close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Welcome to Glock Talk

Why should YOU join our Glock forum?

  • Converse with other Glock Enthusiasts
  • Learn about the latest hunting products
  • Becoming a member is FREE and EASY

If you consider yourself a beginner or an avid shooter, the Glock Talk community is your place to discuss self defense, concealed carry, reloading, target shooting, and all things Glock.

Glock 26 or 27

Discussion in 'General Glocking' started by 45 Cal, Dec 4, 2012.

  1. 45 Cal

    45 Cal

    44
    1
    Dec 15, 2011
    I've decided to sell my Springfield XDS and replace it either with a Glock 26 Gen 4 or Glock 27, Gen 4. While I'm sold on the platform (as I already own a G19 and love it), I'm having a hard time deciding which caliber to buy.

    I plan to shoot and likely carry either gun in 9mm. Either buy the G26 or the G27 with a conversion barrel. I would typically go straight for the G26 due to it being a factory 9mm, but I like the idea of shooting the 9mm, .40 cal, or .357 SIG out of the same gun.

    I guess my question is: How reliable is the G27 with a good conversion barrel? Is it reliable enough to trust your life to? And is it worth buying the 27 to have the ability to shoot 3 calibers?
     
  2. Dreamliner787

    Dreamliner787

    61
    0
    Jul 12, 2012
    G27 is snappy and G26 are less snappy. I got the G27 with the Lone Wolf conversion and no issues so far with over 300 rounds through it and I would trust it just like I do my G19. I do have to say that with higher mag capacity, my preference has changed to carrying the G19 more but the smaller for of the G26/G27 still has it's place at certain times. I use the 9mm mags instead of the 40SW mags.
     


  3. GPBob

    GPBob

    97
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    I posed approximately the same question earlier this year. I said I would go as far as changing out the ejector, extractor and spring loaded bearing in 9mm for the 27. I got more posts telling me to just go with a 26 and not trust my life on a conversion. Many said that it would be great for the range but just go OEM for defense.

    I took that advice and dropped the 27 and now own two 26s. With a mixture of Corbon 115 +p and Speer Gold Dot 124 +p I believe I'm covered.
     
  4. As much as I like my G22 I have no plans to carry it with a conversion barrel. My G19c, and my G26 are my carry guns. I might pick up a 357 sig barrel someday for the range but I wouldn't be comfortable using something like that as my personal defense weapon.


    Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
     
  5. DocWills

    DocWills

    527
    11
    Mar 11, 2012
  6. AtlantaR6

    AtlantaR6

    299
    0
    Jul 29, 2004
    Why you no likey the XDs? I'm thinking of picking one up to replace my g26.
     
  7. 45 Cal

    45 Cal

    44
    1
    Dec 15, 2011
    I actually really like the XDS. The trigger is great, better than any XD I've fired, and I like the accuracy and size of the gun. There are just two things that are driving me nuts about it. 1) I hate that I've only got a 6 shot capability. 2) I absolutely cannot stand a safety on my carry gun and the XDS has the standard Springfield grip safety.
     
  8. Bruce M

    Bruce M

    39,511
    10,339
    Jan 3, 2010
    S FL
    Alot of people seem to have no reliablity issues with converson barrels. Alot of people also seem to have no reliability issues with platinum coated gadolinium guide rods. But apparently sometimes a few do. For carry put me in the column that much prefers a stock gun.
     
  9. sioux565

    sioux565

    98
    0
    Nov 1, 2012
    Wisconsin
    I say get the 27, but I am a little biased. I do agree with others about not carrying with the conversion kit in.
     
  10. HexHead

    HexHead

    4,815
    0
    Jul 16, 2009
    Get the 26. I'd get a 39 long before I'd get a 27.
     
  11. vmann

    vmann Controller

    2,183
    44
    Jan 22, 2010
    DFW
    what a retarded post.....
     
  12. ChicagoZman

    ChicagoZman

    1,075
    14
    Jun 29, 2010
    Indiana
    Have a 27 and carry it on occasion (typical carry gun is a 23). Nevertheless, I would recommend a 26 for the reason that it has slightly less recoil and will therefore be slightly easier to shoot rapidly in a self defense situation. I'm stuck in the 90s with my .40 self defense guns.

    Were I to start over, I would get 9mm exclusively, but I'm too heavily invested in .40 (ammo, reloading components, magazines, etc.) to switch now.
     
  13. LampShadeActual

    LampShadeActual

    297
    10
    Sep 12, 2012
    My experience around police agencies is that while a lot of M27's get bought, far fewer are kept by the officers, and even fewer are fired much. Marginally manageable, but not really fun to shoot.

    On the other hand, a lot of M26's get bought, they are kept by the officers, and get practiced with. Manageable recoil and easy enough to shoot for practice. Carry what you practice with.
     
  14. MNBud

    MNBud

    799
    22
    Feb 15, 2007
    suburb of Mpls. Mn.
    I wasn't going to go as far as retarded but I agree with you.
     
  15. LuckyG

    LuckyG

    227
    1
    Sep 14, 2011
    Northeast
    Yep. I personally like the .40 in my civilian SD guns, but I don't use sub-compacts. It is a fine caliber, generally, provided the shooter has good fundamentals and is willing to work with it. For the casual shooter (for lack of a better term), a good 9mm is probably a better choice.

    Our LGC has a large NRA pistol program and we put a lot of students through basic and personal protection courses. Consequently, we see a lot of different handguns, calibers and skill levels. One year I was coaching a shooter (Basic Pistol) who was using a G27 with factory ball. After single shots we switched to two controlled shots. His second one went into the ceiling. Fortunately, our ceiling is armored with steel plates.

    Students using 9mm guns are a lot easier to teach. You can concentrate on fundamentals and not get recoil mixed into the equation. For defensive purposes, mindset and hits are the important elements. A slight increase in terminal ballistics specs won't make up for lack of the other two. Even for experienced shooters, there is nothing wrong with a good 9mm, as long as attention is paid to proper load selection.
     
  16. Chuck TX

    Chuck TX CLM

    6,241
    445
    Jul 11, 2003
    Republic of Texas
    If you're going to carry it in 9mm, I'd get it stock in 9mm. Conversions are fun, lots of fun, but have not been reliable enough for me that I'd be comfortable carrying one.