close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

House to vote on Trayvon amendment

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by Don H, May 8, 2012.


  1. Don H

    Don H
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2005
    4,294
    91
  2. JFrame

    JFrame
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 29, 2001
    37,472
    4,487
    Location:
    Mid-Atlantic, US of A
    Oh, good grief...Trust leftists to never waste a "crisis" -- manufactured or otherwise... :upeyes:


    .
     

  3. G-19

    G-19
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2004
    1,735
    0
    Another reason to get the Dems. out of D.C.
     
  4. Deployment Solu

    Deployment Solu
    Expand Collapse
    Kydex Crafter

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    6,011
    4
    Location:
    Arkansas
    The Zimmerman case has not even been heard yet. These people are ALL idiots and need to be removed from office, tarred and feathered, and barred from the USA forever.

    Anything to make it easier for the Homeboys to rape, rob, and pillage. Maybe they need a Stand Your Ground Against Politicians Law??????
     
  5. F350

    F350
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    2,532
    483
    Location:
    The Wyoming Plains
    This needs to be read in it's true meaning

    "Too many of our core voter base are getting killed off by by those nasty conservatives defending themselves from people just trying to earn a living"
     
  6. oldman11

    oldman11
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2012
    4,911
    1,729
    Location:
    Texas
    The biggest group of people against the "stand your ground rule" are the criminals. Does that tell you anything about the voting on this law? Another thing to remember is that most of the people voting on this employ armed guards/drivers for their own security.
     
  7. frank4570

    frank4570
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    15,508
    7
    It's funny because "stand your ground" has noting to do with the Zimmerman case. But as a result of peoples *perception*, the law is now in danger. Once again, perception is reality.

    Anybody who thinks image takes a backseat to reality, is mistaken.
     
  8. madbaumer

    madbaumer
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2007
    1,153
    65
    Location:
    Cental Florida
    And yet...this is the only occurance that has gained National Attention.

    [​IMG]
     
  9. ScottieG59

    ScottieG59
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    981
    3
    Location:
    Rural area near Kansas City, KS
    I have briefly looked at the relation to the "Stand Your Ground" law as it relates to any shooting. It seems to move the onus of proof to the prosecutor to show that the accused was not reacting as the reasonably prudent person.

    The presumption is that the person claiming self defense acted prudently and based on the preponderance of evidence, the defendant may not be prosecuted. The prosecutor must show that adequate evidence exists to be able to successfully pursue a trial.

    Those who complain about the law tends to focus on the presumption of reasonableness on the part of the accused.

    It is not simply an issue of run away vs. not to run away.

    Prosecutors who have a tendency to pursue an agenda may not blindly charge ahead in the absence of evidence. A hunch will not be adequate.

    Anyway, those who claim the Stand Your Ground issue does not apply in the Zimmerman case should first do a little more research outside the Internet forums. Ultimately, the law seems to apply most directly due to the presumption of reasonableness.


    Out there in fly-over country...
     
    #9 ScottieG59, May 8, 2012
    Last edited: May 8, 2012
  10. madbaumer

    madbaumer
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2007
    1,153
    65
    Location:
    Cental Florida
    Reading the Florida Statute would be a good place to start.

    http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String&URL=0700-0799/0776/Sections/0776.013.html
     
  11. NDCent

    NDCent
    Expand Collapse
    Socially Inept

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2010
    3,704
    175
    Location:
    Ozarks
    Hogwash. :miff:
     
  12. Snowman92D

    Snowman92D
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2001
    3,887
    10
    Location:
    Indianapolis
    I don't think it's going anywhere after seeing the bill's co-sponsors.

    "Federal money shouldn't be spent supporting states with laws that endanger their own people," said Reps. Raul Grijalva of Arizona and Keith Ellison of Minnesota, the two Democrats who are offering the legislation.
     
  13. Wake_jumper

    Wake_jumper
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 3, 2007
    2,218
    193
    Location:
    Kansas
    Federal money shouldn't be spent supporting states with laws that endanger their own people," said Reps. Raul Grijalva of Arizona and Keith Ellison of Minnesota, the two Democrats who are offering the legislation. "This is no different than withholding transportation funds from states that don't enforce seat-belt laws."

    And this, gentlemen, is just the beginning. A not so subtle way to get the states to do the bidding of the Federal Gov't. It isn't hard to image where this could end up.
     
  14. gunowner1

    gunowner1
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2011
    1,281
    49
    Location:
    Jensen Beach
    It's amazing they actually think we should have to retreat from these scumbags before we can defend ourselves.
     
  15. callihan_44

    callihan_44
    Expand Collapse
    INFIDEL

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2010
    5,270
    1,719
    Location:
    Flyover,USA
    i agree, dont resist when your confronted in a life threatening situation....PH_K DEMOCRATS:steamed:
     
  16. QNman

    QNman
    Expand Collapse
    resU deretsigeR
    Silver Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    9,898
    360
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    Absolutely right.
     
  17. G22Dude

    G22Dude
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    2,954
    107
    How anyone can stand behind a party that is more interested in a criminals rights than that of a law abiding citizen is beyond me. Do these nitwits and their moronic supporters realize that standing your ground doesn't mean you have to use a firearm to defend yourself.

    Are you telling me that idiots who vote democrat would not want the right to defend themselves by any means accessible. If so they truely are sheep being led around by their noses
     
  18. cowboywannabe

    cowboywannabe
    Expand Collapse
    you savvy?

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2001
    21,009
    4,519
    seat belts, drinking age.....speed limits....the federal gubmint has grown stronger than the states.
     
  19. mj9mm

    mj9mm
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2011
    5,239
    975
    Location:
    WI, looking better since Walker
    well, on the positive side, it promoted a lot of good posts here. trayvon, unfortunately, will do more harm in death than he could do while living.
     
  20. DOC44

    DOC44
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2004
    15,574
    4,500
    Location:
    in my recliner
    screw 'em

    Doc44