close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

Gun nation: Inside America's gun-carry culture

Discussion in 'Carry Issues' started by happyguy, Mar 18, 2012.

  1. Sbh87

    Sbh87 Handgunner

    Saw this on a different gun forum. I only read bits and pieces of it and didn't care for it too much. Most people on that forum found it to be somewhat neutral and people seemed pretty surprised about that.
     


  2. steveksux

    steveksux Massive Member

    19,333
    1,811
    Jul 12, 2007
    Well, the first pages seems neutral and balanced. Not sure how much more I feel like reading.

    Randy
     
  3. eracer

    eracer Where's my EBT?

    6,711
    2
    Apr 5, 2011
    Tampa, FL
    A decent - if superficial - compendium of recent gun law history. Focused a lot on North Carolina, but did mention some of the other, more recent State actions, and well as recent SCOTUS decisions.

    Didn't really delve into the debate much, except to present the opinions of a few people on either side of the dabate.

    Neither especially biased, nor especially interesting (at least to those who pay at least some attention to the subject.)
     
    Last edited: Mar 18, 2012
  4. unit1069

    unit1069

    8,128
    169
    Oct 10, 2007
    So. Central US
    The Monitor is a liberal publication but they do try to appear fair. The article is decidedly liberal and the choice of terminology indicates to me the writer has an anti-rights bias.

    We should all remember that language plays a great part in forming opinions and a sure tip-off to one's anti-rights bias is the term "gun culture". Those of us who enjoy exercising our individual right perhaps might start using the term "collectivist culture" to describe people (like the writer) who deliberately misrepresent our rights in order to further their agendas. Or perhaps the author really doesn't know much about the constitution.

    For example, the author states that the Second Amendment is granted by the constitution, whereas the Bill of Rights are inalienable, God-given rights that the constitution confirms, not confers. If the constitution confers a right that right can be denied. If the Second Amendment's individual right to keep and bear arms is denied what's to prevent a tyrant, oligarchy, or the mob majority denying the First Amendment?

    If we use every opportunity that presents itself to use our own terminology with a clear understanding of the constitution it counters the collectivist culture that always paves the way for tyranny.
     
  5. steveksux

    steveksux Massive Member

    19,333
    1,811
    Jul 12, 2007
    I'm old fashioned. I thought the Bill of Rights WAS the first 10 Amendments, 2nd Amendment included.

    Randy
     
  6. unit1069

    unit1069

    8,128
    169
    Oct 10, 2007
    So. Central US
    You're correct; maybe what I wrote is confusing. What I hope is clear is that both the First and Second Amendments are preexisting God-given individual rights the constitution confirms.