close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

Holding a gun makes you think others are too, new research shows

Discussion in 'Carry Issues' started by RussP, Mar 21, 2012.

  1. Gallium

    Gallium CLM

    28,685
    10
    Mar 26, 2003
    I think the Amadou Diallo shooting already underscored that a dozen years ago.
     


  2. LoadToadBoss

    LoadToadBoss IYAAYWOT

    3,489
    86
    Apr 24, 2008
    Northwest Louisiana
    Does this research indicate that LEOs (who carry guns) are predisposed to "see" a gun in the hands of those they encounter when in fact there was no gun?
     
  3. All wise sayings have at least some grains of truth to them. And the adage "When one only has a hammer, all problems look like nails" has always been pretty much on the mark.
     
  4. Now this would be an interesting research project. What percent of LE shootings occurred because the LEOs saw a GUN? And of that percentage (number), how many where no gun was found or otherwise explained (ie: BG's friend grabbed gun and escaped, holding an object that looked like a gun)?

    Similarly, I would also like to see a study where non-LEOs used their guns after seeing a GUN. (A study that's same as above).
     
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2012
  5. They actually paid good money to quantify this behavior? This experiment put their subjects in a situation where the subjects were given a gun (and either was implied or explicitly told) to "expect" something. The subjects are going to think "they gave me a gun. So I expect something (bad) to happen." I'm pretty sure the subjects are not thinking 'OK, I have a gun. So who in these computer photos look like they're going to a birthday party?'

    This is like putting totally untrained people into shoot/don't shoot (military, LE, shooting schools, etc...) scenarios. Usually everybody gets shot.
     
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2012
  6. Bren

    Bren NRA Life Member

    42,068
    8,920
    Jan 16, 2005
    Kentucky
    I suspect the reasearch's conclusion are partly BS. "Expecting a gun" seems a lot more likely than "holding a gun" as the cause, but one probably leads to another, especially among those who don't normally carry guns.
     
  7. :whistling:for me, i wanted my ccl because i know there are many out there that carry a gun. i had to wait along time for my state to allow me to carry, while all along i knew punks and badguys were already carrying:cool:
     
  8. 4TS&W

    4TS&W 2A RKBA 4EVER

    3,583
    0
    Jul 20, 2002
    here and there...
    That's why ignorant liberals of Chicago are in such bliss... right up until someone sticks a gun in their face, because the opposite is also true, if you don't carry one, (because it is against the law) you think everyone else is also not carrying one.

    Even when the weekend death toll is always double digits.
     
  9. Gallium

    Gallium CLM

    28,685
    10
    Mar 26, 2003

    Yes, conclusively. It is proven over and over again in FoF LE training.
     
  10. dyobvk

    dyobvk

    60
    0
    Feb 24, 2012
    I often find myself doing body scans for handgun prints.
     
  11. Bren

    Bren NRA Life Member

    42,068
    8,920
    Jan 16, 2005
    Kentucky
    What is the source of your information?
     

  12. I'm also curious as to source.

    Is your statistics only for those FoF scenarios where trainees shot before they had probable cause?

    Or for all FoF training as a whole, where most scenarios are designed to force a shooting?
     
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2012
  13. LoadToadBoss

    LoadToadBoss IYAAYWOT

    3,489
    86
    Apr 24, 2008
    Northwest Louisiana
    Participants in FoF training ARE expecting to see a gun at some point; not because they have a gun in their hand, but because that's the condition of the training. Since they are already predisposed to expect to see a gun at some point, the fact that they do (inaccurately) see one is understandable. The study didn't put people into the condition where they would expect to see a gun, but concluded that just by having one made the subject more like than not to see a gun in another person's hand when there was none. The conclusions seem dubious to me.
     
  14. I have a cousin who CCWs and owns a tailor shop/dry cleaning. The first thing he does, almost unconsciously, when he meets someone is to assess the condition of their clothing. (Are white shirt white? Does suit fit? Are cloths clean? etc...) Tailoring and cleaning clothes is his job and he does it well.
     
  15. SGT HATRED

    SGT HATRED

    4,000
    298
    Sep 30, 2010
    PHX AZ
    And they didn't even use real guns....

    "subjects did this while holding either a TOY gun or a neutral object such as a foam ball".
     
  16. Gallium

    Gallium CLM

    28,685
    10
    Mar 26, 2003
    N

    I was referring to police officers going thru shoot/don't shoot and FoF scenarios for the 1st time; and not to suggest that officers who have been well exposed to shoot/don't shoot and FoF training are as prone to this compared to officers who have never been thru FoF/active shooter/shoot-don't shoot training.

    It also happens in training with non LE placed in a (training) scenario where they are armed and expecting to resolve the situation with or without force) seeing guns, or threats where none exist) at high rates...and in many cases, firing shots/using deadly force where it was not warranted.

    -G
     
  17. Bren

    Bren NRA Life Member

    42,068
    8,920
    Jan 16, 2005
    Kentucky
    The question was "how do you know the police do that?"

    I think we were both asking because many Glock Talk members post about "what the police do" or police practices that they actually know nothing about - some of it is based on news reports or movies and TV shows, which are far from the truth.
     
  18. Oramac

    Oramac

    1,001
    0
    Oct 15, 2008
    A better research question, imo, would be:

    Does possessing (not holding) a gun make one more likely to see a gun?

    I.e. if the test subject has a holstered firearm (like us CCWers) but is not holding the gun in hand, are they still more likely to see a gun on or being held by others?