close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

I believe...

Discussion in 'Religious Issues' started by ArrowJ, Dec 6, 2012.

  1. Animal Mother

    Animal Mother Not Enough Gun

    13,279
    227
    Mar 22, 2004
    You're completely wrong. They were sold exactly the same way. It is true that slaves could, with the permission of their owners, earn money and even buy their freedom in some cases, but that was neither required nor even the norm throughout the majority of Roman history.
    It is true that some slaves became enslaved as a result of debts, but that was hardly the only route to slavery. Read Caesar's The Gallic Wars, he enslaved entire towns and tribes, the Veneti for example.
     
  2. inertia186

    inertia186

    28
    0
    Dec 17, 2012
    California
    The way this thread was going, I thought we were including more than just Rome in "the ancient world."
     


  3. Animal Mother

    Animal Mother Not Enough Gun

    13,279
    227
    Mar 22, 2004
    How does that change anything? You claim slavery in the ancient world was different than slavery in the United States. You claimed that ancient slaves were bondservants, not property. This was incorrect. I provided the example of Roman slaves captured in war.

    Even if we take the "ancient world" as more expansive than just Rome, the fact remains that there were slaves that you describe as chattel in Rome, which was part of the ancient world, which renders your initial proposition false.
     
  4. Japle

    Japle John, Viera, Fl

    820
    12
    Feb 26, 2000
    Viera, Florida
    inertia186 is flopping like a fish on the dock.
     
  5. If this is true, why was Onesimus in prison?
     
    Last edited: Dec 31, 2012
  6. inertia186

    inertia186

    28
    0
    Dec 17, 2012
    California
    Ok, TIL that all ancient slavery was chattel slavery.
     
  7. Animal Mother

    Animal Mother Not Enough Gun

    13,279
    227
    Mar 22, 2004
    I didn't say that, did I? Hopefully, you have learned that chattel slavery did exist in the ancient world, if you were not already aware of that fact. If you have evidence for one type of slavery being rejected by either Biblical command or Christian practice, please do share it. As far as I know, no one knows the nature of Onesimus' slavery and he was perhaps the most famous slave of Christian accounts.
     
  8. inertia186

    inertia186

    28
    0
    Dec 17, 2012
    California
    So you're saying there might have been bondservants (slavery by way of economic circumstances) as well as chattel slaves (slavery by way of military conquest) in the ancient world?
     
  9. Animal Mother

    Animal Mother Not Enough Gun

    13,279
    227
    Mar 22, 2004
    No, I'm not saying that at all. In fact, I said the exact opposite of that:
    On the other hand, you did claim that there weren't slave markets in the ancient world comparable to those in America:
     
  10. inertia186

    inertia186

    28
    0
    Dec 17, 2012
    California
    I said that slaves weren't bought and sold in the same way because I contend that there were at least two kinds of slavery, as opposed to the more modern historical occurrence.

    I find it baffling that there were no bondservants in any ancient context. Apparently I just made them up out of thin air.
     
  11. Animal Mother

    Animal Mother Not Enough Gun

    13,279
    227
    Mar 22, 2004
    Actually you initially claimed that there was only one kind, and repeated that claim when I asked you to clarify:


    I find it more baffling that you're making this claim when no one has denied the existence of debt slavery in the ancient world.
     
  12. inertia186

    inertia186

    28
    0
    Dec 17, 2012
    California
    Then maybe you could help me understand how to phrase this in the exact opposite:

     
  13. Animal Mother

    Animal Mother Not Enough Gun

    13,279
    227
    Mar 22, 2004
    I misread that post originally, and apologize for that. Nevertheless the fact remains that you first claimed one sort of slavery didn't exist and still have provided no reason to conclude that the same sort of slavery practiced in recent times was not also the slavery described in the Bible.
     
  14. inertia186

    inertia186

    28
    0
    Dec 17, 2012
    California
    I said slaves were not bought and sold in the same way.
     
  15. Animal Mother

    Animal Mother Not Enough Gun

    13,279
    227
    Mar 22, 2004
    Yes, you did. That was incorrect. The fact that bondservants or debt slaves existed does not remove the existence of either slave markets or what you describe as chattel slavery.
     
  16. inertia186

    inertia186

    28
    0
    Dec 17, 2012
    California
    You're going to have to explain to me then, how bondservants and chattel slaves were sold in the same way.

    I would maintain that they were not sold in the same way. For example, I don't think a bondservant would be traded for a chattel slave or via versa.

    I don't think the two systems were in any way "compatible" with one another.

    It seems like bondservants were a lot more formal a system. Chattel was pure racial/nationalistic oppression akin to genocide while debt slaves were simply an economic solution, albeit a distasteful one to our "modern standards."
     
  17. Japle

    Japle John, Viera, Fl

    820
    12
    Feb 26, 2000
    Viera, Florida
    All this back-and-forth about bondservants vs. chattel slaves is just so much misdirection.

    I post #32, inertia186 implies that the slavery described in the OT is something other than chattel slavery. All the references to "slavery in the ancient world” and “there were no bondservants in any ancient context” are smoke and mirrors to distract us from the Biblical commentary mandating the treatment of slaves.

    I ask again, if the slavery described in the OT is something other than chattel slavery, how do you explain:

    However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way. (Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT)

    If you buy a Hebrew slave, he is to serve for only six years. Set him free in the seventh year, and he will owe you nothing for his freedom. If he was single when he became your slave and then married afterward, only he will go free in the seventh year. But if he was married before he became a slave, then his wife will be freed with him. If his master gave him a wife while he was a slave, and they had sons or daughters, then the man will be free in the seventh year, but his wife and children will still belong to his master. But the slave may plainly declare, 'I love my master, my wife, and my children. I would rather not go free.' If he does this, his master must present him before God. Then his master must take him to the door and publicly pierce his ear with an awl. After that, the slave will belong to his master forever. (Exodus 21:2-6 NLT)

    When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, the slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his own property. (Exodus 21:20-21 NAB)
     
  18. inertia186

    inertia186

    28
    0
    Dec 17, 2012
    California
    While it's true that even in the New Testament, slavery was not condemned, the New Testament requires that masters treat their slaves with respect.

    More importantly, the New Testament emphasizes spiritual equality of slave and free in the church (Gal. 2:28; 1 Cor. 12:13; Col 3:11), and slaves are encouraged to seek their freedom (1 Cor. 7:21-24).

    In the late 1700s, when slavery came under attack, these teachings helped to undermine the institution of slavery.
     
  19. Japle

    Japle John, Viera, Fl

    820
    12
    Feb 26, 2000
    Viera, Florida
    So, bottom line, chattel slavery was approved by the writers of the OT.

    Thanks for clearing that up.
     
  20. inertia186

    inertia186

    28
    0
    Dec 17, 2012
    California
    There was a higher standard of living requirement imposed by the OT on Hebrews who had slaves, as compared to the other occupiers at the time.