close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Heavier recoil spring for Glock 32

Discussion in 'General Glocking' started by ourichie, Jul 13, 2013.


  1. ourichie

    ourichie
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2013
    6
    0
    I have read that the 19, 23, and 32 use the same recoil spring and it seems like my gen3 32 is beating itself hard even with target loads. I was thinking on getting a slightly heavier spring like a 20# or 22#. I know they go up to 24#. Any advice from the firing squad?
     

    Wanna kill these ads? We can help!
    #1 ourichie, Jul 13, 2013
    Last edited: Jul 17, 2013
  2. sig357fan

    sig357fan
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    930
    66
    Location:
    SW OH
    I replaced my RSA on my G31 with a LWD captured guide rod and a 20 lbs. spring,...... the main reason was brass to the face........not me, the guy 5 lanes down on the firing line :rofl:

    real reason was so I wouldn't have to chase brass 30 ft. heavier spring did smooth things out a little but didn't stop the dreaded slide peening pretty common to Glocks in 357 Sig with a higher round count.

    sig357fan
     

  3. cciman

    cciman
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2009
    3,582
    117
    Location:
    SW Ohio
    Don't worry about the "battering"-- you will run out of ammo money before the frame wears out. Even then, return it to Smyrna, and they replace the frame.

    In general:
    Heavier spring= more shooter perceived recoil, shorter ejected brass trajectory

    Lighter spring= less perceived recoil, farther brass trajectory

    Changing springs= brag swag, hey look at me.
     
    #3 cciman, Jul 13, 2013
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2013
  4. PBRLite

    PBRLite
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2009
    697
    5
    Location:
    Kansas
    I go with a 20 lb spring in my G32 and G22....when shooting .40 and 357sig with my 357sig barrel.
     
  5. silversport

    silversport
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 28, 2003
    2,825
    83
    Location:
    ChicagoLand, USA
    not for free (frame replacement) but I agree you probably won't see battering as long as you follow the the proper intervals for spring/RSA replacement...

    Bill
     
  6. allglockedup

    allglockedup
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2012
    37
    0
    Location:
    N.H.
    Just curious have you contacted Glock about this. Also what was your born on date ?

    posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
     
  7. ourichie

    ourichie
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2013
    6
    0
    BoD: May 8 2000.

    It didn't look like it had been shot that much as it still had a lot of the copper colored anti seize in it when I procured it about 2 moms ago. I have shot about 400 rounds through it since.

    I have not contacted glock about this yet. Planning on it Monday
     
  8. AK74play

    AK74play
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2010
    1,604
    3
    Location:
    Indiana
    I run 20 & 22 lb springs in all my Glock including my 32 for only 2 reasons. Less felt recoil which honestly aint a problem even with the sig round and it's easier on my frames. Don't care where brass goes as long as it goes out. :cool:
     
  9. Rev.357

    Rev.357
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2012
    436
    0
    Location:
    Heath Springs SC
    Leave it alone!
     
  10. clarkz71

    clarkz71
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2012
    1,609
    3
    Location:
    South Florida
    I do find it odd that a 9mm & a .357 Sig would use the same RSA.
     
  11. dougthug

    dougthug
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    51
    0
    Location:
    Boston
    Just curious please...I had posted that I'm purchasing a G32 soon myself.

    What spring would you consider to change over to, the #20 or #22 like someone had suggested earlier?

    Not sure how big a difference each one is from the other...

    Thanks
     
  12. Maine

    Maine
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2009
    2,813
    4,262
    I suggest keeping the factory one. I've owned 3 or 4 G32s and never had an RSA related issue. I'm confident that if the gun needed a heavier spring for any reason, Glock would change things.
     
    #12 Maine, Jul 17, 2013
    Last edited: Jul 17, 2013
  13. ede

    ede
    Expand Collapse
    Bama's Friend

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    8,190
    40
    Location:
    Texas
    Heavier spring is going to make the recoil feel a lot heavier, and it ought to land the brass a little closer to where you stand. The frame wear is common and from my experience only goes so far and then doesn't get worse.
     
  14. Mike-M

    Mike-M
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2012
    1,868
    486
    That's true for Gen3 and earlier, and for associated subcompacts. But not for Gen4 compact and larger models.

    Gen3 and Gen4 G26, G27, G33, and G39 use RSA marked 0-8-1.

    Gen3 G19, G23, G32, and G38 use RSA marked 5579.
    Gen3 G17, G22, G31, G34, G35, and G37 use RSA marked 5593-1.

    Gen4 G19 uses RSA marked 0-4-3.
    Gen4 G23 and G32 use RSA marked 0-3-3. (There is no Gen4 G38.)
    Gen4 G17 and G34 use RSA marked 0-2-4.
    Gen4 G22, G31, G35, and G37 use RSA marked 0-1-4.

    The Gen4 world is a little more complex than Gen3 and earlier, with specific lighter RSAs for 9x19mm models, except the G26. No doubt the reduced slide mass of the G26 results in adequate slide velocity even when an RSA that serves heavier calibers is employed.
     
    #14 Mike-M, Jul 17, 2013
    Last edited: Jul 17, 2013
  15. unit1069

    unit1069
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    8,114
    163
    Location:
    So. Central US
    I installed a Wolff stainless steel guide rod and Wolff 20# spring. It reduced the recoil noticeably and I haven't had a single malfunction.
     
  16. clarkz71

    clarkz71
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2012
    1,609
    3
    Location:
    South Florida
    I know, the OP has a gen3, and I know all the gen 3 compacts use the same RSA.

    Just wonder why, the .357 being so much hotter a round then the 9mm.



    More complex?? I think they just didn't do enough R&D with the dual spring before they released the gen4 leading to the problems with the 9mm.
     
  17. cciman

    cciman
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2009
    3,582
    117
    Location:
    SW Ohio
    Ultimately, it makes no consumer difference.

    The 357sig, feels like a 9mm, and the brass flies 3 ft. farther (so what). Production and supply costs stay the same.

    Advantage all around from the corporate side. Advantages on the consumer side also-- uses the same RSA, lower perceived recoil.

    No brainer.

     
  18. cciman

    cciman
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2009
    3,582
    117
    Location:
    SW Ohio
    I think I said that too.

     
  19. cciman

    cciman
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2009
    3,582
    117
    Location:
    SW Ohio
    People talk about the gen4 RSA like it was some magical device, yet NO ONE has ever posted any spring dynometer comparisons.

    No one knows, just conjecture, and ass-umption, on how the Gen4 spring assembly compares to the single spring setup. Could be identical, or 2 deviations from the mean.



     
  20. ede

    ede
    Expand Collapse
    Bama's Friend

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    8,190
    40
    Location:
    Texas
    How did you work around the physics in reducing the recoil?