close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

HST or Ranger T

Discussion in 'Caliber Corner' started by G21MAN, Feb 8, 2012.


  1. G21MAN

    G21MAN
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    201
    0
    Location:
    Gilbert, AZ
    I watched a test of 165 gr Ranger T this morning on youtube. It was by Tennessee Outdoors. These two bullets expanded to .86 of an inch through 4 layers of denim and into Sim Test media. The HST 180 grain that he tested the same way only expanded to .78 of an inch. I always thought that the HST expanded more than the Ranger T. Is this an unusual event, or do the Ranger T's expand better than the HST's?
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
  2. up1911fan

    up1911fan
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2009
    4,582
    2
    Location:
    Upper Michigan
    Your talking about one bullet each. It's by no means a mean average. Those two and Gold Dot's are the only loads I carry.
     

  3. NucPhysics

    NucPhysics
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2009
    134
    0
    Watch the HSTs carefully. They are an excellent round, however, I have seen many of them that had loose metal burs inside the hollow point due to the fact that the jacket isn't bonded to the core. Knowing that loose metal shards don't do well inside a handgun or the magazine, I desided to stick with the Gold Dots.

    Maybe I had a couple bad batches, but it was an eye opener. The shards fell out when I tapped the rounds. Just be careful. I still think they are a good round, just spooked me a good one.
     
  4. 1canvas

    1canvas
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2008
    3,088
    80
    Location:
    The Great State of Ohio
    one thing is different grain bullets, the difference is to minimal to be a concern. everyone likes the biggets expansion but beyond a certain point is not desirerable for best bullet performance.
     
  5. cowboy1964

    cowboy1964
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    18,832
    1,326
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    Rangers do have incredible expansion usually. I've also seen some spectacular failures. Yes, any JHP can fail to expand but I seem to see a higher incidence of it with Rangers. You virtually never see such failures like that with HSTs and for the most part Gold Dots.

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSY018CXRi8"]Winchester Ranger T-Series 9mm +P+ 127 gr JHP AMMO TEST - YouTube[/ame]

    I think HST is a more consistent performer, and performs almost like a bonded through barriers.
     
    #5 cowboy1964, Feb 8, 2012
    Last edited: Feb 9, 2012
  6. PghJim

    PghJim
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    1,935
    48
    Location:
    Pittsburgh
    I like the 165 Ranger T. As said, you cannot go by the expansion of a couple of bullets. Part of my preference is that I like the 155-165gr. bullets in a 40. And that my be the question you have to answer yourself. Both bullets are excellent.
     
  7. barth

    barth
    Expand Collapse
    six barrels

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2011
    6,047
    253
    Location:
    The Free Zone
  8. 9mm +p+

    9mm +p+
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    1,721
    17
    Location:
    KS
    ANY bullet can fail, period. I run Ranger's in my 9's and 45's and have complete faith in them, they're good enough to protect the pres so I figure they're good enough for me.
     
    #8 9mm +p+, Feb 8, 2012
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2012
  9. AWESOMO 4000

    AWESOMO 4000
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2008
    231
    2
    I prefer the Ranger T's in 9mm and .357SIG; .40 and up I like the HST. HST's seem to expand once they encounter anything, Rangers seem to get plugged sometimes with debris and become a really fast FMJ, or half of it opens, the other half folds over.

    I also have a nice 125gr JHP Ranger T in .357SIG that was received installed backwards.

    One nice thing about the HST, they seem to have more of a ball-type profile to them, so feeding should be aided if there's any issues there.
     
  10. JBP55

    JBP55
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2007
    9,568
    215
    Location:
    Louisiana
    Hard to go wrong with Gold Dot, HST, Ranger T.
     
  11. donsls6

    donsls6
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    273
    1
    Location:
    Westchester, Illinois
    Amen. I too also have used HST's and seem to be more accurate with it but also have the Ranger's. Can't go wrong with either round.
     
  12. cowboy1964

    cowboy1964
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    18,832
    1,326
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    I've always wondered if the smaller cavity on the Ranger is what (seemingly) makes them more prone to fail to expand.

    I will note that even in the video above where it failed to expand it still produced a rather impressive wound channel considering.
     
  13. hotpig

    hotpig
    Expand Collapse
    IAFF Local 4766
    CLM

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    2,627
    4
    Location:
    SW / West Central Illinois
    I have been to dozens of factory sponsored shoots by all of the major LE brands. Ranger is no more prone than any of the others. It s a crap shoot on all of them. So long as they keep putting holes in the nose of bullets failure to feed or failure to expand are going to happen.
     
  14. five-0

    five-0
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2000
    387
    0
    Location:
    MiddleTn
    +1

    See post #10.
     
  15. High Altitude

    High Altitude
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2005
    1,954
    7
    Location:
    Tennessee
    As long as you have reliability, use any premium JHP self defense ammo.

    Spend your time on training instead of wondering whether ranger t is better than HST or if Gold Dot is better etc.......

    Give me HST, Ranger T, Gold Dot etc... I don't care which one as long as the ammo feeds/fires/ejects reliably.
     
    #15 High Altitude, Feb 9, 2012
    Last edited: Feb 9, 2012
  16. NEOH212

    NEOH212
    Expand Collapse
    Diesel Girl

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    8,983
    9
    Location:
    North East Ohio
    With those numbers, I don't think the difference in expansion really matters that much. They are both great rounds and I wouldn't hesitate to carry either one. Also, your comparing a 180 grain bullet of a different type to a 165 grain bullet of a different type. I would like to see the 165 grain version HST put up against the 165 grain T-series, as well as the 180 versions. I would be willing to bet that there wouldn't be much difference in expansion then.

    IMHO, these two rounds are like comparing apples to apples. Your good to go either way.
     
  17. NEOH212

    NEOH212
    Expand Collapse
    Diesel Girl

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    8,983
    9
    Location:
    North East Ohio
    :agree:
     
  18. NEOH212

    NEOH212
    Expand Collapse
    Diesel Girl

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    8,983
    9
    Location:
    North East Ohio
    Same here! :wavey:
     
  19. Brasso

    Brasso
    Expand Collapse
    Millennium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 1998
    5,077
    342
    Location:
    Stranger in a strange land.
    People tend to get too wrapped up in expansion and penetration numbers anyway. The difference between .78 and .86 is so small and insignificant as to be absolutely meaningless in real life.
     
  20. pisc1024

    pisc1024
    Expand Collapse
    AASG

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2005
    637
    1
    Rangers are not issued to the USSS. They use Speer GD's
     
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
180gr HST, Gold Dot, or Ranger t Caliber Corner Jun 15, 2014
HST or Ranger T in 165 gr ? GATE Self-Defense Forum Apr 25, 2012
HST or ranger-t ? Caliber Corner May 13, 2011
Ranger T or HST in 147gr 9mm ? GATE Self-Defense Forum Dec 19, 2010
WTB Several Boxes Fed HST or Ranger T Wanted To Buy Apr 8, 2009