Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.
Separate names with a comma.
If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.
Discussion in 'Political Issues' started by Don H, Jun 11, 2012.
I've been in contempt of Holder for years. . . . .
Not getting my hopes up here. Even if they do, I don't see much chance in Mr Holder leaving his job over this.
He'll be leaving after the Nov election with the rest of that crew.
I only ask why the charge is contempt and not high treason.
"The Justice Department later retracted the denial."
What a eloquent way to say, "The ****ers lied to congress in writing".
No lapdog media my ass.
the black panther voting incident - condoning voter intimidation. should have earned contempt.
this one certainly rises to it.
The grapevine has it that this isn't as important as the intelligence leaks, so a deal has already been made. It will go quietly away.
Sick of the "deals". They work for me. I don't want a deal.
I was afraid of that.
They'll drop the Fast and Furious investigation in return for a promise of full cooperation in the intelligence leaks, which are seen as a bigger chunk of red meat.
That cooperation will never come, and investigators will be met with more stalling and interference by Eric Holder.
Both are important.
A shoot on sight vote would be more appealing.
Same here. I give the chances the Republican put Holder to the fire about the same as when they could have done so to Slick. Basically not a chance in hell they do.
As long as it was done fast and furiously.