close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

House sets contempt vote on holder

Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by Don H, Jun 11, 2012.

  1. wjv

    wjv

    13,797
    1,218
    Jan 17, 2002
    Pacific NW
    I've been in contempt of Holder for years. . . . .
     


  2. Cavalry Doc

    Cavalry Doc MAJ (USA Ret.)

    34,969
    9
    Feb 22, 2005
    Republic of Texas
    Not getting my hopes up here. Even if they do, I don't see much chance in Mr Holder leaving his job over this.
     
  3. concretefuzzynuts

    concretefuzzynuts Brew Crew

    7,475
    13
    Dec 27, 2011
    PNW
    He'll be leaving after the Nov election with the rest of that crew.
     
  4. VinnieD

    VinnieD

    1,240
    45
    Mar 26, 2011
    I only ask why the charge is contempt and not high treason.
     
  5. Gunhaver

    Gunhaver the wrong hands

    2,736
    0
    Jan 24, 2012
    "The Justice Department later retracted the denial."

    What a eloquent way to say, "The ****ers lied to congress in writing".

    No lapdog media my ass.
     
  6. windplex

    windplex

    9,131
    1
    Aug 2, 2005
    Milwaukee
    the black panther voting incident - condoning voter intimidation. should have earned contempt.

    this one certainly rises to it.
     
  7. snerd

    snerd

    12,652
    3,180
    Apr 20, 2007
    Oklahoma
    The grapevine has it that this isn't as important as the intelligence leaks, so a deal has already been made. It will go quietly away.
     
  8. concretefuzzynuts

    concretefuzzynuts Brew Crew

    7,475
    13
    Dec 27, 2011
    PNW
    Sick of the "deals". They work for me. I don't want a deal.
     
  9. JBnTX

    JBnTX Texas

    19,741
    3,813
    Aug 28, 2008
    Texas

    I was afraid of that.

    They'll drop the Fast and Furious investigation in return for a promise of full cooperation in the intelligence leaks, which are seen as a bigger chunk of red meat.

    That cooperation will never come, and investigators will be met with more stalling and interference by Eric Holder.
     
  10. Bruce H

    Bruce H

    3,841
    353
    Dec 5, 2000
    missouri
    A shoot on sight vote would be more appealing.
     
  11. juggy4711

    juggy4711 Nimrod Son

    3,060
    0
    Sep 20, 2006
    Galveston County, TX
    Same here. I give the chances the Republican put Holder to the fire about the same as when they could have done so to Slick. Basically not a chance in hell they do.
     
  12. juggy4711

    juggy4711 Nimrod Son

    3,060
    0
    Sep 20, 2006
    Galveston County, TX
    :rofl: As long as it was done fast and furiously.