japle John, Viera, Fl

    820
    12
    Feb 26, 2000
    Viera, Florida
    Tell the truth, 186, are you under 14 years of age? Do you seriously think the adults here can’t tell when you have no answers and constantly try to change the subject so you won’t have to admit it?
     
  7. Animal Mother

    Animal Mother Not Enough Gun

    13,269
    226
    Mar 22, 2004
    I don't recall anyone claiming either the US Constitution or the men who composed it were inerrant.
     
  8. inertia186

    inertia186

    28
    0
    Dec 17, 2012
    California
    Inerrancy is not at issue. Merely, is it valid to throw out an entire document that includes instructions that modern eyes view as objectionable? Or does that document have some concessions that are consistent for the time and place they were written?
     
  9. NMG26

    NMG26

    7,189
    199
    Jul 24, 2010
    NM
    Inertia186 has never said that the Bible was inerrant. That is a fundamentalist belief. He did lead with fundamentalist doctrine, but does not seem to be able to argue it. A good thing really.
     
  10. NMG26

    NMG26

    7,189
    199
    Jul 24, 2010
    NM
    The forum is "I believe".

    So what do you say.

    What do you believe about the Bible?
     
  11. inertia186

    inertia186

    28
    0
    Dec 17, 2012
    California
    I believe inerrancy, but as I said, that's not being debated.
     
  12. Japle

    Japle John, Viera, Fl

    820
    12
    Feb 26, 2000
    Viera, Florida
    Inertia186 is in a tough spot. He (?) wants to believe the Bible in inerrant, but he can’t defend his god’s support of slavery. His only recourse is to do his best to avoid discussing that – and who can blame him – and discuss anything else.

    Now, he says he believes in inerrancy, but won’t debate it. No wonder. Debating inerrancy would just lead him back to defending slavery.
     
  13. Lowjiber

    Lowjiber

    941
    1
    Jan 26, 2012
    Las Vegas
    I believe that a Religious Issues Forum does not belong on a gun forum.
     
  14. How does one decide what parts are in error and which parts aren't? It seems to me that it comes down to personal opinion. If one's personal opinion is the criteria, they why does one need the Bible to decide right and wrong?
     
  15. Japle

    Japle John, Viera, Fl

    820
    12
    Feb 26, 2000
    Viera, Florida
    See post #91.
     
  16. Beliefs can be based on fact or fiction. Belief in the supernatural has to be based on fiction. If there was factual evidence evidence for the supernatural, then it wouldn't be supernatural.

    There is factual evidence for gravity, evolution, and so on. There's no factual evidence for a supernatural being. Since there's no factual evidence at the moment, the logical conclusion is that one does not exists.
     
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2013
  17. inertia186

    inertia186

    28
    0
    Dec 17, 2012
    California
    *concession of slavery
     
  18. Japle

    Japle John, Viera, Fl

    820
    12
    Feb 26, 2000
    Viera, Florida
    A distinction without a difference.
     
  19. ArrowJ

    ArrowJ

    268
    1
    Jun 2, 2004
    Illinois
    Is it safe to say you never make concessions for things you find abhorrent?
     
  20. Japle

    Japle John, Viera, Fl

    820
    12
    Feb 26, 2000
    Viera, Florida
    Yes. There are, for instance, no circumstances under which I would make concessions for slavery.